ONLY AS REFERENCE. GOT THE STORY FIRST TIME.
SOOO MANY. THE INDEPTH RE. LEON RUSSEL, GLEN CAMPBELL, TOMMY TEDESCO, CAROL KAY AND THE OPENING NARRITIVE.
A LITTLE SLOW BUT NOT BAD.
NETHER LAUGH OR CRY. BUT IT MADE BURN UP GOOGLE LOOKING UP THE PEOPLE I JUST NEVER KNEW ABOUT.
AN EPIFFINY FOR ANY MUSIC LOVER OF 60'S 70'S MUSIC LOVERS
Wellllll, I'm not sure. Based on my experience in RVN,I have a feeling that many of the stories in this are an amalgamation of a tour of duty that spanned 12 Mo. But you ask what I liked most book, I must say I got a kick out of the authors naivety as it relates to the behavior of 20-21 yr. olds back in the 60's
a lot of struggling with many pretty standard military terms
Yes, what I don't understand is, how is it that during two tours in RVN and more than just a few fire fights I could count on one hand the number of live, in the bush, VC that I actually saw with my own eyes, and the author describes what sounds like he was in daily contact and his description of his A.O. had the area awash in NVA/VC. Could it have happened? well possibly but it would be the exception rather than the rule.
If you think we lost that war you go there sometime and see if that looks like a communist or capitalist country.
constant drumming in the background made it unlistenable.
no clue, gotta check the library
if I were producer id have nixed the background drumming. it made the book unlistenable.
the drumming in the background made the book unlistenable.
Less preachy. We all know Mr. Nash is a big time Lib but we want a story not an explanation
of his vapid political leanings.
only if he wrote his own obituary.
Just what a confused person he really is. If he hates this country (from which he has made untold millions) he should get the huck out of fere.
nausea, and a sense of loathing.
why yes thank you. Graham Nash is clueless.
I don't think you could have made it better. This Gal is a one trick pony.
it is pretty much a rehash of "I'm with the band.
Linda Eastman.....oh no, wait ,she's dead. Lets see.....hummm.....I know, Phyllis Diller. Cmon, look it up.
resignation. I knew from jump street this book was a retread.
Why yes, thank you for asking........ The publisher should be dispatched with all due haste.
I assume you are asking about the book and not the lad himself. My answer is as it always is......stories stories stories. You know, insider stuff and that's what this book is all about.
the minor details that cause you to this you are really getting the "inside" stuff
I have not heard anything else from this Gent. But I think he did a ball peen job.
I loved it, But yet I hated it. It made me laugh, it made me cry. It made me happy yet somehow sad.......extremely.
If your into Bio about your favorite counter-culture heros from the 60's, this book is great.
No, I can only hear the "N" word so many times before I start feeling soiled. I got the picture in the first reading.
The author really did his home work on this but so much was take from his discs and television specials that run from time to time but the book helps bring this tragic story into perspective.
I like relevant minutia in my Bios, and this had plenty.
Not extreme, but the head shaking tragedies leading up to his death screems out "where are the people who care about this man and why don't they help him". The answers are; there where none and he wouldn't allow it if there where.
Good effort by the reader to do a Richard Pryor impersonation..,,,but........FAIL.
It depends, if they want to know how many wheels the 4 track had that the Beatles used to record on in 66' this is the book for you.
Not really. Other than knowing what brand mics where used during the recording of Sgt Pepper there is really no news here.
LOL. maybe an instruction manual, but "story"? No news here.
Why yes, thank you for asking. Any time there are more than 25 "shout outs or name checks in one book, you can bet somebody is at least getting taken out to lunch..... or a new car.....mayhaps.
THE STORY IS DETAIL RICH.
THE INSITE OF THE STORYAND THE LEVEL OF DRUG ABUSE WITHIN THE ENTIRE BAND
YES, WHEN JOE REALIZES HIS WIFE IS AN IMMATURE B*TCH
JOE MUMBLES ABIT
ABOUT IN THE MIDDLE
WHY BILL OF COURSE.
YES IT WAS FINE
MORAL DECAY, SUBSTANCE ABUSE,AND EGOS RAN WILD IN THE ROCK SCENE, BUT WE ALREADY KNEW THAT.
NO INFLECTION. SAVE THE "INSIDE JOKES" FOR THE INSIDERS
YEAH. WHO IS THIS GAL,I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF HER. THE TERM GROUPIE COMES TO MIND.
Report Inappropriate Content