We are currently making improvements to the Audible site. In an effort to enhance the accessibility experience for our customers, we have created a page to more easily navigate the new experience, available at the web address www.audible.com/access.
Call anytime(888) 283-5051
Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House | [Peter Baker]

Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House

Theirs was the most captivating American political partnership since Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger: a bold and untested president and his seasoned, relentless vice president. Confronted by one crisis after another, they struggled to protect the country, remake the world, and define their own relationship along the way. In Days of Fire, Peter Baker chronicles the history of the most consequential presidency in modern times through the prism of its two most compelling characters, capturing the elusive and shifting alliance of George Walker Bush and Richard Bruce Cheney as no historian has done before.
Regular Price:$49.00
  • Membership Details:
    • First book free with 30-day trial
    • $14.95/month thereafter for your choice of 1 new book each month
    • Cancel easily anytime
    • Exchange books you don't like
    • All selected books are yours to keep, even if you cancel
  • - or -

Your Likes make Audible better!

'Likes' are shared on Facebook and Audible.com. We use your 'likes' to improve Audible.com for all our listeners.

You can turn off Audible.com sharing from your Account Details page.

OK

Publisher's Summary

In Days of Fire, Peter Baker, Chief White House Correspondent for The New York Times, takes us on a gripping and intimate journey through the eight years of the Bush and Cheney administration in a tour-de-force narrative of a dramatic and controversial presidency.

Theirs was the most captivating American political partnership since Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger: a bold and untested president and his seasoned, relentless vice president. Confronted by one crisis after another, they struggled to protect the country, remake the world, and define their own relationship along the way. In Days of Fire, Peter Baker chronicles the history of the most consequential presidency in modern times through the prism of its two most compelling characters, capturing the elusive and shifting alliance of George Walker Bush and Richard Bruce Cheney as no historian has done before. He brings to life with in-the-room immediacy all the drama of an era marked by devastating terror attacks, the Iraq War, Hurricane Katrina, and financial collapse.

The real story of Bush and Cheney is a far more fascinating tale than the familiar suspicion that Cheney was the power behind the throne. Drawing on hundreds of interviews with key players, and thousands of pages of never-released notes, memos, and other internal documents, Baker paints a riveting portrait of a partnership that evolved dramatically over time, from the early days when Bush leaned on Cheney, making him the most influential vice president in history, to their final hours, when the two had grown so far apart they were clashing in the West Wing. Together and separately, they were tested as no other president and vice president have been, first on a bright September morning, an unforgettable "day of fire" just months into the presidency, and on countless days of fire over the course of eight tumultuous years.

Days of Fire is a monumental and definitive work that will rank with the best of presidential histories. As absorbing as a thriller, it is eye-opening and essential listening.

©2013 Peter Baker (P)2013 Random House Audio

What the Critics Say

"Peter Baker tells the story of Bush and Cheney with the precision of a crack reporter and the eye and ear of a novelist. This is perhaps the most consequential pairing of a president and vice president in our history. And Baker captures it all - the triumphs and defeats, the partnership and eventual estrangement. It is a splendid mix of sweeping history and telling anecdotes that will keep you turning the page." (Chris Wallace, anchor of Fox News Sunday)

"9/11, two long wars, a crushing recession, neo-cons, and turf wars defined the first decade of 21st-century American politics. In the middle of it all, the president and his powerful vice-president. The complicated and then contentious relationship between Bush and Cheney is worthy of Shakespeare. Peter Baker’s Days of Fire is a book for every presidential hopeful and every citizen." (Tom Brokaw, author of The Greatest Generation)

What Members Say

Average Customer Rating

4.3 (119 )
5 star
 (55)
4 star
 (46)
3 star
 (12)
2 star
 (5)
1 star
 (1)
Overall
4.3 (104 )
5 star
 (55)
4 star
 (33)
3 star
 (13)
2 star
 (3)
1 star
 (0)
Story
4.5 (104 )
5 star
 (56)
4 star
 (42)
3 star
 (5)
2 star
 (1)
1 star
 (0)
Performance
Sort by:
  •  
    Scott Scarborough, ON, Canada 11-15-13
    Scott Scarborough, ON, Canada 11-15-13 Member Since 2006
    HELPFUL VOTES
    64
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    164
    63
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    4
    4
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "A balanced account of the W and Cheney White House"
    Any additional comments?

    First off, I'll admit I was no fan of George W Bush yet still the man intrigued me. Could he really be as dumb, arrogant, and stubborn as his persona suggests? Well, according to this well written account of his White House years, the answer is yes and no. This is a nicely nuanced portrait of the Bush and Cheney partnership that really only lasted he first term of the presidency. All of Bush's failings are in display here and the author links these in subtle ways with W's character flaws. At the same time, this is hardly a hatchet job. Undeniably the Bush presidency was a time of monumental challenges, some of Bush and Cheney's own making, some not. The influence of each man on the other is depicted in an almost Shakespearian tragic way as initial successes lead to epic failures and estrangement. A compelling read that will likely not satisfy hard core Bush apologists or detractors, this is well worth the read for anyone seeking a better understanding of he partner ship that made he White House tick.

    11 of 11 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Jean Santa Cruz, CA, United States 07-30-14
    Jean Santa Cruz, CA, United States 07-30-14 Member Since 2010

    I am an avid eclectic reader.

    HELPFUL VOTES
    3248
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    655
    618
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    573
    12
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "An objective viewpoint"

    I hesitated in getting this book, I was not sure if the book was going to be a whitewash job or acrimonious, but instead I found it to be objective report. Peter Baker is a White House reporter for the New York Times. I find he has written a through, engaging and objective history of the Bush-Cheney years in the White House.

    Baker states Vice President Cheney was the most powerful vice president in history. He did more than anyone to shape counter terrorism policy after the 9/11 attack and lead us into war in Iraq. In the second term Cheney looked and acted more like the traditional vice president. President Bush generally pursued a more centrist course on many or most of the issues-over Cheney’s objection. One of the questions in the book, was Cheney always an ultra conservative Republican or did the repeated heart problems cause him to change? Before Bush left office he set up the programs to bail out of the banks and the car companies in an attempt to slow down or stop the recession/depression. The historical judgments of the Bush administration are only beginning to take shape. It has taken several years for the key people to write their memoirs and for the presidents’ friend and subordinates to offer stories they wouldn’t volunteer at the time the Bush team was in the White House. Baker painstakingly worked through all the books published so far and interviewed over 200 people for this book.

    I found the section of the book about selecting judges most interesting. I noticed that Bush selected the people whose job it was to find, obtain information on and interview attorneys for judgeship even before moving into the White House. He set about filling every vacancy on all Federal courts. He also had staff looking for a Supreme Court justice, at that time Chief Justice Rehnquist was ill and most likely would be resigning soon. Bush was surprised and pleased to be able to appoint two justices as that would change the balance of the Court. He was looking for someone who was conservative and would not change after being appointed as did Justice Souter. I noted Bush called and spoke to each person appointed to a judgeship, so they would know that he was involved in their appointment. Baker claimed no other president, had called to speak to appointees of the lower courts. Baker spent several chapters describing in detail the court selection process. As I have been reading about the Supreme Court and the legal system recently, I was excited to learn about the process from the viewpoint of the presiding President.

    The book traces the upbringing and early careers of both Bush and Cheney and follows them to the end of their time in the White House. The author’s book is notable for its scope and ambition. I am sure it will become a reference source for historians in the future. The process of disillusionment which culminated in Bush’s refusal to pardon Cheney’s aid Scooter Libby forms the heart of the book. Mark Deakins did an excellent job narrating the book.

    3 of 3 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Amazon Customer Rochester, MN, United States 01-10-14
    Amazon Customer Rochester, MN, United States 01-10-14 Member Since 2007

    Just like you, I spend my money here and am not on any author's payroll :)

    HELPFUL VOTES
    40
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    119
    12
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    3
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "The 9/11 Parts Are Very Emotional"

    Overall - very good and well worth the listen.

    The last portion of Part I and into Part II are very emotional as the author describes how Bush reacted to and handled 9/11 in real time. I was moved to tears also during certain parts of that portion of the recording. Dubya handled it the best anyone could do at the time, and although I have issues with the rest of his presidency...the description of that period and how he and Cheney handled it are worth the entire cost of the title.

    3 of 3 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Arn M. San Francisco, CA 04-15-14
    Arn M. San Francisco, CA 04-15-14 Member Since 2014

    Geopolitics, history, and philosophy junkie. I love smoothly flowing prose that moves me effortlessly from one idea to the next.

    HELPFUL VOTES
    3
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    18
    12
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "History without bias"
    What made the experience of listening to Days of Fire the most enjoyable?

    The objectivity of the research, often giving multiple examples equally, was the most refreshing part.


    What was the most compelling aspect of this narrative?

    Logically ordered


    Which character – as performed by Mark Deakins – was your favorite?

    Not sure


    Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

    At 27 hours long, impossible. But I certainly didn't want to stop midway.


    Any additional comments?

    A well told true historical account without the trickle of revisionism that often pervades such recent polarizing figures.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful
  •  
    R. Anderson seattle, WA Yankland 08-26-14
    R. Anderson seattle, WA Yankland 08-26-14 Member Since 2009

    rick

    HELPFUL VOTES
    4
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    14
    12
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    0
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Best memoir of the Bush years"
    What did you love best about Days of Fire?

    The author writes a very objective memoir of the Bush years. This is a great story because the author tells the interesting a relevant facts without bogging you down in details/dates/too many names.


    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Rosie 07-12-14
    Rosie 07-12-14 Member Since 2006
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    4
    2
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Quotes from Bush and Cheney - Their spin"
    What did you like best about Days of Fire? What did you like least?

    Worth while listening to since it gave some insight on how the decisions were made, although I don't believe we will ever really know why we went into Iraq. The loudest part of the book was what it didn't say or what it skimmed over but all that information is available other places. For instance, check the public records for Aloha Airlines.

    As far as the comedians painting Bush as not too bright, liberals realized at the time, that this nonsense was coming from people who exaggerate such as Jay Leno. It would be a mistake to get any information from any comedian such as Leno or Limbaugh.

    One thing that did change my view of Bush was that I now realize that he was open to change; particularly since he got so burnt by relying on others to do the thinking in his first term, that he was able to change and made major decisions by himself in the second term.


    0 of 0 people found this review helpful
  •  
    Joseph San Diego, CA, United States 12-08-13
    Joseph San Diego, CA, United States 12-08-13 Member Since 2009
    HELPFUL VOTES
    6
    ratings
    REVIEWS
    81
    3
    FOLLOWERS
    FOLLOWING
    0
    2
    Overall
    Performance
    Story
    "Liberal media more than fair to Bush and Cheney."
    What would have made Days of Fire better?

    While the facts seem pretty damning, the administration of George W. Bush receives an almost fawning treatment as a history. NY Times White House correspondent Peter Baker relies too heavily on inside accounts of what happened during America's lost decade. Presidential official insiders give their slanted view and spin on the disaster caused by all the wrong decisions. History would be better served by a more critical voices and more insightful analysis.


    What other book might you compare Days of Fire to and why?

    Washington Post reporter Barton Gellman's "Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency" provides keener analysis and far more revealing reporting on how Cheney became the power behind the throne. The book provides many revelations and behind the scenes details than Baker's book.


    What about Mark Deakins’s performance did you like?

    The narrator does a fantastic job to keep the listener involved.


    You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

    The book writes a sympathetic history of the George W. Bush. Republicans will love this book as it seems to vindicate all the bad decisions made. As a student of history or as a Democrat, most readers will find this book lacks balance.


    Any additional comments?

    If you think Bush was a great President, buy this audiobook. If you are a Democrat, the memories of this worst President of modern times will be painful. So much for the liberal media, the New York Times gives him a passing grade.

    5 of 16 people found this review helpful
  • Showing: 1-7 of 7 results

    There are no listener reviews for this title yet.

Report Inappropriate Content

If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.

Cancel

Thank You

Your report has been received. It will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.