The book centers around the personal recollections of Elyse and Paula, twins separated at birth who met and forged a bond in their 30s.
Having not been a twin separated at birth (as far as I know! Ha!) I can’t imagine what kind of impact such a discovery would have on me – but I didn’t care much for the ladies. I found them so troubled and angst-ridden that it did not elicit any sympathy in me. I just wanted to shake them and tell them to stop whining, cut the drama, quit over-analysing everything and move on with your life!
I was far more interested in the science of twins and by the various case studies on other separated and reunited twins. I think I would have preferred that kind of book instead, as opposed to a memoir format.
Their investigation into the Louise Wise adoption agency and Peter Neubauer’s secret twin study did hold my interest however, and I am curious to know more about the study’s findings and conclusion.
I hope I remember this book in 2066 at the ripe old age of 93 when the records of the study are unsealed.
I first read this book in 2011 and only gave it 2 stars. I think that’s proof that you have to be in the right mood for a book because this time I would easily give it 4 stars if not 4 ½.
It’s all so interesting!! Not just the life of Henrietta, but the history of the Hanoverian Court, how King George I and II came to the throne, their acrimonious relationship, life in London in the early 1700s, the lifestyle of George and Caroline when they were still Prince and Princess of Wales… all of it!
It’s a very well written book; not dry or text-booky at all. I really feel like I learned something… I’m glad I decided to pick it up again.
I always enjoy reading Royal Biographies and the story of Charlotte and Leopold is yet another engaging chapter in a long long long line of interesting stories.
The more I read, the more the links come together and I can better understand how all the players interconnect. I knew Leopold was Queen Victoria's uncle, but I was never sure just how she was related to Charlotte. I knew Charlotte was a popular Princess, but I never knew why.
I first read this book back in 2012, yet I feel like I got more out of it this time. Now, I plan to reread "Henrietta Howard: King's Mistress, Queen's Servant" by Tracy Borman in the same hope of feeling like I learned something new.
This book was hard to enjoy because the main character is so unlikable! “Oh woe is me, I’m such a bad person, I deserve all the bad things that come to me... and I look to put myself in bad situations...” I don’t find any of that interesting – I find it tedious and self indulgent.
Also, nothing really happened in this story outside of the main character’s introspections... it made me wonder if the point of it all was just to be shocking??
What I did like about the book, and why I read it in the first place is because it takes place in Switzerland. That was a lot of fun! I have family in Switzerland, I speak and understand Schweizerdeutsch (Schwyzerdütsch) and have been to Switzerland many times so I got all the cultural references. I know where the town she lives in is, and was easily able to picture it all.
The narration was good, except for the doctor who’s accent was not Swiss but German. I would have been extra impressed had the narrator been able to do a Swiss accent! But it’s not easy – it’s just like French when people try to do a Quebecois accent and just sound Parisian.
If you like all the Swiss references in this book and want to learn more, I recommend Swiss Watching by Decon Lewis.
Yet again, another thought provoking book by Robert J Sawyer… but I expected no less!
The book was written in 1995 and was set about 20 years in the future - which means right about now. This was comical to read because we now know if his future predictions about our culture have come to pass.
He missed the mark on a few things like: Curbside Newspaper Printers, we don’t have VCRs anymore (although his VCR had all the same capabilities and programming parameters that our PVRs have), Donahue and Leno are no longer on air, and poor Peter Jennings passed away.
He got things right like: Queen Elizabeth II is still alive and well, that there would be a Pope Benedict XVI (impressive!) and electronic readers (did we envision reading tablets in the 90s? It’s so long ago I can’t remember.
Of course he did not predict the Iphone but he did conjure up video-phones.
Aside from the fun of picking those details apart, the story itself was a typical Sawyer-mind-bend. I love his books, they never ever disappoint!
I loved the language, the writing, the characters, the narration... but the stories left me a little flat.
I am mining my bookshelves looking for stories I don’t remember so I can get some “free reads”. When I started this one again, I began wondering if I had actually read it before since I truly remembered nothing! As the story progressed, some bits and pieces came back to me, but I didn’t quite remember the ending so it didn’t feel pointless to keep going.
I gave it 2 stars back then but this time I’d rated it 3. I thought the mystery was interesting, and I enjoyed reading about the darker side of life in 1830s Boston. I feel like I learned a little something about the history of medicine and the grizzly world of resurrectionists.
My only complaint is a reoccurring one – the romances. Both the one in the present day and the one in the 1830. They are all so easy and instant! Woman sees man, woman thinks “Ohhh what is this feeling that’s come over me?”, woman falls for man. You’re just supposed to take her word for it that she’s suddenly attracted after 2 conversations? Please.
I read this book the first time in 2011 but since I remember nothing about it, it felt like a new story.
I only gave it 2 stars back then, but I think it deserves a solid 3 if not 4; I was along for the ride from the very first word! I thought it was a very suspenseful and interesting thriller.
On the negative side, the story felt a little dated with references to dial-up modems and beepers and research in libraries on microfiche, and a particularly strange scenario when a woman changes her mind about boarding a transatlantic flight and just finds an exit to leave the airport... but it was written in 2001 so you have to give it a little leeway.
This was an abridged version and while I liked that it was short and to the point with no extra fluff, I think some crucial fluff was left out because information seemed to come out of nowhere: the existence of a safety deposit box and the link to the name of a witness to a crash for example; I felt lost a times.
I don’t know if the books are getting better, or if it’s because by now at Book 14 I know exactly what to expect - therefore get exactly what I want – therefore am never disappointed.
I loved this installment, and I’m so glad Daniel is loosening up on the boorish male attitude towards Molly’s investigations. I hope this is a sign of things to come, I like the idea that they will be a crime-solving duo!!
I’m so looking forward to Book 15.
I’m currently combing through my “old” bookshelves looking for books to reread that I have forgotten all about in an effort to save a few bucks.
I read this one in 2007; I don’t know why I only gave it 1 star, I would say it deserves at least 3 and I love Geroge Guidall as the narrator so he gets a minimum of 4 stars by default! I must have been in a bad mood.
I liked the way the investigation unfolded, I found the plot was intriguing and it kept me guessing to the end… In an oversimplified nutshell: an investigation into a missing person in the aftermath of a plane crash uncovers a cold case from the 70s.
My only criticism is that there was a TON of tedious exposition; I think the plot was explained and re-explained and re-re-explained over a dozen times. “Let me see if I understand” “So what you’re saying is” “Here’s what we’ve determined so far”… Normally I would appreciate this kind of recapping because my mind wanders a lot, but I really didn’t need THIS MUCH; it was so blatant that it became funny!
This is book 16 in a series that is now up to 22 installments. I liked the characters enough to try the series from the start, however this book felt a little dated so we’ll see if I persevere or just continue on as of book 17. I like the idea of a good go-to series and I hope this is one of them.
I read this book back in 2006 (9 years ago) but since I didn’t remember anything about it, it was like a free book! I rated it 2 stars back then, but this time I would give it 3.
Part legal drama & part CSI thriller, it was suspenseful and intriguing – not really a whodunit, more like a howwillhegetcaught.
This is Book 4 in a series and I am curious about other books, I went back to the start and added book 1 (Wild Justice) to my wishlist… I’m hoping it will be a good legal thriller. We’ll see!
Report Inappropriate Content