Yes, the thing that really I really picked up on was the main character was so full of human flaws. He makes human mistakes and lets emotion get in the way but always pulls through, not for some super human feat or well time miraculous coincidence. He just perseveres by just chugging along and doing more right than wrong.
The climatic gun fight, and the empty bottle of captain morgan.
Gus of course... unlike some other zombie apocalypse stories. Gus is a true everyman. a bald overweight tradsman, a blue collar guy. survives the first 2 years of the rise of the dead by simple and common sense means, and lives long enough to learn the skills that a lot of zombie book have the main character magically learn in the first few chapters or circumvents that by making the main character some DELTA, Ranger ninja that was on seal team 6... All of his back story is told in past tense, the book begins two years after the rise of the undead and Gus starts out as a capable person in the story, so you need not worry about long drawn out chapters of him transitioning from a fat painter to a cunning survivor.
Its not a "moving" book per say... but you do feel his heart break at the end by the betrayal he faced by someone her really cared about.
Good book, doesn't commit the cardinal sin of taking its self to serious. I have already ordered the sequel and have high hopes for it.
no, I followed founders through the fist two books. the first one was so bad it was amusing kinda like a B horror movie, but after reading the second one I am starting to see that the author takes himself way to serious and has taken platitudes and cliches added a dash of Fobbit war stories and calls it a novel. I love TEOTWAWKI books, they can be a good adventure and a lot of fun, as I said earlier this guy is way to serious and is cramming his ideas (most of which are someone else good ideas, mixed in with some really bad ones that I assume he must of made up working in the TOC during his much touted military experience overseas.)
A. American has a pretty entertaining series out 'the survivalist series." way more about storytelling than a would be survival guide disguised as a story.
This book wasn't any of dick hills fault... he just read it and tried as hard as he could to give the story some legs to keep it moving.
Not a lot. Like I said the first book had that " so corny its kinda good factor" this one was just too over the top to even have that going for it.
The first book "the patriots" in one of its first action scenes had our heroes ambushing a pair of leftist collage kids that had a wagon of human body parts in it and copies of socialist books, just in case you didn't know that they were #1 cannibals and #2 commies. If you buy this book get ready for more of the same, except they really ring the bell for " anyone in government is only there to kill you and rob you." Oh, and Mexican gangs are going to raid north and kill everything in their path. I would say "strap in, this is going to get rough." But this book never gains enough speed to warrant and safety precautions.
It was a bit far fetched, the action was repetitive and predictable to a point but still entertains. The humble hero that wins every encounter because of some convenient dumb luck got old after several chapters, I have followed the ZF series and understand that the main character is not meant to be taken overly seriously, but its almost like the author is trying to make him to be a fool on the one hand and a superhero on the other... It was pulled off relatively well in the ZF series but the Mike Talbot was more of a sarcastic irreverent character where as in this series he wins his battles in almost a slapstick three stooges way... It was a fun read overall and I'll wait for the next two books to have my hair blown back but, even if I am not counting the days till the next release like I was with ZF I will make sure to get around to the next two books in the series.
of course, he has a very good talent for writing and I see why he uses the same character in so many books, Mike Talbot is an everyman that he brings to life very well and the author writes a good story without going overboard on interpersonal side stories that can bog down an adventure story.
He is my second favorite narrator and can really bring out a main character.
yes upon finishing this book I raised my right hand and enlisted in the earth defense marine corp
not his best work but there are 2 more books to go... Not a bad read either just haven't had the same warm fuzzy as with some of his other books.
This series so far has done a great job by not "jumping the shark" they keep the focus on the main characters and the daily struggle to survive. They keep it interesting without putting so much of the filler that I've noticed a lot of the novels today are doing. Surviving the dead is what I would consider a great example of a survivor horror story. The zombies are there in ample but they don't saturate the plot, which many books tend to do. If you're a fan of undead apocalypse style stories I highly recommend these books, they are well written and the author has certainly done his technical research.... Enjoy.
I'd compare this with the first book by the late Z.A Recht.
He was a good narrator, and doesn't overdo it I like it.
it's too long of a book to listen to all at once but its certainly interesting enough that I didn't just put it in when I wanted some white noise while I did something else. You do want to pay attention and enjoy the story.
No. If you want a good book on the subject read Penn jillette's God No.
No, just her writings
She is spinning her politics into a religious manifesto where if you don't agree with her your wrong. She and many others (bill maher comes to mind) are trying to turn atheism from an unaffiliated lack of faith, into a collective that have the same doctrine and sheep their way through life. the very thing that turned me away from any faith, which is an us vs them outlook on life, is the object of this book.
She is condescending to the reader throughout much of the book, talking down to you because you are not nearly as enlightened as she is, and just like the forces she is writing against, she lets you know, if you don't share her ideas you are not only wrong, but stupid. She is also condescending by saying things like " I don't hate people that think differently than be, BUT...." and then uses a vast vocabulary to tell you she hates people that don't share her doctrine.
And keep in mind I am a free thinker and agree with her statements about how atheists should be taken seriously, and 2000 year old sheep herder's campfire stories should not dictate our national policies. But I don't think that someone with a different opinion is somehow a lesser person or inferior.
Its the same BS the the religious right has been feeding us for centuries just wrapped up with an angry leftist vibe, repackaged think like us and sold back to you.
I would remove the author as the narrator. The woman was unable to hide her contempt for others in her voice. She would say something that she thought was bullet proof or a huge insult on "the other side" and then make a small smug laugh and she did it throughout the whole book.
I have a saying. "Try not to argue with someone that shares the same opinion with you." Man, this book really makes that hard.
Report Inappropriate Content