George W. Bush, the 43rd president of the United States, almost single-handedly decided to invade Iraq. It was possibly the worst foreign-policy decision ever made by a president. The consequences dominated the Bush administration and still haunt us today.
In Bush, Jean Edward Smith demonstrates that it was not Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, or Condoleezza Rice but President Bush himself who took personal control of foreign policy. Bush drew on his deep religious conviction that important foreign-policy decisions were simply a matter of good versus evil. Domestically, he overreacted to 9/11 and endangered Americans' civil liberties. Smith explains that it wasn't until the financial crisis of 2008 that Bush finally accepted expert advice, something that "the Decider", as Bush called himself, had previously been unwilling to do. As a result he authorized decisions that saved the economy from possible collapse, even though some of those decisions violated Bush's own political philosophy.
©2016 Jean Edward Smith (P)2016 Tantor
In a peaceful, verdant valley on the Equator, the sun always sets at 6, and a good audiobook is always the perfect evening companion
If, like me, you thought of George W. Bush as an intellectual lightweight who was manipulated by Cheney, Rumsfeld, and all the other neoconservatives in launching a devastating war for fabricated reasons, prepare to be surprised.
He was much worse than that.
With the meticulous and persuasive “Bush,” Jean Edward Smith methodically dismantles the prevailing misconceptions of the 43rd president, who reveled in his role as Commander in Chief and wasn’t kidding when he announced, “I’m the decider.” He was. He made firm, crisp decisions, often without much thought.
Smith chronicles Bush’s early years as a back-slapping, hard-drinking son of privilege, parlaying his achievements as Texas governor and his born-again conversion into an improbable run for the presidency. Far from being duped by subordinates, he was a quiet Christian zealot who—whether supporting childhood education or laying waste to Iraq—believed without question he was doing God’s will. It was to him a Higher Authority that outranked both the Constitution and international law. Cheney and others were all too willing to follow his lead.
When intelligence didn’t demonstrate that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, Bush didn’t push for more. What he pushed for was better marketing, to persuade the American public that the invasion he had already irrevocably decided upon was justified. It wasn’t faulty intelligence, it was orchestrated lies about what the intelligence really said.
It is clear that Bush was determined to vanquish Iraq long before the 9/11 attack on New York.
“Bush” is filled with detailed anecdotes (the hardcover is 832 pages long), such as his futile attempt to convince the French to join the coalition against Saddam. It’s what led Bush partisans to label the French as cowards, and to rename French fries as “freedom fries” in the Congressional cafeterias.
The French declined to join in the invasion, not for lack of courage, but because Jacques Chirac was shocked when Bush told him the war was mandated by the Book of Revelations. At that moment, Chirac knew that the failure to find WMD would never be enough to deter Bush.
Smith writes, “For Bush the coming attack [on Iraq] would mark the beginning of the final battle to rid the world of evil. He may or may not have believed it would be a cakewalk, but he was certain it was God’s will.”
That invasion was seen by most of the world as a war of US aggression. At the UN, Kofi Annan flatly called it “illegal.”
For Bush, everything was a self-righteous holy war against “the axis of evil,” the obvious implication being that he had no business serving as Commander in Chief. The smug, unconditional certainty that derived from a born-again religious conviction carried the world into war that may never end. Not to mention the great recession that followed.
Together with a massive aggregation of particulars by the author, the narration by Tom Perkins contributes much to the credibility of “Bush.” His delivery is straightforward, unemotional, and free of any implied opinion that could easily surface amid the damning details. The book is highly critical of Bush, yet far too meticulous to be dismissed as an opinionated hatchet job.
The former president has often said that history will be kind to his legacy. Smith’s conclusion that Bush “may have been the worst president in U.S. history” is not a very good start.
Most people don't like to be reminded of our errors but it is helpful to understand the many ways in which the Bush43 presidency went wrong. Smith has chronicled these 8 years and more with measured prose and does not engage in piling on when that would be the all too human instinct. Never again, folks.
A comprehensive look at the life, accomplishments, and failings of the 43rd president. Smith is no fan, considering Bush's presidency as a monumental failure though he does credit him with several successes such as his campaign to combat AIDS in Africa and his response to the 2008 financial crisis. In other words, Smith treads on no new ground here. This is worthy history but thin biography. A reader looking for insights into what made Bush tick, his younger years, or his relationships will find slim pickings here.
We all know the main events of Bush's presidency, now we see the story "behind the curtain". The author is well respected and gives a balanced account. I found it enthralling.
Making my way through all the US President a biography at a time.
The author is well accomplished with past biographies which have hugely impressed me for there ability to balance narrative and detail. The start of this biography made me doubt he was sufficiently independent to achieve this with Bush (43). However, what I have come to expect in detail and story telling returned after early chapters. It is well worth the read - though the performance of the narrator is at times comical for his wish to 'do' voice for each person.
Mr Smith's work deserves much praise for its clarity and entertainment value. However, as a work of history, I believe this book falls just short. Too much emphasis is put on inferring exactly the inner workings of Bush's thought process, when this information could not be known by the author.
I think it is about as good a job as possible without actually being able to interview the subject of the book, however, that doesn't excuse the presentation of opinion as fact.
I am not a great fan of Bush and it was fabulous to have WHY spelled out in detail. A fascinating look into the inside details of Bush's presidency. However, I don't think it warranted 25 hours or whatever. Nonetheless, I enjoyed it thoroughly. The reader is completely emotionless as he reads through absolutely unbelievable things, and this made it all the more enjoyable.
This is as fair and balanced of a history of the George W. Bush administration as it is possible to write at this point in time. It is too favorable to Dick Cheney and perhaps Donald Rumsfeld, but this probably is due to their active cooperation with the author in his writing of the book. Very well written and the analysis is spot on. It should be mandatory reading for any politician.
Interesting, detailed, objective
The earlier part of the book that talks about Bush's early life and challenges and how they made and shaped the man he became later. It was well done and conveyed empathy with Bush, even if you may not have agreed with or even liked him as president.
The man behind the Presidency
The author is clearly not a Bush fan, but I did not find the book overly anti-Bush in tone. I felt he took effort to present objective facts and details in an interesting, narrative way, and drew conclusions based on the facts.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.