A complex plot of love and inheritance is set against the English legal system of the mid-19th century. As the case of Jarndyce and Jarndyce drags on, it becomes an obsession to everyone involved. And the issue on an inheritance ultimately becomes a question of murder.
©2006 Naxos Audiobooks; (P)2006 Naxos Audiobooks
The two narrators worked really well. It really felt like reading the book.
Dickens always has such varied and interesting characters. This book is particularly filled with them.
The scene where Esther and Mr. Bucket chase after Lady Dedlock was very exciting, and ultimately sad.
What a wonderful man John Jandyce is, but some of the characters take advantage of them.
I would say that this is an excellent version of Bleak House, and I would highly recommend it.
Other reviewers talk about the narration and I agree the dual narration is the key to this book as there are many female parts and a male only would hurt the story. There are several Esther Summerson narrations in the book and in my opinion can only be done with a female voice. This is a character driven novel galore with Tulkinghorn, Mr. Guppy, Skimpole, Mr Snagsby, Smallweed, I don't know nothing Jo, It is a classic like Great Expectations and Oliver Twist. I saw the two BBC TV series on Bleak House, but the 1985 follows the book more.
If you are a Dickens fan then this book will not disappoint. Bleak House was anything else but beak to me.
Massive, complex and heartrending, Bleak House is one of the greatest novels every written.
Too hard a question! I love Esther's narrative for the way she both undervalues herself in her humility but at the same time always follows her instincts, which are always sound. So she is both very modest and very strong. I also love the character of Tulkinghorn, as evil and secretive and meddlesome and smarmy a lawyer as the world has ever seen. Then too, Mr Jarndyce and his Growlery is a wonderful thing. And poor Joe, certainly the most heartrending character in the novel. Mr Bucket is pretty fabulous too, with his relentless detectiving joined to a kind and gentle heart. Who can choose???
They are both very gifted readers. They are not showy nor do they draw attention to themselves. but they manage to capture each voice and each dialect perfectly, a pretty amazing feat given Dickens' penchant for creating a huge cast of characters from across the entire spectrum of English society.
Both, on almost every page.
I am two thirds through (27 hours and counting) and I dread finishing the novel. Maybe I'll just start all over again.
This audiobook was unbelievable. I got it on the recommendation of another Audible patron who wrote about the two people reading the book. They didn't just read, they created at least 30 characters with accents and personality quirks. It was great!
No way I could do that!
not first, but I'm a Dickens fan, so it's up there. I don't buy book I don't like!
Love their voices and gravity of the content.
Sad commentary on the legal system, then and now.
Simply one of the best books ever written.. and Sean Barrett makes this one of the best audio books ever narrated.
I've wanted to read Bleak House for a long time, but the fact that it's about a legal case put me off. I should've trusted Dickens's story telling talents: what a remarkable story! What memorable characters! Once again, Dickens's support for every day people and their struggles as well as his social conscience add energy and vision to an incredible tapestry of characters and plot. Sean Barrett and Teresa Gallagher are perfect narrators. I was enthralled for the 35 hours--and that's saying something! The only quibbles are my usual issue with the saintly female persona that Dickens sometimes creates (Dora in David Copperfield, for example): Esther gets perilously close to that by the end, but her long-suffering is balanced out by the profusion of wonderful other women, including independent businesswoman Caddy Jellaby and Miss Flyte. Also, I had to re-download this to get it to play on my ipod, as it didn't automatically come in three sections, which was an unexpected hitch resolved by Audible's support. Anyway: I can see, again, why Dickens was a Victorian literary rock star. Wow.
Reading, the arts and physical activity clarify, explain, illustrate, and interpret life’s goods and bads.
Its cadence is so very Romantic Age. All works out somewhat well – and the full bodied words that Dickens uses to take you along for his tale are enchanting. Yet, be forewarned, after the initial tale begins, it tends to dull out for a while. Forebear!
The tale picks up in the second half and Dickens is at his best demonstrating the hypocrisy of the judicial system. The system, of justice, is built to right wrongs. In fact, Dickens teaches us it is a mere theater-place for the diabolical to take advantage of those in need. Woe to those in need. Like all Dickens novels: its there to demonstrate a societal injustice and hope the reading society now knows what needs to be corrected and in a Hegelian way it will come about.
Dickens works, always seem to introduce us to evil men who turn out to be great men, and established men that do not deserve their wealth and status. Yet, the book, for all its worth, is only secondary to meeting the most wonderful of people – our heroine, Ester Summerson. A wonderful person to meet - and have in one’s own life. She is at the center of most of the little side stories that keep the major tale going and one never tires of her kindness and perfect outlook on the world. There are better Romantic pieces but, if you are addicted to 19th century England; this a worthwhile read.
Since Dickens can be difficult to read because the books are very 'wordy', having the audio to listen to and reading the book at the same time was a joy. Hearing the different voices of the characters, accents and all, and listening to the flow of Dickens' beautiful writing was wonderful.
I will definitely do this again, especially for more difficult texts. And the price was right. If these were priced any higher, it would limit my ability to but both the book and the audio.
Esther Summerson is my favorite character from any of Dickens' novels. She is uncommonly good, but there's enough vinegar in her descriptions of the people she comes across to make her seem like a real person. Sean Barrett's depiction of the older Mr. Smallweed was also a highlight - he could never be a favorite character, but Mr. Barrett's characterization of him was priceless.
It's Dickens - so you have to cry, for example at the fate of Joe, and laugh, for example at the ridiculous Mrs Guppy or old Mr. Turveydrop. Don't be fooled by the name - Bleak House is a very happy book in many ways.
The book is "written" by two people, the narrator, whose "voice" is taken by Mr. Barrett, and Esther, whose diary or memoir is read by Ms. Gallagher. This works really well, as it's a long book and the changes in reader keep the listening experience fresh. The only downside is that when characters appear in both narrations, they can have different voices: Mr Guppy survived the process, but Mr. Snagsby was unrecognizable. A minor quibble on an otherwise exceptional audiobook.
I enjoyed this book as it was read by two different people so you didnt get bored with the reader. I love Charles Dickens books. I will be ordering others books of his. The next one will be Oliver Twist.
"Slow but stick with it"
Long and laborious but gratifying as a story eventually. Pleased I stuck with it. In the days of scandal, smallpox, death and honour the story unfolds and the characters come to life. Well done to the narrators
"Still a rich and friity story.."
As we socially return to 19th century values this story tells of what we can expect.
Property, littigation, ruin and pomp.
"Into the Desert"
Dickens' ”Bleak House” is perhaps his most celebrated novel, a pioneering work that, if there is talk of the literary canon, usually has a rather prominent place reserved for it. It's full of remarkable writing, among that writing the classic descriptions of London and the fog; it's commended for its structure, and complex array of characters and their interactions. In short, it's a classic, Dickens at his most Dickens.
And I'm so glad it's over. This was supposed to be right up my alley: I had read ”David Copperfield” and was completely immersed, as I loved the language, the style, the atmosphere. The narrative is broken into two parts, that of an apparently omniscient narrator and that of Esther, and these two narrative threads ricochet, swerve and intermingle. The first fifty pages are utterly exhilarating in their beauty and poetry, but I wasn't expecting the book ironically to turn into a big, never-ending Jarndyce and Jarndyce with no end in sight: I think the idea, generally, is a very good one, the mystery works, and the social aspect adds a realistic dimension to it all, especially since Dickens had first-hand experience of the legal system. But the main flaw of the book, for me, was that it just dragged too long for its own sake so that what pulse there was had, halfway through, become a mere memory.
I wasn't too enthralled by any of the characters, either. I had difficulty with Esther's narrative, especially, where everything happens during the golden hour or the rosy-fingered dawn, or is, in other ways, full of sweetness and dearness, and little else. Since I've only read ”David Copperfield” I'm not really in the position to say, but so far it seems that it's the main character who has the misfortune to be the channel through which all things happen, but who seems to have little to contribute on one's own. I'm surprised that I'd yearn for the classic device of change in the character so much, but I think Esther, and many of the other characters, exist primarily in a stasis, or vacuum, without much gravitational force to pull them either way.
The narration has its pros and cons. On one hand, both Barrett and Gallagher do a good job with the material, often emphasizing the caricatures, but on the other, the text itself is so long that it's difficult to carry it through, even with two narrators. It doesn't help that Gallagher has to deal with Esther's narrative, which, as to my complaint, isn't all that interesting and offers very little.
I'm trying to make sense of my feelings to myself as much as to you, who might have unhappily stumbled upon this review. One thing that didn't help was that while I listened to ”Bleak House” had another reading project going on, that being Thomas Pynchon's incomparable ”Mason & Dixon”, a work of an equally gifted, or even more gifted, master of the language. In many ways my experience with Pynchon mirrored with ”Bleak House”: when Pynchon was wild fun, Dickens offered surprisingly few moments of glee; while Pynchon was able to weave a complex narrative that moved unpredictably, Dickens' narrative, with its many ”surprises”, felt like it just wandered off into the desert unprepared, stalling and hoping to get out alive. Whether it did, I'm not quite sure. I'm certain, however, to re-evaluate whether I'll have to guts to try ”The Pickwick Papers” anytime soon, as I already have it in my library. I think I'll go somewhere else first.
"Beautifully narrated sprawling mass of a novel!"
Sean Barrett and Teresa Gallagher do a tremendous job narrating this sprawling narrative which doesn’t have the focus or thematic centre of many of Dickens’ other tales. Parts had me laughing out loud, parts were really engaging - there are the elements of social commentary and class issues we'd expect from Dickens. However, it could be tighter, but overall I'm glad I invested the time.
"Outstanding story and audiobook"
I have listened to several Dickens audiobooks now, and for me it is the BEST way to discover these novels, which can look so daunting on the shelf. I found the two narrators absolutely superb and their accents and characterizations wholly convincing, and certainly enough to reduce me to tears on more than one occasion. Dickens' incisive parody of the legal profession is still absolutely relevant today, while the genuine goodness of many of the characters is inspiring (however one-dimensional some of them may be!). Whole-heartedly recommended for the richness and humanity of the story, the portrait it paints of the law system, social welfare and 1850s society in general, and the narration that brings it to life.
"With Dickens you get what you expect!"
Audiobooks are a great way to catch up with those classics you avoided through school and life. The characters within this compelling work appear as vivid caricatures of what life must have been like in those times. Not a beach book by any means, but a must for the collection.
This is a wonderful web of life lines that Dickens weaves with sublime expertise. At the back of it is his loathing of the corrupt and inefficient legal system, but the dual narration constantly leaves you wondering just who knows what. It has prompted me to revisit the wonderful BBC series of 2006, where Gillian Anderson plays Lady Dedlock. Having recently enjoyed Little Dorrit I was apprehensive that Bleak House might not have been as good, but I need not have worried.
Not only is this a great work of literature, but the two actors are superb, voicing each of the many characters carefully and amusingly.Thoroughly recommended!
Report Inappropriate Content