The stone of the title is an enormous diamond plundered from an Indian shrine after the Siege of Seringapatam. Given to Miss Verinder on her 18th birthday, it mysteriously disappears that very night. Suspicion falls on three Indian jugglers who have been seen in the neighbourhood.
© and (P)2014 Audible, Inc.
"fabric artist and quilter"
This is reputed to be the first ever whodonit mystery written and as a detective novel it was great. It is not now my favourite genre - I have in my time read many of Agatha Christie's and other such mysteries and this is up there with the best of them. However, after listening to A Lady in White I was fully expecting a more gothic setting and as such the book was a bit disappointing.
A similar format was employed by Wilkie Collins' in that different sections of the book were spoken by different characters such as the butler, the inspector, dinner party guests etc. However, unlike the version of A Lady in White that I heard where there were both a male and female narrator were used, in this Peter Jeffery read both male and female characters. He did a good job but it lacked the drama I expected.
I did enjoy it, I didn't guess the thief and it was very entertaining. Recommended to those that enjoy whodonits and want to hear the one that started it all.
Quite apart from having an ingenious plot, this story is brimming with characters you will either come to love or come to love to loathe! Peter Jeffrey's narration is simply brilliant.
The plot kept me guessing the whole time.
Like the great Cuff, I would go into service and work for Gabriel Betteredge if Peter Jeffrey were playing him. The book is worth the price of admission just to hear Betteredge talk about himself. Miss Clack is deliciously hateful.
This is a story you can listen to over and over again with the same enjoyment as you had the first time you heard it.
Say something about yourself!
This is a classic for a reason. Despite its impressive length, the listener doesn't want it to end. (Well, this one didn't, at any rate.)
At its heart, this is a mystery story - the first great detective novel, in fact - centered on the question of the theft of the moonstone. (This layers irony upon irony, as it is stolen no less than four times - and, for that matter, the tale is built on the original theft of the stone by a British officer from its native Indian setting.) Collins skillfully builds the novel upon the foundations of the real-life Constance Kent murder case of 1860, basing the police inspector, Sergeant Cuff, on the living model of Detective Inspector Jonathan 'Jack' Whicher. He also captures some of the burgeoning method and mindset of forensic science through the theories and experiments of his character Mr. Candy.
What sets this novel apart, beyond its claim to many "firsts," is the remarkable multi-layered texture of the tale. Collins uses a variety of narrators - male and female, highborn and lowly, of various ethnic and racial backgrounds - to convey his story, and he shows remarkable sympathy and sensitivity in writing about the outcast and marginalized characters as well as the mainstream and traditional ones. The Moonstone may be a read as a work of social criticism, an indictment of imperialism and the white man's (or woman's) burden, and a commentary on a crucial moment in intellectual history in which custom, faith, superstition, prejudice, reason, and science were colliding in a particularly powerful way. Even Collins's minor characters and asides are weighty and thought-provoking.
The Moonstone outsold Great Expectations by Dickens when it was originally published, and it's easy to see why. As a novel - not simply a detective novel, or a Victorian novel, or an English novel - it holds up extremely well to multiple modern readings/listenings.
Peter Jeffrey's narration is as flawless as they come. He manages to distinguish many characters' voices from each other with seeming effortlessness, and he fills his reading with warmth and humor, dread and pathos at all the perfect places. I simply can't recommend this highly enough.
I love to read mysteries, histories, biographies, humor, and Jane Austen.
I enjoyed listening to this, though I found it a bit slow sometimes. Didn't realize this was basically the first detective story ever written. As a detective story, it seemed a bit thin, but then again it's hard to get everything right when you are inventing a genre! I've also read that Collin's description of laudanum addiction is remarkably accurate. The reader is excellent. For folks who enjoy 19th century literature, be sure to give this one a listen - you will enjoy it.
Rating scale: 5=Loved it, 4=Liked it, 3=Ok, 2=Disappointed, 1=Hated it. I look for well developed characters, compelling stories.
When reading The Moonstone, it might be useful to remember the time in which it was written, and think of Victorian decor - lots of florals, stuffed cushions, and knick-knacks. The concept of "less is more" simply doesn't exist. That will prepare you for Wilkie Collins' writing style which is also a product of its time. Economy of expression does not exist, but if you can forgive the verbosity and appreciate the characters and the plot, you may enjoy this ancestor of the mystery novels genre. Personally I had mixed feelings - sometimes enraptured by the excellent character development (Mr. Betteridge and Miss Clack being especially well drawn) and then frustrated by repetition and irrelevancies. If I had not listened to it on Audble, because of the excessive descriptiveness I would have either skimmed past the wordier sections or possibly given up altogether. But the excellent reading kept me engaged.
Judged by todays mystery/thriller standards, it is tame and overly complicated. Lives don't hang in the balance, clues are not left out in the open for the reader to be able to solve the crime along with the characters. If it had been written today with the same overstuffed style, I would rate it lower than a four, but I could clearly see the forerunner of Sherlock Holmes and of the English "cozy" mysteries in this story and appreciated it for what it was. Readers expecting action and thrills will not be so satisfied.
This story line was so boring at first that I would have turned it off if I hadn't been driving. However it gets better about one third of the way into the story. It's probably worth a listen.
This book was thought highly of by Dorothy Sayers, a major intellect and mystery writer of the last century. Her recommendation did not disappoint: wonderfully written with humorous touches thruout, including subtle critiques of social and religious mores of the time. First rate!
Excellent reading that included various voice portraits that added interest and character to the tale. I would happily listen to other books that he has read.
Whatever the genre is, I certainly am turned off of it now.
Cut about a million superfluous words from the script
Not agree to publish such an obvious waste of paper
How this thing ever got the ratings it did is beyond me, so many of the books I see are rated so much higher than they should be, I wonder if the authors didn't write the reviews themselves sometimes.
This book is one of the most beautifully read audio books I have heared in a long time, a great and we'll written story, if a little rambling at times, it's clear why this is considered a classic. However it's Peter Jeffrey who re-envigorates it with such perfect character interpretation.
No, the book is too long
The humble house servant who like Robinson Crusoe.
not a bad book, just really long
I absolutely loved reading the Moonstone (in paper) years ago, and was excited to get the audiobook. It does not disappoint. The individual character of each persons narrative (different characters are used to relate the same story) is preserved perfectly by the use of different voices cleverly done, not over accented. Although this may be considered a classic, I would suggest really it is a comedy, lots of laugh out loud sentences while driving along in the car! Highly recommended.
"Extremely well narrated but slow in sections."
Peter Jeffrey is a superb actor the different characters are very plausible and read with a great feeling for the work which was in parts very well written, however there was a section in the book which was soporific and of little value to the plot-so just three from me!
"My first Audio book"
I drive a lot so this was a great way to pass the endless motorway hours. The story is slow but excellent and the voice acting is absolutely first class. The only issue I had with this audio book is that the it seems very quiet and lacking in middle and treble so I had to turn it up to max volume whilst turning the bass right down. Overall I would recommend this audio book to anyone who likes likes detective novels and Victorian England.
"A relaxing listen"
I found the narrators voice very soothing and pleasant to listen to. An old classic that is still worth listening to. It may be a little dated but I thoroughly enjoyed this mystery story.
"PoMo before the Post Moderns"
Before the Post Modernists became dated they would have looked to this novel as a early example of much that they set out to achieve. Multiple points of view, shifts in time, location and narrative voice, a juxtaposition between the various narrators, the authorial voice and the reader. All of these elements work?.but at some cost. The cost being some rather lengthy passages in the middle of this novel that seemed to me to take ?us? nowhere and lead us up and down some rather quaint, ivy and dust covered garden paths before leading us back to the Shivering Sands. I?m still at a complete loss as to what exactly Drusilla Clack brings to this novel other than some very funny tract titles
A first-class reading of an old favourite. The story rambles on a bit compared to modern detective fiction, but when it's writing as good as this, who cares? Peter Jeffrey's voices and accents are spot on.
"Excellent period piece, brilliantly read"
The audiobook is convincingly read by one voice but each section is delivered in a different accent and manner to represent the very diverse characters who contribute to the story. The book has a slow moving plot but it is full of authentic period detail and the subtle ironic humour of the author is brillianty brought to life by the reader.
As everyone says, this is a wonderful audiobook, perfect from every point of view. I'm sure Wilkie Collins himself would have enjoyed listening to it!
"Well narrated but the story is too slow"
I would not listen to this again, it's too slow for me. I had to find out what happened in the end but it was a bit of a struggle.
I like to listen to books while I am doing some tedious job or surfing the net etc and normally my concentration is good, this book required my full attention, not such an easy listen.
"Very good indeed apart from the final seconds!"
Really. Audible. You've got to get narrators to say 'The End' and put a proper space at the end to give us a chance to not have the ending ruined by your 'Audible hopes you enjoyed this programme' speech. Yes. I enjoyed the programme, right up to the point where you ruined it.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.