Dr Hardy has a complete mastery of the material. It sounds like he is recalling from memory and it comes across as very conversational. He brings to light the genius of the philosophical thought from India and China and then includes Japan and Korea.
The history of the East is enlightening
The closest comparison is to The Modern Intellectual Tradition: From Descartes to Derrida. However, I think this was better.
The performance was outstanding. Mastery of the material. Conversational and Enthusiastic. You could tell he loved the material and he could not wait to tell you all about it.
The Story was great. Dr Hardy was careful to repeat any lists and he went through them methodically and clearly.
There were many interesting and entertaining parts. You learn about "one hand clapping" and "shooting the messenger"
However the most memorable part that I paused and listened to over and over was:
Practice Earnestly - Zhu Xi
I cried when it was over. I wanted to continue to hear more. I will definitely be listening to this one again and take more notes.
You will definitely come away with a better appreciation of Eastern thought. You will also have a lot that can be applied to your life, like the following:
Knowledge and Action Must go Together
The political and PR POV were glossed over, especially in the Shuttle disasters.
Richard Feynman's analysis stated that management inexplicably believed the probability of failure to be 1000 times less than their working engineers. Feynman concludes "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled"
The Shuttle disaster was more than poor decision making. It bordered on a cavalier incompetence by management but the course painted the management in a much better light.
Case studies have strengths and weaknesses because what is presented is only what supports the conclusion. The shuttle disaster are but one. Having read some of the analysis on these events, I think that the course really misses the mark here and Incredibly, partially blamed the engineer for not making a better case!
The last part of the course had good material. In the end it emphasized techniques to ferret out problems that can be solved earlier vs later.It provided techniques that will help foster discussion, debate and result in better decisions
Very good performance although there was a tendency at times to use straw man arguments.
Very good course. Offered a lot of very good ideas and techniques to combat group think and other decision making pitfalls.
Report Inappropriate Content