I was looking for a book with insight; instead i received, a psychological banter, circling and backlighting a very spiritual guide. Are we who live in the early 21st century, so dense to the spiritualization of thought, that we need synthetic thinkers to interpret, psychologically speaking?
My question would actually be, do we need the frosted glass of pseudo-Freudian thought to see the truth of snow, through that glass more clearly? Who is viewed and what is viewing in the book is so confusing and contrary in thought, that for minutes i began to seek a paradox within the attempt to co-join Western and Eastern philosophy.
We are not philosphers or great spiritual thinkers if we succumb to basic psycho-rhetoric, for this rhetoric cannot proscribe or inscribe the beauty of holiness. It rings false and unctious.....stay away from this tome! Choose to read more primary texts and less secondary source materials -- like this one.
Report Inappropriate Content