Hers is a life of extraordinary drama as a witness to and participant in the greatest events of Henry's reign. Her supposed part in both Anne Boleyn's and Catherine Howard's downfall has led to her being reviled through the centuries.
In this fascinating biography, Julia Fox repudiates the idea of the infamous Lady Rochford, and Jane emerges as a rather modern woman forced by brutal circumstances to fend for herself in a politically lethal world.
©2007 Julia Fox; (P)2008 Oakhill Publishing Ltd
"Ecstasy. This bio offers a dramatic writing, new info and a moving re-examination of a woman wronged for centuries by historians." (Pittsburgh Tribune-Review)
I found the pace a little slow at times, but there are great details about the lavish dress and surroundings that make it possible to visualize the events. It taught me a lot about the British culture at the time. It is also nice to get a different view of a woman with such a dark cloud over her reputation.
This is the worse excuse for a biography I've ever read. Three-quarters of it is the story of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn, rehashed yet again, with embarrassing comments like "Jane probably knew about this" or "Jane may have felt this about that". Jane Boleyn plays as merely a background character in her own biography! The INFAMOUS Lady Rochford, indeed. Infamous for what? Being a bit player in the drama of Henry VIII's serial marriages? If you're going to write someone's biography, some FACTS would be nice. As is, this is naught but a series of "may have's" and "probably's".
I really enjoyed this audio book. Fact and fiction have so completely warped other books that it was nice to see an author took the time to research the subject before writting the book. I recommend it to anyone who would like a different point of view on Jane Boleyn and the times she lived in.
What seemed like such a promising story about Jane Boleyn turned out to be a textbook-style narration of people and events centered around Anne and Henry. The author involves Jane in almost ridiculous reminders that the book is titled after her -- for example, after lengthy descriptions of Anne's life and events, the author uses phrases like, "Jane would surely have seen this, and probably felt happy for her sister-in-law." There is no real story about any of the people in the book, just a descriptive timeline of sorts, with occasional references to where Jane may have been, what she might have thought about her in-laws, and what she may have worn. I'm almost finished listening and, truthfully, I don't even want to continue, as I'd rather be entertained than lectured to.
I wish I read all the reviews before I bought this one. This is a great story about the court of Henry VIII but it is not about Jane Boleyn. It is well written and provides a great overview of the events but does not give any insight into the life or motivation of this interesting woman.
This book is exceptional. The life at Henry VIII court has been written and rewritten, one would think there was nothing left to write. However a woman's point of view is fresh and outstanding! Historically accurate accounts are the only books I like to read as I want to learn something about the places and times I am reading about. Ann Boleyn's sister-in-law describes it in wonderful detail, the gowns, jewels and relationships. Read this book :-)
I was expecting an insightful history, instead I got a lecture from a particularly flat-voiced narrator. Perfect for putting me to sleep.
This is one of my favorite bits of history. Anne Boleyn accomplished much in her thousand days, and those who touched her life deserve better treatment than this.
Loved the storytelling - at first I thought the narrator speaking for several people (male and female) was little odd, but it started to grow on me and actually enjoyed it a lot! Especially speaking for the Spanish ambassador was initially jarring but - it works! I really got a sense of his character. I am glad I bought this audible.
"This felt more like a text book than fun to read."
While very interesting and full of facts, if this had not been an audio-book I would never have ploughed through to the end. The 10 minute long explanations of how a dowery had been calculated nearly made me drift into another lane on the motorway one day!
Because she wasn't quite important enough to be recorded in documents at the time, there is a lot of supposition in this book about where Jane is at certain times, and who she would be with and why.
I think anybody reading anything about history understands this, which is why when you read six authors versions of the life of a Queen you will get six different accounts, as writers fill in the blanks themselves. At least that would have been entertaining.
"OK...but no coconut"
Lots of background info about how Jane would have lived at court, what she owned, where she stayed etc
Possibly...although mostly well reserched, she does get several peices of well known history wrong.
Not badly read, but needs to slow down between chapters...she tends to run them into each other.
Possibly to read other books about Jane Rochford...the author had made up her mind that she was an innocent victim of circumstance, which may be true but she seemed biased towards her and glossed over several relevent incidents far too quickly or left them out. Not up to the standard of Alison Weirs books.
The author relys alot on 'Jane must have felt' and the like very heavily throughout this book...it is hard as there is not a great deal of detail known about Jane Rochford, but it does get anoying after a while!
much more info on lady Rochford
more a history lesson than a book about the lady in the title
how can you cut people out of history
it seemed to me like a lot of guess work. Like she may have been there or she may have known.Or she would have known???
"Interesting history, distracting voice"
Author Julia Fox tells her tale vividly and in a well-constructed way, and I appreciated her occasional reference to specific historical sources. The book comes across well in audio format. However, Julia Barrie's voice - which may be familiar to other listeners from the rest of her spoken-word work - was both a distraction and a disappointment for me. Light in tenor, she sounds at times barely out of her teens, which robbed Fox's script of much weight and gave the story a breathless ingenue, schoolgirl air it didn't deserve; her occasional mispronunciations (for example eMISSary instead of EMissary, and BadaHO instead of BadaHOTH) suggest poor studio monitoring. Despite these irritations, the recording was good enough to while away a long train journey. I shall listen to Part 2, as I want to hear the rest of Fox's story; but I shall avoid further Barrie readings.
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content