There seems to be a general misconception that this book is somehow attacking the right wing political agenda. I can tell you as a republican/libertarian, that nothing could be further from the truth. This book praises small government and self determination which are supposed to be two of the main goals of the right. Nor does Steele attack southern culture, if anything I believe that naming the man who rebels against the tyranny of the unjust government portrayed here in after Robert E. Lee is, if anything, high praise. Just because he calls the oppressive single party of the government of the former united states the "Liberty Party" does not mean he is attacking the right. Steele seeks to demonstrate that any government which embraces a single ideology and openly condemns all others will tend towards repression and the abuse of power. I think one of the strongest arguments for this intent comes from later in the book where the characters encounter a single ideology communist government (no better than the liberty party's republic), but I don't want to spoil it for you.
I think the story is really good, some of the writing is a little unsophisticated for my tastes (but I'm spoiled by writers like Heinlein, Asimov, Herbert, Simmons, Clark etc), mainly it seems toned down on vocabulary to reach a broader audience. The book is well read, and as I say the story is very compelling. I'd say this is a solid 4 star audio book.
Yes, usually this would be a no, but Peter Kenny's performance is outstanding.
Those readers who can empathize with the main character seem of the opinion that this book is as much an exploration of the reader's "self" as it is about the Harry August. Those who cannot relate to the Harry, seem to dissociate him from normal human behavior, classify him as so outside the norm as to be even sociopathic. However, ultimately this an exploration of eternal recurrence (ground hogs day, but under your control), without an impossible striving for the perfection. Just a striving for purpose. Looking for a purpose is something we all do, to one degree or another, and that makes the character eminently relatable. However, his mode is so foreign as to also make him also alien. The author does a compelling job of portraying a character that is, at once, convincing in his role while still being wholly strange, since he is, in the end, immortal and we are not.
It was an interesting story, but sort of morose. I found it mostly depressing and the actions of many of the characters unbelievable. Still, it had certain appeal in that it explored thoroughly the extremes to which the diverging attitudes of humanity might lead us. And it is an excellent warning against isolationism.
I feel like all these books end abruptly. I guess that is what you get when you take a huge book and break it into 4 parts. I long for the ways of french romanticist literature when a 1400 page book like the Count of Monty Cristo got published commonly. Anyway. It is good. Though I noticed that whoever put the cover art together spelled Conciliator wrong (or the people who listed it on audible did, either way someone screwed up).
I would give Hyperion 4.5 stars, but I feel obligated to give 5 if just to offset these science fiction appreciation challenged fools. Sure, Hyperion ends abruptly. What publisher do you know that lets you publish a 1200 page novel? This is one of the best science fiction books of all time, I know, I've made a side career of reading Scifi. I would say the list goes something like this: Dune, Enders Game, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, Hyperion, the Mote in God's Eye, the Fall of Hyperion. Read it, listen to it, but don't stop with it, finish up with the Fall of Hyperion as well. The books are really fantastic (not a huge fan of Endymion and Rise of Endymion but they tie up the series nicely). Seriously, if there is one writer today whose work compares to that of the "Golden Age" writers, it is Dan Simmons. This book is mostly character development, but it is great character development.
Report Inappropriate Content