This is a good addition to the series, providing some good history for several of the characters, most notably Walt Longmire and Henry Standing Bear. The appearance of a dead Vietnamese woman in the county sparks flashbacks for the sheriff, and pieces of the story in Vietnam in the late 60s are interwoven with the current story unfolding in Absaroka County in the late 2000s. It does make me readjust my expected age of Longmire, though - I hadn't quite thought of him in his 60s, but the references do make him at least 60 in this book. Not that it matters, but it doesn't quite match the picture in my mind (where I pictured him in his mid to late 50s). I enjoyed the mix of past and present, and the addition of some historical perspective on the characters.
I wasn't sure about this when I started listening, but I got more used to the interpretation of the novelization format, the more I got to like it. Unlike a play, this format leaves little interpretation to one's imagination and, in fact, gives the characters ideas and actions that never appeared in the play. That's not necessarily bad, just different, and I think those who are Shakespeare-philes might have a problem with the new interpretation of Polonius or Ophelia.
The novel also expands on the action and expands many of the mentioned events, like the pirate attack and the activities in Fortinbras' camp. Very enjoyable, and well read. It's not "Hamlet", but it's good all the same.
Hint: Be sure to listen to the afterwords, which help explain how the authors used primary sources as part of their work in writing the novel.
You've got to get past the ridiculous set up of a murdered PhD student looking 98% like a Dublin police detective and the police managing to slip the detective into the life of the deceased.......but once you get past that, what remains is an interesting and intriguing book.
Honestly, the character of Cassie didn't make a big impression on me in In The Woods, though I liked that audiobook a lot. So when I saw that there was a second Dublin Murder Squad book in Audible, I was surprised to find it about her and not about Rob, Cassie's partner in that book. Surprised, but not troubled, found I really liked this book and the exploration of how a detective feels and changes when surrounded by various circumstances undercover. That's really what this book is about -- more a psychological thriller of a detective undercover than a mystery about who killed the Trinity student and why.
The narrator did an excellent job, and I found her Irish accent a joy to listen to.
In this case, Poirot takes on the job requested of him in a letter he received months too late - and long after the letter writer is dead.........did she die an accidental death, as has been officially stated, or was it murder? And if it was murder, who was the guilty party? There's a collection of relatives and hired help who all might get a piece of the inheritance, and it's up to Poirot to figure it out. Very nicely done by Christie from a kind of routine set up (as many of her's are). As for the dog......well, the deceased client's dog get a few "words" in the story too.
I thought this book needed a good editor - things dragged on a little too long and the middle dragged too far from the heart of the story i.e. the ongoing relationships between those who can cut through reality to thoughts (Vic, Mags, Charlie). I did like that heart of the story, but Hill's writing suffers too much from excessive and unnecessary scatological and juvenile language (including all the swearing, which is a significant amount). His father had a tendency to lean a little too far that way, but either he has a better editor or enough self control to rein it in (and enough talent in other places to make it tolerable). This is the first book I listened to that was narrated by Kate Mulgrew, and she did a terrific job with all the characters.
I've enjoyed several other (later) books by Martin Cruz Smith and I was looking forward to one of his earlier novels.....sadly, I finished disappointed. There is much less characterization and much more cliched action in this book. It was fine, and average novel about vampire bats and infectious disease on a Reservation, but nothing to write home about. It was interesting, though, to read the about the political issues between the Hopi and the Navajo from the Hopi point of view which paints the Navajo in a bad light.....different from other books I've read where the protagonists (and the novel's setting) are Navajo.
The narrator did a really bad job; I had to run this book at 1.25x speed just to make the narration sound "normal" and not be too slow and ponderous. He is bad with differentiating characters with his voice and some of the characters sounded really unbelievable.
This is a nice, lightweight mystery that is a little dated (written in 1964), but not in any way that detracts from the story or the writing. I had heard about the series of the rabbi sleuth many years ago, and it was nice to actually enjoy it now -- with one of my favourite narrators George Guidall, who did a wonderful job. The protagonist is only rabbi in a small New England town, and the mystery of the murdered woman is tied in with conflicts among the synagogue board members, office politics, and town gossip among the Jewish and non-Jewish residents. That helps it all ring true, with believable characters (for the mid-sixties suburbs).
It's hard to really like a book with such an unsympathetic central (and title) character. While many reviews say that the character was driven insane by his discovery of invisibility, I'm not so sure......I thought it seemed like he was always a selfish, rude megalomaniac and was only given more ability to express that as an invisible man. It's hard to say, of course.
What surprised me was how much of the story is taken up with what is essentially slapstick action of people chasing, and being chased by, the invisible man. It's kind of ridiculous and unnecessary, in my opinion, and detracts from any suspense or thriller-type of atmosphere that could have been built. The underlying sci-fi of how a physicist discovered the secret of invisibility and the social message of the difficulties of being invisible are kind of lost under the action and reaction of the end effect (an invisible man who can enter or leave anywhere undetected, and so can attack people at whim).
I've enjoyed so many other HG Wells books, that it was a real disappointment to me to find this book really only average, in my opinion. And the narration was really only fair, with unnatural accents really distracting from the flow of the story.
Disclaimer......I did not read the first installment of the book, but I know the character and have seen some of the TV series. This book attracted me more because it is more about the people and her experiences as a nurse than as a midwife, and I was hoping that it would be more in-depth about the characters she met than about her culture shock......and it was (so I've been told from those who've read both).
I loved the stories told about a few of the people she'd met while living and working there, going in depth into their past as well as their present to build some emotional depth and understanding. It's about the shadows of war as much as the workhouse (and I found that man's the most compelling story), but the misnomer of the book's subtitle doesn't take away any of the emotional effect. The narrator also does a good job with the characterization and emotion in the authors voice. I found her voice here really pleasant to listen to.
I like post-apocalyptic stories, and I've read some great ones (Day of the Triffids and Alas, Babylon are standouts), but, alas, this is not one of the great ones. And Audible doesn't have a way to distinguish "writing style" and "story content", so I decided to give a 4 all 'round, but really it's for the sparse and emotional style more than the content itself. The content has unrealistic happenings and holes you could drive a bus through, though I was happy, while reading, to suspend my disbelief - the style and emotion (and narration) was that good.
I loved the incredibly realistic, but repetitive, dialogues with The Boy -- his unhelpful, repeated responses of "OK" and repeated declarations his needs ("But I'm hungry" or "I'm really scared") are just like a small boy would make, and bring a realistic touch to an unbelievable landscape. The landscape is unbelievable - stark, cold, gray, empty - and the entire book is shadowed with those emotions. The Boy is both the Man's conscience and hope in an unforgiving world of those few who are desperate to survive, and the Man is the Boy's father -- which means he is the Boy's everything when there are no other people for days and months on end.
The resolution is abrupt and undeveloped, popping up without warning and not any better because it is a positive ending on a depressing story. Good narration, good emotions, good dialogue, good narration, but only fair in terms of actual plot and storyline.
Walter Mitty has become a well-known character of pop culture, and it was nice to hear the original story that created him. I had previously only known him as a character in the movie (the 1947 adaptation with Danny Kaye) and as the cultural characterization of a dreamer who avoids the dreariness of life by escaping into his fantasies. Now I get to see the original Walter Mitty, which adds an extra level of meaning to the term (and the man).
Although Ben Stiller is well known as an actor, I found his narration didn't add much to the story - acceptable, but not much more. Of course, his narration was intended to be a tie-in to promote his movie, and I didn't bother listening to the last few minutes of the recording that (I presume) was a more direct promotion for the book.
An interesting short story, but I'm glad I didn't pay for it.
Report Inappropriate Content