Poorly written, but well read. Parts of it were good, but the author opinions are unspported by facts. To claim this is event resulted in the first "real" map and the urban lifestyle is just BS. Reminds me of a college junior - has one idea and beats you to death with it.
This sounded interesting however Audible will not let me download it after purchase. I am not sure what is wrong - but I am not happy.
The introduction used to grind a political axe (pointlessly). I enjoyed the stories but strongly disagree with the politics. Back to nature would be wonderful for a world with under 1 billion people - we are rapidly approaching 7 billion. We either need technology (something the characters in the book use) or we need a euthanasia program.
The author seems obsessed with the sisters alleged female health problems. There are somethings that can be condensed and summarized without impacting the narrative. Menstruation troubles and malformed Utri are some of those things.
Great listen. Very good story and well presented. I guess I need to write 15 words.
Figures and equations don't work in Audiobooks generally. Sometimes the producers will try to make them work with either handouts (hard to read while driving) or detailed descriptions. In this case they did not even try - just a dude reading equations off to you - very frustrating. Chapters 1-4 were good and relatively math free. After that the author gives up on his promise to "keep out the math" and begins inserting equations to "prove his point." I don't need the math to convince me and the narrative is lost with the interruptions of the math.
Everything by Keegan is outstanding and this is no different. Well worth a listen if you have any interest at all in the subject.
Different than most of these war narratives. The authors resist the temptations to make heros and villains.
Great listen - a postive message about government and hope for the future.
An interesting and unvarnished look at the times.
I was a bit nervous when the authors "confessed" they relied on the church for much of thier research. At least the first 3/4 of the book a felt a bit like I was being manipulated, but when the bad things start happening the authors do not try to pull punches. I agree with thier thesis about the event, but I do think they tried a bit hard to not point the finger at the church - no possiable justification for the actions is too small to be discussed (often repeatedly) and no proof of the dissappointment of church leaders int he action is to small to discuss. The pacing is VERY slow for much of the book with lots of degressions and information of little importance.
Report Inappropriate Content