Yes. The characters were very well defined. Great storytelling. The writing style seemed slow and meandering but in fact every word was there for a reason and proved to be essential in the all around story.
Most interesting? Not sure if it's interesting or just that I really liked how the location was introduced in a literal broad view, the view from a train and as the story unwound, we get more intimate with the physical scenes and characters. Least interesting was how the 3 women had something in common. Even though the great storytelling kept me tuned in to the very end, I did figure it out around the middle which is why I gave the story part of the rating a 3.
The way they intoned the nuances and internal shifts of emotion or intuitions during the characters interacting with each other. They brought each character alive with different inflections and slang. Incredible they were all so great. You don't get that too often when there are several narrators. Usually there's a dud but not here. The one who did Rachel is my favorite though. So complex!
Yes. I don't typically like mysteries but this book is a psychological thriller. There isn't a lot of action, instead it comes from inside the heads of each character. Sound potentially boring but instead it keep me listening and finding reasons to drive so I could keep listening.
Given some of the comparisons to "Gone Girl" I pleasantly surprised that it wasn't similar. I liked gone girl but didn't want to 'read' a similar story, and it wasn't. The only thing the two stories have in common is a missing girl. Entirely different set up, circumstances etc.
Minus the gruesomeness I'd almost compare the inner dialogues and characterizations of to those of Cormac McCarthy's. Not a single heartbreaking action or thought out of place. Lord of Flies only much more harrowing and GRUESOME! The cause of the horror [I won't spoil it] happens to be my Achille's heel since I was 5 after an Army story my father told me - the single most horrific thing I personally could ever imagine to happen to a person, then multiplied by a thousand. In fact, it's a small paranoia of mine. For that reason, I had to skip over large chucks of narrative because Cutter spares no detail with gore, in fact he rolls around in it like a puppy in tall grass. I could not cope. Despite that, I loved this story through and through. To call it a coming of age story sounds trite, but the complex and morphing relationships and group dynamics of the these boys feels so true to reality it's easy to relate. How kids are to each other in small groups vs., large ones. How they are individually vs., together and how not everyone is redeemable.
I listend to it all the way through so it kept me in my seat painting hours which is what I needed to accomplish but the description had me hoping for more of a Southern Gothic flavor with the Ozarks and the dark family history. The ingredients were all there: the characters, the setting, the backstories... but it's not in the writing. I didn't feel any sense of atmosphere or dread. I Wasn't looking for horror but I can't explain without sounding like a pretentious jerk. It just didn't feel as 'dark' as I was hoping for considering the selling points in the description and title.
I kept finding things to do like going for extra long walks or washing the dishes [my husbands chore] so I could keep listening. I purchased it based entirely on the ratings not at all interested in period pieces but I was more than pleasantly surprised.
Never heard such a great narrated performance and given the amount of characters, accents and the time period, it could have gone horribly wrong. Instead it was perfect and so believable.
The story is an A1 murder mystery [I usually hate mysteries] set in a time when supernatural beliefs were the norm. The characters are all so complex and I miss them already. I can't say enough. One the best I've audiobooks I've listened to.
This might be a good book for someone interested in architecture or deeply interested in how the World's Fair came to be.
I was interested in a story about HH Holmes that did not dwell on the gore so I thought this might be a good one to shed some light on the historical perspective and how it came to fit together so - terribly with him and his 'murder castle'. The story is sprinkled with Holmes' story during the World's Fair but so far [I'm struggling more than 1/2 through] it drones on and on and on in painfully minute detail on the ups and downs of how the fair was built, down the very bolts that hold the buildings together. Even if Holmes was not part of the story, anything else to break away from monotony of architectural and details would have provided some balance. Some nice bits of history here and there but I'm afraid it was a yawn for me.
Yes. I don't like listening to audiobooks twice but theses characters were given such realistic motivations and personalities that I'm sure a second listen would reveal a few more details.
To me, the book was about the nuances of what makes a person good and/or evil and the characterizations illustrated those very clearly. Narrator was top notch too. Each character had their own distinct way of speaking and she went from one to the other flawlessly which could have easily gone sideways given all the different vernaculars and intonations.
Jackie [I think that was her name]. I hated this character but from the performance, I got a clear picture of who she was and who she wanted to be but wasn't. This character used a lot of slang and again is one of the characters that could have been over done but Bentnick did it with restraint.
Amber. She's a better woman than I'd have been.
Highly recommended. I had to pace myself and not listen to it in one sitting. I saved it for time when I had to complete a painting which requires something to keep me in my seat.
This is a good, well written and very nicely narrated story. The characters are fleshed out to a medium degree but kept my attention. It does have a "made for tv" feel about it [yes I know it's a book]. The style of writing conveys no sense of horror however. A huge disappointment for a book that invokes Lovecraft lore. Still a good listen if you're driving or going for a long walk. Moves quickly, decent mystery and has lots of action. If I were more into SciFi I'd be less critical of the lack of 'horror' and probably would have given this one more star.
I love when an author reads his own work and I do love King's voice so 5 stars for narration. This story is not one of my favorites of Kings. It may be that I couldn't personally relate to the protagonist - a 40 something widower, though I did feel sympathy for him. What turned me off was that the only female character was - to me - depicted as a damsel in distress. Pretty, blonde, smart and a single mother who lights up rooms and everyone [all men] has a crush on her. Whether it's latent jealousy on my part or not, her character is grossly unrealistic. The scene where she's dancing on a frisbee finally forced me to put it away for a whole week before picking it up again to finish it. Unexpected ending, that was good.
The story focuses on the author's voice rather than on Gacey's deviant psychology. It is fascinating to see the 'why' and 'how' the author would set about doing what he did, putting himself in such a vulnerable position and how it as all accomplished. I did expect there would be more in terms of unearthing Gacey's own background. Instead, there's a LOT of lingering on the sexual and violent nature of the murders and not much to shed light on why Gacey might've been the way he was. I'm no prude but there was so much graphic detail that I skipped through much of that, not out of squeamishness but out of boredom. Again the author's story and his mind set is fascinating to read about.
The narrator has a stilted quality but somehow fit the voice of the author and did like the reading quite a lot.
I'm not one for stories whose characters are mostly cops, FBI agents and detectives but for what it was it was a good one. If I'd based this solely on my particular preferences [I prefer a much darkly rooted mental sensibility a la Deliverance or We Need to Talk about Kevin] I may have given this a 3.5. The southern setting and creepy set up [arachnids, a serial killer and the deep south] is was attracted me to this story as I've been looking for good modern southern gothic. The setting, story and characters were all there but it did not have the deep seated eeriness that I was looking for. However, I did get the creepy crawleys and had a good few nights of bad spider dreams! Gardner weaves a fine story and if you like a good mystery this'll do ya.
Report Inappropriate Content