Charles Dickens (1812 - 9 June 1870) is arguably the greatest novelist England ever produced.
Please note: This is a vintage recording. The audio quality may not be up to modern day standards.
Since I have been listening to mostly classics lately, I will answer this by saying in the top 20 at least. Other reviewers have said that they couldn't get into the story. It was not the case for me. I have enjoyed every single moment of this book. (Yes, even with George Hagan's mistakes). I bought this book a long time ago and finally got around to listening to it. And I have enjoyed it thoroughly.
Barnaby Rudge probably because of his being simple and his always cheerfulness and fresh look on life.
I listened to Nicholas Nickleby and enjoyed that performance. This one compares to it equally.
Too long for that. But if I could've, I might have.
This was Charles Dickens first attempt at an historical novel years before he did "A Tale Of Two Cities." Not knowing much about the Gordon Riots, I have learned a lot about them just from listening to this book. I would say Mr. Dickens did a good job on this book and I could see how this helped prepare him for "A Tale Of Two Cities" later on in his writing career.
Maybe that excludes me from writing a review, but this book has so many unengaging characters that I just couldn't stay with it. If there's a plot, it's too obscure or scattered for me to follow. George Hagan tries his best but I wonder if any reader could render this into a meaningful novel. Maybe it's just me.
This novel is not rated among Dickens' best works. Sadly the reader quickly grasps why.
In general, it is difficult to identify or even sympathize with any character. In particular, many of the characters are just strange. Barnaby Rudge himself is, as Dickens puts it, an "idiot boy". His pet is a raven ... who actually speaks sentences, though admittedly with a croaky voice. Readers also encounter a brutal hangman and a blind beggar who manages to travel by foot through the 18th century English countryside.
This very long historical novel is set in the context of little known anti-Catholic riots. The plot is convoluted and very difficult to follow. Unexpectedly from Dickens, much violence is described in detail, mostly against property but also against human beings. The narrator sides with reason against prejudice but the reader still feels uneasy.
Definitely, this work is recommended only to die-hard Dickens fans.
I enjoyed the story but was disappointed in the reading of it, the narrator was full of stumbles and mistakes - and corrections. His voice was beautiful and mellifluous - I felt that the book being so long tested the narrator's ability.
"Very poorly narrated!"
While the book itself is what you'd expect from Charlie Dickens, unfortunately the narration will drive you mad ... it's clearly not edited, and the mistakes the reader makes come frequently. I tried several times to listen, but have given up.
"All the better for being unknown to me."
Less popular and rarely dramatised, I had no advance knowledge of the characters or the plot, so it was brand new classic Dickens, of the earlier variety, to me which was fantastic. I enjoyed it far more than anticipated.
I really enjoy this narrator even though I think the recording is very old, and of course, fabulous story!
Report Inappropriate Content