Wonderful, entertaining, smart, provocative book that is very well directed and perfectly read by two characters. This book lends itself very well to audio because it's essentially two narrators describing the world. I have recommended this book to everyone I know but be forewarned, the "near-future" described is slightly raunchy and not for the grandmothers of the world.
What struck me about this book is that I now know that because I am writing this review, that I am essentially volunteering to help Audible/Amazon in their unquenchable hunt for data. It's a good book and well written but I'm sure some readers may wish that he was more dispassionate/less hysterical about certain topics. If Amazon allowed me to give stars for genre, I would say it was a 3 star polemic that could have been a 5 star expose. I don't doubt that the author is probably right about our feudal Renaissance but he has to convince a lot of people and his diatribes may prove counterproductive. For example, it would have been good to see him interview some dispassionate economists to persuade us of some of his more revolutionary claims. Still a fun and informative read that I would highly recommend.
The narrator is perfect as his voice is soothing and mature but also very dynamic. The many characters come to life through him. The book itself is far better than I thought it would be but I imagine that its beauty and insights would appeal most to readers who themselves have already attained a certain age. It is the story of a man's life and so one must have seen something of life and perhaps already have wed and had children, to fully enjoy this marvelous tale. The descriptions of the land are unforgettable and never once overwrought or tedious as I worried they might be. The writing flows through the places and characters as they develop and as the land transforms from their labor. It is also a book about poverty and wealth, work and ritual, family and love and lust and hatred. war, starvation, shame, bandits, revolution, the country, the city, the disabled, drug addiction, beauty, greed, risk, friendship and loyalty, fear and loathing, honor, guilt, memory, money, loyalty, disloyalty, famine, disease, mobs, theft, rumor, innuendo, scheming, posturing, embarrassment, pride, babies, whores, gender issues.... It's all there but never as overwhelming as a long list might suggest. It is a giant book that taxes the reader very little and will probably remain a classic for a long time.
This book justifies and rewards those readers who have the capacity to read advanced prose. I. Could not have u nderstood this novel without having trained by way of copious prior literary e exploration because McCarthy presumes his readers are at the top of their game. He certainly is; this is an amazing novel not to be missed. The violence is unnerving and disturbing on many levels but it is also beautiful and sublime. Imagine a story as gripping and epic as Lonesome Dove but without a single good hearted character or even a single chuckle of humor. sounds 八点不同哦 itsg re s t
Worth listening to despite how out of date the book is. Also worth checking out Lewis's earlier writing style, which is very good but not as confident as his more current work.
I would have bet that Steinbeck wrote this long before The Grapes of Wrath because it is the lesser novel, but evidently he wrote this much later. It is too sprawling for even his control and stretches rely on narrative exposition rather than dramatic action or nuanced description. Perhaps it should have been longer still! No doubt my world is enriched for having read this and it is still a masterly work of fiction--it's in the top 500 novels ever but not the top 10 like Grapes of Wrath, and some of the characters will endure long into the future. Thematically more ambitious than Grapes of Wrath, the Cain and Abel structure is enlightening but less meaningful and less tangible than the historical forces at play in Grapes, at least for me. No Steinbeck enthusiast should miss this but a newcomer would be advised to start with Grapes. The reader is excellent and helps shape the experience.
This is the only book I've ever encountered in which I could never really keep straight the endless characters but never felt that such confusion impinged on my ability to understand the gist of things. Despite the profusion of characters and backstories, the narrative is terse and economical and the author has an expert grasp on pacing and tone. Moreover, the language of the novel casts knowing darts outward from the ostensible spy story toward enduring themes of love, society, democracy, friendship, and institutions in ways more effective than most "deep books". The reader was the best ever. I have already replayed this novel as background music, which is a first for me.
Greenberg blends gonzo journalism, scientific literacy, and wry critical thinking into an engrossing, enlightening, and provocative work of art. Another reviewer called this book a rant but it is the opposite of a rant; the author never repeats himself but instead constantly reassesses his beliefs according to the evidence at hand, tweaking them to conform to his changing experiences. Instead of a rant, the book is a dialectic, a series of conflicts and resolutions, the backbone to a great story. In addition, Greenberg isn't afraid to explore the idea that treating depression with drugs could be yet another concession that democracy makes in the face of advanced capitalism. Greenberg is not a timid writer. He is also astonishingly smart about how to analyze the facts of his subject not only in the best terms that science promises (not mystifying jargon but razor-sharp logic and metacritical rumination) but also in terms of the (frankly fascinating) history of science. I cannot recommend this book highly enough and I an shocked that The Emperor of All Maladies received so much press whereas it was pure chance that I heard about this book. Yes, The Emperor of All Maladies is a very good book, but Manufacturing Depression takes more risks by drawing narrative steam from the engine of the romantic-self and the democratic society rather than the lachrymal-melodrama of the cancer ward.
Report Inappropriate Content