This is a well written novel by an author I am getting to know. I do like his work. This novel, although well written, lacks that something special to really draw me in. It is early yet but I don't believe I will be thinking about it days after finishing. That is the mark of a good book, in my view. My reading interests are in transition. I find character driven fiction more to my liking these days, and this book is that. I didn't go into this book expecting a plot driven story. For me, what this story lacks is compelling characters. They were not as developed as I prefer. The story is short enough that I would recommend it. Any longer and I may have lost interest. I do feel that the ending finished stronger than I was expecting.
The book does provide some perspective to those of us that did not live during the time polio was an incurable, unknown disease. In this day and age, it is so easy to take so much for granted.
The narrator did a very good job. A poor narrator - you notice he/she is there, a good narrator - you don't notice he is there, an excellent narrator - you are glad he is there. I didn't notice him so he must have done a good job. I will have to listen to more by him but he has the potential to be excellent.
If you are new to Phillip Roth, it may be better to start with something else. My first by him was Portnoy's Complaint. It was excellent, I hope it didn't set the bar too high.
This book started strong. Early on I would have given it a 4. King has a way of writing a story that keeps you reading/listening. Midway through my impressions fell to a rating of 3 and by the time it ended my overall impression dropped to a 2. I usually quit a book that is no better than a 2 but King’s writing kept me in this one longer and before I knew it, the end was near. I decided to finish it even though by this time I was not enjoying it. I have read a half dozen King books in my life. Most I could have taken or left. The ones I have read, for the most part, have had poor endings. The exception, and one of my favorite books of all time, is 11/22/63. I mention this so you don’t think I am a complete King hater.
Why this novel suffers.
There was no subtlety to this book. It was not full of info-dumps but it was not delicate in its telling. There was too much retelling of previous information. SD seems to do that, over and over and over again. One of the characters, Holly, is poorly conceived and written. The pairing of the 3 crime solvers seemed to be more Scooby Doo than realistic crime fiction. The story was contrived and predictable.
A good crime/thriller novel requires cleverness. There was none to be found. The entire book hangs on the dumbest of points, the entire business of the car key. I won’t say more for those that choose to read it other than, “Really, that was the best you could do Mr. King?” Very lame.
My criticisms may partly be that a little SK goes a long way. As I read over this review I realize some of my criticism for this book could apply to 11/22/63. For example, the way he retells what he has previously told you. That book was the first by him that I had read in some time. It felt fresh while this one felt like a formula.
Unless you are a diehard SK fan (and if you are you likely have already read this book) I would recommend not reading it. He has better books. My suggestion, 11/22/63 (no surprise there huh?)
Will Paton is a favorite narrator. As I consider his performance on this book I wonder if I have listened to others by him with a female character. I am coming up empty. The reason I mention this, I really didn’t like his performance of the character Holly. I have not noticed on other books he has narrated any objections to his narration. Might be because the ones I have listened to had no significant female characters.
Listening to a book usually makes the experience more enjoyable, better. Not in this case. Unlike some of the other books read by actors (Ethan Hawk, Slaughterhouse Five or Colin Firth, The End of the Affair, both excellent) Kim Basinger does a lousy job. She puts nothing into it. She reads each word as if it is the first time she has read it. I feel that the narrators, the goods ones anyway, have prepared themselves before hand. Likely reading the book at least once through. I got the impression that Ms Basinger was reading it for time.It shouldn't be a surprise that she does so poorly. She really isn't a quality actor to begin with.
I have no idea if the story is any good. I will not finish it. To be fair, this book is not really one I would like. It was a daily deal so I thought why not.
I would have forgone rating the story (rating only the narration) but Audible forces one to set ratings for all catagories before the review can be written.
Narration - less than 1 star
Story or overall, indeterminate
This is my forth Bill Bryson book and it is as good as any of the others I have read. So if you like his books, you are sure to like this one.
If you have never read one of his books, this is as good a place to start as any.
Why read his books? He has a way of making just about anything, interesting. In the case of this book, he has the whole of Australia to entertain us. Easy pickings if you ask me.
If I have any complaint, it is only that the book could have been longer. There is so much more that he could had told us about. Dam his schedule, apparently he couldn't spend as much time in Australia as I would have liked. Ha Ha.
The author narrates his book and does a very good job. His books always have a good dose of humor and this more than the usual. Because he is the author and the narrater, the humor shines. I have rated this book a solid 4 stars but if there were a category for humor it would get 5 stars.
I read this as a kid and loved it. I found it so funny. Now, all these years later I decided to give it a listen. I couldn't finish it. It wasn't funny. The words are the same. The narrater did a decent job. But I wasn't laughing. It was tedious and boring. I find this so odd. I usually like my humor read out loud but for this book maybe the paper version is best.
This book has a lot going for it. It has a unique plot, the main character is someone you really want to root for and it is an education of a way of life very remote for most of us.
I knew the story, I had seen the movie, but even so I couldn't put the book(headphones) down. As usual, the book was much better even though the movie was good as well.
If you enjoyed the movie and want to prolong the experience, give this a listen.
Narration was good.
Many years ago, I watched the 1997 film version of this story and liked it very much. This short audio version allowed me to enjoy it again. All the narrators preformed well.
Something to be gained.
We all have the ability to be so certain about what we know. It is important to see that the other side of the story, if we allow it, may in fact be the truer. I guess that is a lesson to be found with this short story.
A very good story. It is easy to recommend this book. It is classified as science fiction but really that isn't a fair way to group it. It is a book to stimulate the grey matter that asks you to suspended one small aspect of reality. That is, the idea that science has come up with a way to help those with intellectual disability. Not much to suspend there, it does seem like something science could achieve.
This is a book that pushes one to think. Not in a hard way, it isn't a difficult read/listen but there are ideas found within that cause one to adjust their perspective. That is true in the way you are placed inside the intellectually disabled person but there are also the many ramifications when that person is 'helped'.
For those wondering, this book does not feel dated. For the most part there wasn't technology discussed that would date it. It was written in a way that it feels current.
If you like uniqueness in you reading, this is a book you should read/listen to. For me anyway, it felt fresh. There are other books that come to mind that are similar but unique in their own way. A Clockwork Orange and Solaris are such books. Both opened my eyes to bigger questions.
If you have read and enjoyed The Curious Incident with the Dog in the Night-Time, you will like this book. Both allow you to spend a few days in the moccasins of someone quite different.
Book or audio? The narrator did an excellent job, he doesn't detract from the story.
This was an enjoyable read. Very funny at times. I liked finding where in history our main character would end up next. The narrator was good and his voice was appropriate to the story. You should read this book if you need a break from your usually reading. The story takes very little mental investment. Just sit back and see where it goes. Even though it is an easy story to get into and enjoy, it is entertaining.
With as many reviews as this book has received why write another? I had a few concerns before deciding to purchase this book and want to share what I have learned. I haven’t finished this book yet but for this review it isn’t necessary.
At least one reviewer commented on the narrator yelling the part of Gus. This worried me. If the narrator takes away from the book then I would just as soon read it than listen to it. Lee Horsley read Gus just the way he was written. Gus is written as a loud man. To not use a loud voice would have been a mistake. Now that I am ½ way through the book I have to say that although his voice is elevated, the voice of Gus is not too loud. I wouldn’t want him any other way. All the characters were well done and in accordance with the way the author wrote them. Because of Lee Horsley this is a book that is better when read though the ears rather than the eyes.
Another concern I had after listening to the sample was the pace at which the narrator was reading. With the sample I felt he was sprinting, barely pausing for a breath. I very nearly didn’t buy this book for that reason. I felt exhausted after listening to the sample. Still there were all those glowing reviews. Could they all be wrong? I decided to go for it. I am glad I did. Although the pace without a breath continued beyond the time of the sample the narrator soon realized that if he didn’t slow down he would not make it to the end. In short order he fell into his rhythm.
One concern that has turned out to be real is the audio quality. The sound level does vary and at one point there is an annoying hum. For me this doesn’t amount to much of an aggravation. The story and narration is on a level that it is easy to overlook the audio quality problems. It is unfortunate though; this should have never left the studio with these issues. Even now most of the quality issues could be cleaned up without re-recording.
With a rating of 4.5 stars and approaching 9000 ratings it is hard to go wrong with this audio book. If westerns aren’t normally your genre but occasionally you do enjoy one, which is the case with me, this is a good one to choose. I am enjoying it very much.
No spoilers ahead.
This was a hard novel to review. I read it in my teens when all I read then was Sci-Fi and Fantasy. I loved it then. This was at a time when nuclear war was in the front of our minds and nuclear winter was being learned about. This novel provided wonderful optimism for the human race (kinda, you have to read it to understand what I mean). All these years later I had the chance to get this audiobook as a daily deal. Couldn’t pass it up even though Sci-Fi is rarely a genre I read anymore.
I have read a few other classic sci-fi books in the last few years and I am always judging whether the story feels dated. To this question the answer is: somewhat. Not enough to spoil the story though.
The biggest issue I have with the story now, all these years later and much reading under my belt, the author is more a scientist and less a writer. His prose leaves a bit to be desired. Arthur C Clark was a genius. He first conceptualized artificial communication satellites. It was this very technology that made the following possible. From the book “Soon people won’t be living their lives any more. It will be a full-time job keeping up with the various family serials on TV!” As far as I am concerned, he predicted reality TV as well. He missed on this one though. In regards to religion at the end the 20th century, “You (mankind) had put superstition behind you: Science was the only real religion of mankind.” He had no idea of the power of the religious right I guess.
The plot of this novel is ingenious. One of the better sci-fi plots. Would I recommend it? If you enjoy sci-fi, then most definitely. If you like to sometimes dabble in it, or more specifically classic sci-fi, then yes, it is a must read. I give the story 4 stars, and the prose 3 stars, overall 3 ½ stars.
The narrator. At best his performance was neutral. He didn’t take away from the story but he didn’t add to it either. In some part, that is because of the writing. The writing doesn’t lend itself well to good narration. I pulled my old paper copy out and read part of the story to see how I felt about book form verses audio. I would lean toward book form in this case. I give narration 2 ½ stars.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.