How is it that the law enforcer itself does not have to keep the law? How is it that the law permits the state to lawfully engage in actions which, if undertaken by individuals, would land them in jail? These are among the most intriguing issues in political and economic philosophy. More specifically, the problem of law that itself violates law is an insurmountable conundrum of all statist philosophies. The problem has never been discussed so profoundly and passionately as in this essay by Frederic Bastiat from 1850.
The essay might have been written today. It applies to our own time. It applies in all times in which the state assumes unto itself different rules and different laws from that by which it expects other people to live. And so we have this legendary essay, written in a white heat against the leaders of 19th century France, the reading of which has shocked millions out of their toleration of despotism. This new edition from the Mises Institute revives a glorious translation that has been out of print for a hundred years, one that circulated in Britain in the generation that followed Bastiat's death.
This newly available translation provides new insight into Bastiat s argument. The question that Bastiat deals with: how to tell when a law is unjust or when the law maker has become a source of law breaking? When the law becomes a means of plunder it has lost its character of genuine law. When the law enforcer is permitted to do with others lives and property what would be illegal if the citizens did them, the law becomes perverted. Bastiat doesn t avoid the difficult issues, such as why should we think that a democratic mandate can convert injustice to justice.
He deals directly with the issue of the expanse of legislation: It is not true that the mission of the law is to regulate our consciences, our ideas, our will, our education, our sentiments, our works, our exchanges, our gifts, our enjoyments. Its mission is to prevent the rights of one from interfering with those of another, in any one of these things. Law, because it has force for its necessary sanction, can only have as its lawful domain the domain of force, which is justice.
©2013 BN Publishing (P)2013 BN Publishing
Its like a bottle of fresh air. Only a true free thinking genius could come up with something so timeless like this. By far the most important book for anyone to read in these desperate times.
All the concepts especially later on in the book are memorable.
Every time I read this book I take more and more away from it. Simply amazing!
This treatise is just as important and essential reading, today, as when Bastiat first published this groundbreaking arguement for Classical Liberalism.
All I can say again and again and again, for conservatives, minarchists, and libertarians; READ BASTIAT! This is a most excellent primer, and you'll be hard pressed to find more concise and obvious description for the nature of The State.
Of course they would just dismiss his writing just like they do of everything else that doesn't fit their ideas on how the world should work.
But you might get a few to open their minds to how things truly are.
Better performance. The narrator's tone was all over the place and proved very distracting.
Zero. It's a short essay as it is.
This is a superb essay that I recommend reading. This audiobook version does not do it justice.
It is profound but straightforward at the same time. Having heard of Bastiat but never read his work, I was afraid it might be written in a way that takes a lot of time and effort for a modern American listener to understand. This was written by an 1850 Frenchman after all. But listening to this reading of Bastiat was almost like listening to someone read a transcript of the Mark Levin Show (minus Levin's testimonials for Caspar mattresses and Levin TV!) Levin is obviously very strongly influenced by Bastiat. This book could be subtitled "Legal Plunder".
(it's not a story)
I wasn't familiar with the narrator (Ron Eastwood), but was very happy with his performance. My only complaint was it is very difficult to tell when Bastiat is quoting other people, versus when the quote has finished and he is making his own comments again. There are several places where Bastiat does quote from others.
Yes - I listened to about 2/3 while driving one night, then finished while in the car again a few days later, and immediately re-started and listened all the way through!
This is highly recommended, I wish I'd given this book a try years ago.
Report Inappropriate Content