The book was great. While, yes, James Marsters is the defacto voice of Harry Dresden, John Glover does a great job of filling in and even has a similar voice to Marsters, so quit your belly aching. Anybody who is hesitant or on the fence about it, don't be.
It was Ok. I speak of the entire story as whole, both books up to this point.
The whole 'hunting for clues' part of the book was fun, reminded me of Jack McDevitt
Can't pin one down.
While an okay read the books up to this point are not what we've come to expect from Reynolds and were a bit on the dull side when compared to his other work.. I knew that getting into them, based on previous reviews.
The entire series is for people who like long and boring descriptions of military engagements and who like to read manuals on weapons systems.
No, but certainly turned me off this one.
Yes, had no problem with narration.
I read the first 3 books in this series but I don't think I'll bother with any more. I liked Webber's Safehold series (But he tends to be long winded there too) but this series is very dull. Each book starts with a contrived 'situation'...for example this one "Here...I got a good idea! Lets take one of our major sources of trade, income AND a perfect route for an invasion and minimally defend it with screw ups!" Each book, thus far, is a long drawn out build up to a capital ship engagement. I think Webber political views are showing in this series too.
The characters are not compelling and Honor herself seems cartoonish. And holy Moley Mr. Webber - We really don't need to hear about Honor's soprano voice or her 'chocolate brown eyes' after the first time!! Could play a drinking game for each time he mentions them.
Overall not impressed. If you like long detailed descriptions of space battles then this might be for you....if you like a good story and plot you should probably move on.
I see all these complaints about the Narrator. While the switch in Narrators (again) is highly annoying Keating is not nearly so bad and people keep saying. It's a difference in British vs. American pronunciation. For example he pronounces Sharleyan as Shar-Lee-anne instead of Shar-lee-in etc.. I have no difficulty understanding what he says and in fact I think he would have been a fine Narrator for the entire series. The only thing I don't like about it is everybody typically sounds like they're ready for a nap.
All of it? I got up to book 4 but just could not finish it. It's hard to put a finger on it but I think it boils down to unbelievable characters, villains, and this alien nano-tech that might as well be magic. The whole story feels hollow and like a badly written episode of Star Trek. I've probably just been spoiled by likes of Peter F. Hamilton and Alastair Reynolds as they set the bar way up there and Larson isn't jumping nearly high enough. Popcorn sci-fi.
I loved this series back in the 80s when I was a teenager, but like so much Sci Fi from then it does not hold up well against the works of modern writers like Peter F. Hamilton, Alastair Reynolds, etc.. The world/universe is almost cartoonish and the villains rather laughable and some of the characters actions are inconsistent or unbelievable. I would call this more Science Fantasy than Science Fiction.
I'm actually listening to Exiles at Well of Souls to see if it gets any better...so far it has not.
Deep, deep, and deep!
Best Series EVER.
Minor Spoliers! Cherryh's Foreigner series has a lot similarities to Chanur - Lone human surrounded by strange aliens he only somewhat understands, although in Chanur you never are from the PoV of Tully and are very much so in Bren in the Foreigner series. Also the Lone human and Alien female romance, although it's not much delved into or explored in Chanur between HIlfy and Tully.
Well...she was good...various voices and accents for the characters. Overall she was very good except in ONE glaring aspect that annoyed me every time she did it. The character voices are always delivered in the same way. For example, there's one crew member,Chur, who is badly hurt and during her recovery she's often noted as speaking in a whisper or other pained voice...but Pearlman reads it like they were just standing there with nothing wrong. Other than that she did an excellent job, I especially liked her portrayal of Jik and Goldtooth.
The aborted romance between Tully and HIlfy (In later books in the series)
Hard not to rave about this series. I've read the hardbacks at least 5 times over the years and I am thrilled Audible is going through the backlog of older series like this and putting them up. Like I said in the review title, it's like seeing old friends after being long absent..the kind of story that makes your heart ache when it's all over because you want so badly for the story to continue.
Great book. I'm not quite finished with it, another couple of hours to go, but it's typically great Sanderson with plot twists that have you arching your eyebrows. HOWEVER...the narrator...well..it's not that he's bad. Overall he does a fine job EXCEPT for one of the main characters...it sounds like he's channeling Bill and Ted and I found his voice for this character annoying to the point of distraction. Other than that, excellent listen.
I love the Kovacs novels, great high sci-fi/cyber punk feel but I had to knock a star off for the sex scenes- which are in all of his books it seems. It's not that there is a lot of it or that I'm a prude, far from it, but he goes into way too much unnecessary detail which just makes it seem pornographic and distasteful and out of place given the rest of the book. I don't really see the need to put that detail into the story, it would have been better off glazed over instead of blow by blow graphic descriptions.
Written 10 years after Ringworld it's better but still showing it's age and I find Niven's use of sex in this novel rather odd, bordering on creepy and nonsensical. Still, a good read if you've nothing else and it's fun going back to books I read when I was a kid.
I read this back in the 80s and loved it then, not so much now but it's still a good book, a classic. Considering it was written in 1970 (And later revised some) it's age shows with references to "Tapes", lack of HUD displays etc. et al. It's especially glaring when 40 years later when compared next to books by Peter F. Hamilton or Alastair Reynolds which I expect will hold up better to the test of time.
Report Inappropriate Content