I got it because I heard her in interviews and thought she was hilarious. This book is not funny nor interesting. I didn't finish it.
If the book wasn't a slight variation from books one and two.
The main character is a girl that is not impressed by money or fame that meets a rock star who has emotional issues and she turns him around. Just the same as with Lick and Play. Even the voices are the same. The structure is the same with only the details changing.
The voice is the same, with the same intonation as the previous books. Probably wouldn't be a problem if the books were different from each other.
It had some funny moments.
Start over from scratch.
kind of. Yes.
The performance was fine. The pace was too slow, and the main character, or one of them was completely annoying. I quit in the first few chapters when I realized I was wishing it would be over soon.
I wish I could return it.
Having the full story
It is a classic of Hispanic literature and for good reason. Cervantes is the Spanish equivalent of Shakespeare.
female mystery ghosts
Interested, yes; on the edge, no.
Maybe not. Probably big chunks, but one sitting would have turned it bore-some.
I hope the writer follows up with the witchcraft series rather than this one.
No. I gave up mid way. I don't know if it was the main character or the narrator that irritated me.
Maybe. If different narrator.
Xe Sand or the one that read "A world without end"
Not sure, I didn't finish.
I really like the voices of the narrator, but I think reading and listenings can't be compared. Listening you receive the story and the interpretation of the narrator, while reading the interpretation is up to the reader.
The different voices for different characters, especially the male characters. I usually find this a critical marker for a narrator and Xe Sands does a terrific job.
It made me chuckle a couple times.
There were a bit too many male characters to keep track of.
It focuses on certain topics described in the gifts of imperfection and hones on them.
Anastasia retells what she writes in her diary as she writes it. She shows her perspective of the history as she perceives it. Since she knows very little of what is happening outside her house and family life, it has little to nothing to tell about her times.
I guess it tries to imitate the idea of the diary of Anne Frank. But it's boring as hell.
They analyze the psychology and philosophy of every single line. At first I thought it wasn't what I expected but it might be interesting from another point of view. I really don't need an analysis of the friendship types in the show as depicted by Aristotle. But it might tickle your fancy. My fancy was not tickled. My fancy fell asleep.
A little gruesome at the beginning, but the tone of the writer and the respect with which the topic is approached provides a fenomenal overview of how cadavers help improve the lives of the still living. I had no idea there was any use for cadavers other than organ donation. Highly recommend it. Even if you have a weak stomach, the writer helps you get past it.
Report Inappropriate Content