I recommed the written work "The Common People of Ancient Rome by Frank Frost Abbot" Scribner 1911. Its been on my Kindle for years and I think it was free. Not certain how I came up with it. I still reference Edicts of Diocletion wage and price controls.
I will give it one more try but this presentor is like fingernails on slate, both in sound and in intellectual breadth.
Harsh. Monotonous. Humourless. Obsessed with class.
One more source to peruse but thin gruel. And gruel it is. Even amateur Dan Carlin is WAY better.
I was really looking forward to this. What a bust.
Someone who knew more about the shroud then I do.
For comedy effect only.
Not all that bad so no comment
Rewrite the entire C-14 presentation.
I am convinced the shroud is first century and is forensically exactly as biblically described. Further, pollen and microscopic mineral annalysis shows Springtime in Jerusalem.
I also suspect, as does the aurhor, it is the exact same article well documented as the Mandylion of Constantinople and was plundered during the sack of that city by disgruntled Tenplars on failed crusade.
If you are orherwise well versed in this matter there is good reason to subject yourself to this weird presentation. Some good stuff on the Templar persecution trials and other tid bits. But know the C-14 was a royal botch job right up their with Piltdown Man. This woman is clueless on the issue.
Nothing at all. It is flat out tripe.
Yes. Simply to find out if she is consistently this obtuse.
Very Very Very few.
Guns of August v A World Undone
I recommend you listen to both of these in the order I present them to fully appreciate the contrast. My first listen was A World Undone and though I am not a military afficianato it was so compelling I found myself pouring through battlefield maps. And even ordered another audio book "The Sultans" which I give two thumbs up.
Undone is so easy, so simple, so comprehensive and concise on the entire war that I was appalled with my listen to Guns of August. Putting asside guns covers only the first six weeks of the War, it rises to little more then a thrilling costume drama. And in my opinion a dime store costume drama at that.
Her discussion of mobilization is an actual travesty and more then likely has adversely effected entire generations of readers.
The absolutely clear linearity of it all and the rather tenuous chance the void left by Roman withdrawal from Britain would by chance be filed by egalitarian customs that became extinct on the continent.
And so many times a close run thing even to our modern times.
Survival of common law traditions after the Norman Conquest.
The general discussion on how the anglosphere is what it is in large extent because we are all of us much like islands.
The misfortunes immediately following 1066
This book gets added to my permanent elite library.
Anyone curious of history will discover what an alternative universe in this world can really mean.
To much to choose from.
Took awhile getting used to but turned out precisely correct.
I am history buff but was not prepared for this important missing gigantic chasm that needed redress.
This presents the consequences and development of an historic civilization as planted by Ghengis Kahn`s lineage. A real life lesson on first causes. This story does not reach into that previous so check out Dan Carlon`s wrath of the Kahn`s.
The early chapters.
Yes. This book confirms my own observations general world conditions are much better then past. Three cautions. 1) the book progresses into very much detail that some of us will not require; 2) The author stratified civilisations by descending order A) Europe; B) Blue States; C) Red States; D) Islamic States. I am in one just above a Caliphate.
Finally, the author seems a scientist, a socialist, and an atheist. What could possibly go wrong.
PS - Atheism seems a bit Luddite in the era of quantum mechanics and the double slit experiment which has, apparently been proven retroactive in time. Consciousness, as an independent variable… religious fundamentalist atheists who might deny unknown science?
Never heard of such a thing.
Requires some attention because the writing is cleverly crafted in a bit antique manner. But a real hoot.
It all sounds so recently familiar. Hundreds of years later.
Good Brit presentation of compound sentences. So listen up!
Two or three.
I have re-played a number of chapters already. Lots of very good info, competently presented.
Very broad historical presentation.
One of the better religious presentations.
I do not read much fiction but am not quite convinced King writes fiction.
Endless single sentence delights.
Can't actually recall a single one of them, at the moment.
Dinner? Are you mad?
I promise to take better care of my firearms.
The man reviewed cuneiform then said some of our own sylabic alphabet includes characters descended from it. Our alphabet is not sylabic and some letters decend from hyroglyphics, not cuneiform. I double checked.
I have read entire books on the development of writing and would love to be corrected if I am mistaken.
Strange narrative "You will see nothing but sun baked mud" in Mesapotamia as far as the eye can see. Then it will rain and wash away the houses and crops (which you must have missed the first time).
Not that bad
No reason not to try it out. Not everyone knows about cuneiform etc and will not notice. I just lost confidence.
Have not read the print version
Yes. Could not manage it all.
This includes the only complete and understandable description on how elements are made and thats just for starters. I am versed in much of this stuff but recommed the book to all comers.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.