Just more of the same in this series but in this book there is more sex than any plot and even then it ends without saying what happens to the heroine. What's with that? Especially since each book has its own heroine. Maybe I'm just tired of women being portrayed as subservient. Not sure that I will buy any more of this series.
I really don't care for the narrator's male voice it makes all of the men sound like idiots or just plain weird. She's good for the rest of the reading but her men's voices are just plain distracting.
No, I wouldn't buy another book by this author. I should have known better since there was no description of the book but a lot bout the author.
I'm not interested in individuals in the IRA.
He makes clicking sounds when he speaks
Don't know since the narrator irritated me so much I couldn't finish the first chapter
I won't buy any more books from unknown authors which have no plot line.
I haven't laughed so hard since reading Janet Evanovich. What a great sense of humor and she really knows how to communicate the fun.
I like this book and I disagree with many of the reviews that criticized the book for the plot being unbelievable, and for the book's ending. Of course the book is unbelievable. The whole premise of the trilogy is dysporia and is created in the authors imagination. While I'm not pleased with the ending, at least it wasn't unbelievably sweet like so many reviewers would have liked it to be. Life does have disappointments. And the comment about the goverment's reaction to giving up on a project is 'unbelievable' was untrue because who knows what the state of the US government would be after a major revolution. It isn't any less believable than the experiment itself.
Stories about men romance doesn't interest me. I have no problem with anyone who can find love but I can't relate with the characters
Wow! I thought that this was going to be another frivolous sci-fi fantasy but its just the opposite. Say hello to the flip side of Atlas Shrugged. This book is about the public wrenching the power back from the amoral, power hungry few. It also describes what happens when you rely on the government to solve problems instead of personally getting involved. It is very provocative in addition to being a great read.
I'd forgotten how witty Amanda Quick (Jayne Krentz) was in her earlier works. I thoroughly enjoyed this romp through regency England and may revisit more of her 1990's books.
Good, clean fun. The conflicts created by the lack of money and royal protocol create a lot of interest especially for this American. There is just enough actual historical circumstances and characters to make the plot seem believable and the author has a great sense of humor. Very enjoyable.
The experience of this book would be improved if the male narration was improved. The-female narrator was between a 3and 4 but there is no place to rate the narrators separately. The plot and writing weren't that great either. I won't be buying any more books by this author or the male narrator.
The plot is riviting, writing is wonderful, but what I especially like is the sense of fun that weaves throughout the story and there are quite a few belly laughs in this book. I listen with earphones and my husband hates it when I burst out laughing which makes it all the more fun because he has to listen to the book himself later.
The story is fun and entertaining but was ruined by the narrator. There were scenes that would have been humorous had the narrator done a better job. Breaths were taken too often at inappropriate times, the tone was amateurish and the characters were not developed. The overall rating was mediocre because of poor narration.
Report Inappropriate Content