In this exuberantly praised book - a collection of seven pieces on subjects ranging from television to tennis, from the Illinois State Fair to the films of David Lynch, from postmodern literary theory to the supposed fun of traveling aboard a Caribbean luxury cruiseliner - David Foster Wallace brings to nonfiction the same curiosity, hilarity, and exhilarating verbal facility that has delighted readers of his fiction.
©1997 David Foster Wallace (P)2012 Hachette Audio
"Wallace's style is highly personal - some might say eccentric - but his writing is always intelligent, witty, and engaging." (Library Journal)
"Mr. Wallace's distinctive and infectious style, an acrobatic cart-wheeling between high intellectual discourse and vernacular insouciance, makes him tremendously entertaining to read, whatever his subject." (The New York Times Book Review)
“these intelligent, funny essays are outstanding.” (Booklist)
I'm sure peoples' tastes on this vary a lot, but... I listened to "Consider the Lobster" a while ago, which is a similar book of essays by DFW, but that book is narrated by DFW. This book is narrated by Paul Garcia. The reading style is vastly different between the two books. DFW's reading style is pretty restrained, like a lot of authors. By comparison - Paul Garcia brings a lot of expression to the reading - his reading of the book sounds sort of like a dramatic monologue, at least compared to the comparatively straightforward approach taken by the author, which sounds like, well, like someone reading from a book. I prefer DFW's reading immensely. I find Paul Garcia's reading here really distracting, and it interferes a lot with my enjoyment of the book. Again - I'm sure this is a matter of taste, and some people will prefer it. But if you are the sort of person who prefers a more affectless reading style, this may bug you as it bugs me.
Addicted to audiobooks & podcasts. 5 Stars=I Loved It, 4 Stars=Enjoyed it Thoroughly, 3=Kinda Good, 2=Bad/Boring, 1=Complete Waste of Credit
David Foster Wallace is a genius and an excellent writer - I have respect for his talent, his articulate mastery of the English language and his ability to paint a picture. That said, this book was just way too much of him at once. I can see how his articles would be big hits on an individual basis but as a collection they just fall flat and I had a hard time soldiering through each anecdote and exhausting train of thought trying to get to the next subject. I was amused at times - just nothing here to LOL about (at least the 3/4 that I listened to before setting it aside). Those of you who long for seriously intelligent commentary and sophistication will probably love this - it's got class - maybe just too much for my lowbrow sense of humor and common tastes.
I had read this book but wanted to listen to it as well. The writing is still wonderful, but clearly the narrator doesn't understand the material. He uses sarcasm when the author is not being sarcastic, makes huge reading mistakes (he calls Louise Erdrich "Louis," for example), and changes meanings by emphasizing parts of sentences that don't make sense.
Fortunately, the writing makes the awful reader less damaging.
The essay genre is well suited for audio format, where thoughts can dance without wandering too far, and there's no strong need to write down anything for reference later, apart from well turned phrases we might want to look back on for inspiration.
David Foster Wallace was a master of the essay form.
I don't know whom I would have chosen over Paul Garcia, but it was clear from the reading the way things ought to have been read, but weren't. I recall a chiasmus or two read in a way that seemed oblivious to the relation of the two sentences, and it hurt to hear.
I could listen to each entry in one go, but it's refreshing enough and light enough, yet coherent enough to only hear as much as fits in a walk, jog or commute, to be picked up later. Again, kudos to the author.
“A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies…The man who never reads lives only one.” (George R. R. Martin)
I would. Maybe in a few years. I would listen to some of the articles I liked better than others but they were dense enough and entertaining that they could require multiple listening if you liked them the first time around.
I would have to say the combination of his razor sharp observations combined with his critical sense of self awareness. Also, the variety of the articles.
That doesn't really apply here. There are a few characters throughout but no stand-out favorites.
Hard to say. There's a lot of information here as each piece is quite long.
An overall strong collection of David Foster Wallace's articles from the early to mid 90s, including a great piece on David Lynch’s set of ‘Lost Highway’, a Canadian tennis tourney, the Illinois State Fair, and aboard a luxury cruise ship. Wallace’s style of razor sharp, surgical precision, that can oft times come off as harsh, combined with his critical sense of self awareness is on full display here. Paul Garcia does a great job of capturing DFW's voice and spirit.
This is a excellent book of essays, narrated beautifully, bringing out all of David Foster Wallace's remarkable humor and irony. I am looking forward to more books narrated by Paul Garcia.
I waited a little too long to write this review, but here we go: I'm from Indiana and grew up playing basketball, and I enjoyed Wallace describing his years travelling the Midwest and the dodgy style of gritty tennis he played. He relished the heat, the bugs, and the surprise gusts of wind while others complained of their foul luck. Memorable pieces on the IL state fair and a trip on a luxury cruise liner. Listened to this as I read Michael Martone's The Flatness and Other Landscapes. A good pair.
I enjoyed the state-fair piece and the opening tennis essay the most.
Laugh. A lot.
Yes. I would like to experience a few of the essay's topics then listen to these essays again.
The author's attention to details. He has a way of writing a mundane occurrence in a way that makes you feel like you too should be getting more out of how you view life.
I really appreciated a theme mentioned in at two of the essays of how millions of people are being sold the concept of individualism.
Yes, entertainingly spot on. The reason we read the funny, the urbane, the caustic..because part shock value part awe in well scripted form.
A David Sedaris experience that's both smart, dark.
Solid. Easy to enjoy.
My midwestern wonky upbringing means excellent story fodder for your listening pleasure
Love the analog paper version as much as the audible
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.