The time was well spent , but it was very hard to keep up with all the jumps in time and personnel. It would have been better if the author would have dealt with the history chronologically - rather than jumping back and forth from one time and director of Mossad to another - often without any glue to hold the disparate parts together.
Yes. but ony to those who are familiar with intelligence organizations.
HIs narration was good because I thought I was listening to an Israeli telling the story
Yes, to try to capture all the momentus history of which he was a part.
I usually do not like it when the narrator tries to imitate the voices but he nailed Churchill's and it helped in knowing when he was quoting Churchill directly.
yes. But it drove me to distraction the way he (Chafer) or he (Reid) felt he had to define every single direct and indirect object. If HE said he was going to Chartwell for dinner I damn well knew that he was talking about Churchill, not the Archbishop of Canterbury
First were the years of 1940 and 1941, when Churchill and the Europeans were dealing with the Nazi and Axis push through Europe and we did not even seem to notice there was a war going on. The second - When Churchill was dealing with Roosevelt and Stalin - - It was so obvious that Churchill was right and that the world might have been in much better shape if Roosevelt had listened to Churchill rather than winging it with Stalin.
This really give us Americans a good idea of the war years we missed - when things seem so bleak.
The author went off on one knucklehead that did not reveal what he knew about the dangers of a certain chemical - - worth a note but not a chapter. His bent on climate change also seemed like a political rather than scientific rant. EVERYTHING I LEARNED IN THIS BOOK TOLD ME THAT WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN AND HOW CHANGES WILL EFFECT THE EARTH. So just tell me about the science and let me draw my own conclusions.
I really liked the march of history, the reign of the dinosaurs, the very long history of Homo erectus and humans, and how genes and DNA and RNA change the world. I also liked the explanations of scientists, what they did and did not do - and how many broke new ground, while others ruled their age while their theories were later disproved. That - I never got in science class.
I intend to listen to this book again because it is difficult to absorb all of the wisdom he imparts in one sitting even though he is a master of explaining very difficult concepts in simple terms.
Civilization - the West and the Rest
I did not find it moving - I had very little emotional response to it - but I found the explanations of the early cultures and how we got to where we are today from those points in history, very compelling.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.