I was engrossed with this story and felt empathy for all the characters. There were periods when I felt the author endulged in being too, 'preachy.' But, overall, it was an interesting tale. Nevertheless, no amount of explaination could justify such a ridiculous ending. I would not trust this author again.
For those of you who suffer from insomnia...this is the novel for you. It will put you to sleep in no time. I suffered through the fisrt half of the story, where the author informed the listerner of all the gory details of catching, cleaning fish and deaing with, 'slime. Now and then, he inserted the actual storyline of the mysterious death of a female employee aboard the ship. Nevertheless, I stuck with the reading for as long as I could and just gave up. In my opinion, this was a waste of my time.
What a disapointment. I thouroughly enjoyed the first book. But, this story dragged on and on only occasionally, bringing life to the story. And, those instances were only when they featured the horrible mistreatment by the 'profesdsionals' who should have behaved in professional ways. Everyone was to blame for ruining this young lady's life for so many years. Nevertheless, she was triumphant in not giving up. But, the story moved on to spies and politics and moved too much away from the story. I was bored, but I did not give up on it. Dont expect this book to be anything like the first.
Having read most of Mr. Patterson's novels, I I found that Invisible was too similar. Haflway through the story, I had guessed, the 'surprise ending.' Several places in the reading confirmed this. If you like a good mystery, this is not one of them. For those folks who like gruesome details of pain and torture; then this is the book for you.
Mr. Grisham is one of my favorite authors. However, in my opinion, The Street Lawyer is not one of his best work. The story was dragged out unnecessarily. A few characters could have been eliminated to keep to the point. Example, far too much attention to the failing marriage, hinting of a reconciliation. And, the street woman, strggling with addiction and the loss of her son. (It went, nowhere.) More to the point, should have been the focus on a sucessful lawyer, willing to face losing his career, reputation and disbarment, to fight for justice for people who were either dead or unaware of his existence. Frank Muller's voice sounds very much like Steve Buscemi, (Boardwalk.) He reads well. But, several times during the reading, there were sentences repeated. I found that a little distracting and I question who edited this novel.
Typical Stephen King story emphasizing every aspect of decaying flesh and body fluids. Initially, I loathed the wife/mother who seemed to delight in humiliating and embarrassing her family. And I empathized with the husband and son, who only wanted to remain on the farm and live a simple life. But as the story progressed, I could only feel sadness for the son who was too weak to stand up to his father and follow his conscience.
This story could have been more enjoyable had it not been drawn out so relentlessly. The author kept repeating the same things, throughout; until at some point, it became boring. The strong character in the book is the father. The son, who obviously loves his father, gives the impression of being naieve.He had placed his father on a pedistal and refused to believe that he was a human being and not a god. The author seems to dwell on every aspect of the unspeakable torture scenes to the point of nauseum. Each time the story becomes interesting; it slows down and becomes repetitive. I found the reader's voice to be annoying and overly dramatic in places. This also was distracting. I stuck with this book only because in some instances, it became exciting. But, even the end was dragged on so extensively, that one would get the impression that the author did not want to stop writing. It was far too long, with very few surprises.
I found this to be an almost ulikely story, considering that although this young man is a survivor; too many factors would have gotten in his way for the story to turn out as it did. Nevertheless, it was entertaining and worth listening to.
Clearly, this is a story that can only be enjoyed by a teenager. I found the narrator to be very annoying. I've never met any adult who says, 'did ent', or, 'would ent,'etc.' It was very distracting. I need to understand or even empathise with the main character; but I found nothing with this character. She seemed to be obsessed with herself and extremely, clingy. Even with a possevive mother and a wimp of a father; she kept lamenting about their failure to support her in her dream of becoming a dancer. And, yet, she allowed herself to be financially supported by them as she lived comfortably away from them. She made all the wrong choices in her personal life and was shocked with the outcome.She gave mixed signals to her date when she allowed herself to be fondled and moaned when he kissed her. At a social gathering, she was aware that he was innebriated and out of control. But, she allowed herself to be dangerously compromised and became a victim of rape. Against everyone's advice, she chose not to bring her attacker to justice. Instead, she clung to others to lead her about like the weak-minded, spoiled child she appeared to be. Nowhere did she actually stand up for herself and express her outrage and frustration until it was too late. Was there a better need for this woman to seek psychiatric help? I did not return this book because I wanted to stick with it, wanting to believe that she would eventually find her own power to control her life. She didn't. Instead, she kept whining about her 'pitiful life,' throughout.
First of all, I found the reader to have the most annoying voice. For example; every time she said,' EX..CUUSE ME?' I cringed. It was not her fault that too often, the main character repeated someone's statement as if she needed assurance. Nevertheless, the story in general, was a little unbelievable. Having been a priest for ten years, surely he would have protected himself better than to go flying off to 'rescue' a female he knew little or nothing about and who wasn't even a Catholic. The fact that her husband was a violent and powerful man in the community, would have given any sane person reason to make better choices. I would also question a judicial system that would condem an indvidual to life in prison when the victum's body was never found. Too many odds and ends for my liking. Still, I was determined to listen to the entire novel that had a predictible ending. I would not recommend this one.
How this author had the nerve to spend the first SEVENTEEN chapters, rehashing the entire story from the first book, is a wonder. Any reader would know that the second book is supposed to be a contuation of the first;so why bother with the refresher? The main character, supposedly has become older, wiser and more self-confident. This was not the case. She's still giving the impression that she loves/forgives the old fool that abused her for most of her childhood. And, she continues to fall for weak-minded men, although she professes to have changed for the better. I like the fact that she finally became comfortable with her body. The moral of this story is that telling the truth would have saved everyone a lot of heartache. I also was disappointed with the reader, who is nowhere as good as the first narrator. At one point, she even called, RHODA, RHONDA.
Report Inappropriate Content