Check out more selections from Oprah's Book Club.
(P)2005 Random House, Inc. Random House Audio, a division of Random House, Inc.
"For range of effect, philosophical weight, originality of style, variety of characterization, humor, and tragic intensity, [Faulkner's works] are without equal in our time and country". (Robert Penn Warren)
As a Faulknerian scholar, I was pleasantly surprised by this audio rendition of one of Faulkner's complex works. I used this recording to assist a blind peer who was studying the novel, and I read my copy along with the recorded reading to help establish and clarify the characters' points of view, especially with regards to the sections involving stream of consciousness.
Together, we found the use of multiple readers helped distinguish the different narrators of this work. We thoroughly approved of the readers' Southern accents and (being from the South)found very few flaws in that regard. A few artistic interpretations of the stream of consciousness sections were distracting, as the readers chose to add punctuation rather than flow rapidly from one thought to the next without breaks. This did not take away from the story as a whole, but I did need to clarify this for the academic purposes of my peer.
All in all, this was an excellent rendition of Faulkner's novel. I am pleased to have this recording in my permanent library.
Having a lengthy daily commute, I have listened to over a hundred recorded books and this one is absolutely among the best I have heard! Faulkner's writing begs to be read out loud and this recording was beautiful, capturing you in its slow southern spell.
The multiple voices are simply wonderful and, having read this in hard copy many times over the years, I had some trepidations about listening. However the words are as powerful as they are in print and have the added quality of staying as the voices of a "play" in your head. Terrific.
I use this "tour de force" novel in my high school English class, and I've found that the audio helps the students follow the story better. I personally enjoy the narrators who with their use of dialects are able to add life to the characters, even Addie, who is dead for most of the novel.
Business Physicist and Astronomer
Faulkner is not an easy read. Expect to go back often and really listen to the story. Expect to look up some notes and commentary to grasp what the hell is going on. Expect to struggle with lines like, "My mother is a fish"
Expect to WORK through this book.
And expect the best of literature and performance. Expect to learn. Expect to expand your insight into frustration and futility. Expect to feel pain.
This is a great piece of literature and it's very well delivered.
Worth the effort.
The multiple narrators of this audiobook bring the story to life: a grim tale of poverty and death with an unexpected dash of hilariously dark humor. A woman is dying and is finally dead, and her husband and children set out with the coffin on a journey to her home town. The language is colorful and concrete and filled with incantatory repetitions of certain phrases. It's the ultimate jinxed road trip, cursed at times with what appear to be all the plagues of Egypt. Without giving away too much, I'll just say, to paraphrase the Bible: where there's a dead body, the vultures will gather. This saying may have originally been intended as a metaphor, but in Faulkner's beautifully poetic prose, you can hear the flapping of wings.
My interests run to psychology, popular science, history, world literature, and occasionally something fun like Jasper Fforde. It seems like the only free time I have for reading these days is when I'm in the car so I am extremely grateful for audio books. I started off reading just the contemporary stuff that I was determined not to clutter up my already stuffed bookcases with. And now audio is probably 90% of my "reading" matter.
What makes this book interesting is not the story. The story is pretty banal. What makes this book interesting is the characters, and the insight into how people feel and think, and the dynamics that develop within a family or any other group of people. Faulkner was a brilliant innovator of stream-of-consciousness and other modern narrative devices. I appreciate him more the more I read of him. A lot of writing presupposes that people think in words, but Faulkner tries to express the non-verbal feelings we have drawing from the words we would use if we had the time and the vocabulary to sort them all out. I think this accounts for some of the poetical imagery we get from characters who would not otherwise think some of the thoughts Faulkner ascribes to them.
The travails of the Bundren family are painful to watch. They all have their secrets from each other. They are all flawed individuals. They have barely held together as a family. Watching them all stumble through the trial of dealing with Addie's death makes you wonder how they can possibly all stay together much longer. But there are counterforces at work too.
One thing I cannot understand is how a 270 page book can be narrated in under 7 hours. I guess I will have to go look at a paper copy and try to figure it out.
The use of 4 readers for this book is extremely helpful in sorting out which of the 15 narrators is speaking at any given time. In general I give them high marks for conveying Faulkner's language and coping with the ambiguities of stream-of-consciousness writing. The one exception I have to comment on is the voice chosen for Dewey Dell. The reader chooses to make Dewey Dell into a kind of wispy, ethereal, dreamy teenager. She fails to capture any of the sullen, angry adolescent that Faulkner constantly hints is at the core of Dewey Dell's character.
However, that minor complaint in no way detracts from the overall quality of this audiobook. It's not about Dewey Dell, any more than it is about Anse, Cash, Darl, Jewel, Vardamon or even Addie. It's ultimately about something else. Something I don't know how to express. Faulkner knew how to express it, but it took him a whole book to do it.
I focus on fiction, sci-fi, fantasy, science, history, politics and read a lot. I try to review everything I read.
This classic does not really tell a story or develop characters but instead expresses ideas about life through constantly shifting stream of consciousness and inner monologs. The narration fluidly shifts from character to character and inner to outer. There are dozens of points of view and single characters represent multiple narrations. Events are non-linear and repeated from multiple perspectives.
This is a difficult listen and the multiple readers helps, but the audible version is still harder to follow than the written work. If you haven’t read this book on paper, I wouldn’t recommend the audio and a first way to experience the material. If you have already read the book and enjoyed it, you will likely find the audible version interestingly different. If you read the book and did not understand what was going on, you might give the audible version a try.
The four narrators were excellent, but still could quite handle the many narrator points of view as well as my inner voice when reading the print version.
Faulkner. I've read his other works and this one left me feeling cheated. I went on the journey with him and, when we got there, I was looking around thinking "why did I read this, again?" The characters were uninteresting. The story was lacking.Whatever could have been told was lost in the ramblings of "stream of consciousness." It's like long division ... sure, you can get to the answer that way, but why would you?
Written something else ... and given up "stream of consciousness" writing.
Sure. I think they did a fine job. The producers were brilliant in getting multiple narrators. In fact, they could have had more. Faulkner is so inconsiderate to his readers in that he gives his characters no introduction, no context, no "who are these people" which makes it absolutely necessary to have different voices. It was like Faulkner decided, laughing to himself, to write whatever came into his mind, didn't feel like reading back over it to see if it made any sense, then went straight to production with it. The artist has a duty to meet their audience somewhere along the line. He failed here. Will Patton, in Faulkner's "Light in August" is an awesome narrator. One of the best I've heard, along with Stacy Keach in Hemingway.
I would sit Faulkner down and ask him, "Will, level with me here. What is the point? Are you trying to prove that you can do the "Stream of Consciousness" thing too? I don't see a story here. I see you, the writer, trying to prove something and maybe you'll get lucky and some "artsy" types will rave about it. William, is that what is going on? I think you should stick to your bread and butter, telling great stories that really change people, and knock off the gimmicky stuff. Seriously. You're from Mississippi. Have you ever heard of any person in that state, or anywhere that communicated that way? If you want to do poetry, fine. Do poetry. If you want to write novels, fine. Write novels. But don't do this. Don't mix and mash it all together along with some ramblings about "is is" and "once was is." What is that? I know what you were getting at but why go about it that way? You owe it to your readers to give them a little bit more."
Don't give up on Faulkner for this one. Read "Light in August," the one narrated by Will Patton. It will affect you; it will draw you in. It's a shame that "As I Lay Dying" has received so much attention. I think it does a disservice to the other great works he wrote. People go for this one, get burned on it, then turn their back on Faulkner altogether.
Yes. If you love diving into the twisted mind of writer like Poe and Faulkner you will love this twisted tell.
Spoiler alert ... I don't like that Darl was used as a scapegoat to end the story. It is as if Faulkner just got tired of the characters and abruptly ended the story with out tying up loose ends.
The Narrators give a different voice to each character allowing the reader to follow the story more easily.
Yes. I would love to read what happens to Darl and Dewey Dale after mamma is buried
"A stream of voices in the dry wilderness?."
The key to this book is the disparate voices of the same family that find their way to us across the divide of time, location, culture and context. A book that is a struggle from the start - 15 different narrators in 59 chapters - but a journey that becomes easier as we are helped with the burden of unfamiliar language and strange circumstances by a great narration team. The Stream of consciousness technique was refined from its European source by Faulkner and we see its full glory here - on the trail to Jefferson, Mississippi. Not Agamemnon to Odysseus as the title suggests, but a dirt poor family in the throes of their own sad Odyssey.
Great stuff ? a really difficult book well delivered ? it?s what makes Audible so valuable.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.