If this had been my first exposure to the Kay Scarpetta stories or to Patricia Cornwell, it would have been my only exposure. I had read (on paper) some of these stories years ago, and remembered the main character fondly. I wish I had read the other reviews before I bought this one. As others have stated, the narrator was more distracting and even annoying than any failings in the story. I wondered how the publishers even let this get past their quality control people. But, I was determined to get through it. Unfortunately, I found the author just as distracting and annoying. This was written many years ago, when the technology in computers and the Internet were still quite limited, so much of her descriptions can be attributed to the passage of time and growth of the industry. But, it is very clear now, with the audience having a much better understanding of it, that when this book was written the author was not as knowledgeable as we were supposed to believe. Like so many other authors, Ms. Cornwell did a lot of technology "name dropping", and then had to take the time to explain to the presumably ignorant public what she was referring to. After a bit, I found this just grating, condescending. It tended to use up a lot of words, which I suspect was part of the intent. The story was not convincing at all. In what world do we live where a state-level medical examiner can become so deeply involved in the workings of federal agencies? Those turf wars are fierce. It just came across as not credible. In fact, I found myself distracted so much by these incongruences that I could not find the time to be annoyed by the narrator and certainly not to find anything in the story to be able to say I enjoyed it. I suggest that IF you want to "read" this book, you do it from a paperback. At least you will be able to judge the author's success or failures based on HER work alone. As for me, I will probably not bother with Kay Scarpetta any longer. That well has been poisoned for me.
Probably not. It is just too long. I normally will make an effort to finish a book, even if I have lost any real interest. I keep hoping it will improve. It was at about halfway through that I found myself wishing, hoping the end was near. Even after the mystery was solved, when the killer(s) were revealed and the problems resolved, it kept on going. I finally stopped listening, leaving another 8 or 10 chapters unheard.A really good book for me is one that moves at a good pace overall. It should have a mixture of fast and slower passages. When I begin to long for the end, I my assessment of that book begins to suffer.
I never finished it, although I felt like the ending for the story had already been established well beyond the end of the recording.
The narrator did a fine job. I did not have a preference for any particular character. Most of them were substantial, and as each was carefully and tediously defined, I felt like I understood each equally. Some behaviors or actions did not seem to fit 1699, but I can handle of literary license if used sparingly.
I would not think this book would translate well as a film. If someone tried, it would need some trimming and changes more appropriate for 1699. The story, as written, would not keep the audience engaged.
It is as if the author was determined to write a massive tome, and sacrificed the story for this goal. Perhaps the editor should have read this book with some objectivity and familiarity with life in 1699 colonial America. I think this 30 hour book could be accomplished in 15 or 20 hours easily. Too bad.
This book was a big disappointment for me, and I tried hard to stick with it. The story was shallow, in that it was never made clear just exactly what was going on, WHY the world had turned so violent or how the angels became so hostile. I do not often read books about angels simply because they tend to trivialize the presence and value of angels, turn angels into servants of MAN and not of GOD, or, as in this book, into vengeful, self-serving versions OF man. I am offended by such depictions. But to make it worse, this was just boring.
The author clearly has no respect for the concept of angels as she has turned them into something despicable and hostile. I think she'd have done better to have chosen a "creature" that has not become so embedded in our literature and faith that such a perversion would not be so hard to envision. It is just too offensive to me to allow me to tolerate the hostile, proud and arrogant beings in this book
Probably not, unless it was another narration by a child character. I will not, however, make a point of avoiding this reader.
No. I found nothing in this book of interest or value. It felt like something "cranked out" in a hurry, by someone early in her career and who needs some seasoning to become a valued author. I do not know this woman's history, but if she is not new to the profession, she is simply lacking in skill or talent to become a truly accomplished author. I prefer to think she is just new, and this will someday be an example of her early works.
It was slow, predictable, and just not engaging for me. It gives a very poor representation of the entire foster system, both for the social workers and foster families. It was simply boring and suggests this author is lacking in either talent, an understanding of the foster system, or the intelligence of readers.
It will not by one by this author.
The narrator was adequate, but not outstanding. This could be, however, because of the book she was reading.
I only got about halfway through it before I gave up. Perhaps it improved, but up to the point where I stopped, I would say no.
The story failed for me, but the narrator was adequate, which improves the overall rating slightly. I will not rule the narrator out in future selections, but I will avoid this author. I think it might be helpful for me to take a closer look at the authors' previous works, and avoid those without a good history. I'm finding more and more that selections I am making here are more and more disappointing. This is one of them.
I did not realize this was not a Kate Shugak story when I bought it. I had some trouble getting into this one, as I did not find the character of Liam engaging. I will pay more attention now that I know the author has another character in the mix.
Honestly, I don't recall finishing it. If I did, I was not sufficiently impressed to recall.
Again, I do not recall the specifics, but I DO like Marguerite Gavin's performances. It took a while to get used to her, as sometimes the inflexions seem out of character or inappropriate, but her depictions of the Alaskan natives, and their mannerisms is spot on!
I am not saying it was a bad book or story, or that you should NOT take it on. For me, this character simply cannot compete w/ Kate Sugak, which is what I was expecting. Some readers/listeners may prefer Liam to Kate. It just depends on the listener.
I enjoyed the narrator and most of the characters. I came away feeling like I know a bit more about wind farms, and the industry. I thought the story moved well, no delays or tedium. I actually found myself thinking of the Longmire series. Somewhat comparable.
I do not recall the name, so if I have I was not impressed enough to have logged his name.
Had I been reading it myself, I probably would not have finished it. It did not excite me, but neither did it bore me. A good narrator can make or break an audio performance for me. The narrator here kept me listening.
No, can't say there was. But I can say that there were some things that I did find overtly lacking. During the entire book, when the sheriff had a "witness" the defendant's attorney never once DEMANDED or even sought to depose that witness. I know enough about it all to know that whatever one side has by way of evidence MUST be revealed, and the existence of a witness upon whom the entire case hinges should have been at the top of the list for this hot-shot, high-profile lawyer. I felt like the sheriff was a little lacking in depth acting so blatantly biased to the point of stupidity. Lots of loose ends, somewhat hastily tied up.
I did enjoy the narrator! I'd look for more of his work in a heartbeat.
I will not reveal the true nature of this story. It did start out as an enjoyable imitation of many of the similar mysteries taking Biblical characters and drawing overt connections to some modern-day conspiracies. It could not be considered a great tale, but it was moving along very well, until the very end. I must say I was profoundly disappointed in the author. He simply went much to far in his absurdities. It said to me that his author had to reach further than his abilities, and he failed miserably. I will not say DO NOT BOTHER, for some may find it less offensive, even perfectly acceptable.. I think the author chose a lazy, silly, absurd ending to what could have otherwise been a good tale.
Disappointed beyond words. Weak and absurd beyond all reason.
The narrator did a fine job. I would have had some difficulty with the Latin and Italian names and passages.
I do have an extreme reaction, but not as you ask. It is just embarrassing for the author to have chosen to end it as he did. It tells me he was either in such a hurry that he was grasping at straws, or he does not have all of the skills needed to craft a truly great story.
Such a shame. It will probably be the only one of his books I will ever "read". I cannot recommend it.were it not for the failings in the story's ending, I would have rated it much higher, but such was the nature of the final pages. Too bad.
I would rate this as VERY significant, if only as a stunning shock of reality. I recall my grandmother telling how her younger siblings had died during the epidemic, but gave it little thought. How I wish now I could discuss that time with her. She was a young adult, old enough to have understood what was happening around her, and to have given us a remarkable accounting of life in Missouri/Kansas at the time. How I wonder that she only lost 2 of the 10 children, and large extended family!
I have not read any other books by John Barry, but I certainly will. I am reminded of THE DEVIL IN THE WHITE CITY, but Erik Larson, another revealing historical account, also narrated by Scott Brick.
Scott Brick's mafter-of-fact naration lends a quality of credibility to an otherwise hard-to-believe accounting.
A Silent, Patient Killer Destined to Return.
There is an enormous amount of information in this book, beginning with how the medical community of the US came into the 20th century in a shamefully unregulated state, how it evolved and rose quickly to take on the greatest public health emergency in our world's history. Having set the stage, the author then explains a bit about how epidemics develop and how the state of the world at that time fostered this disaster, how a number of preliminary localized epidemics of measles, polio, encephalitis all paved the way for this new, virulant virus to grow, evolve and eventually devestate the entire world. My presumptions and ignorance of the entire event have been revealed, leaving me frightened for the future. We have no living survivors to testify first hand to the experience, to the true horrors of the time, and history has already begun glossing over the dreadful mistakes made. For students of American history, this book tells us of a side of our American government and Wilson's presidency that we should all know about. What was done in the name of patriotic support is just as stunning and frightening as the statistics regarding lives lost to this epidemic. This is a CRUCIAL read for us all.
Unfortunately, there is so much information to convey that at times, the author tends to repeat himself, recounting the same stories multipl times throughout the books. This would be a very difficult book for me to sit and read, but it is well suited for this audible presentation.
I was intrigued at first with this book. I was disappointed with it when it fianlly ended. The story is a narrative from a monk with the Church of England at the beginning of WWII, a time not often depicted in stories about monks. I soon found I was learning a great deal about the Church of England of modern times (I am old enough to see it as "modern"), but, as with most stories placed cloistered environments there was a clear definition of the characters to like and dislike, love and hate. While it felt formula-based, it was interesting all the same. Sometimes the narrator didn't seem genuine in some of the characters' statements, often inferring some attitude that I was not sure was intended. I found this a little distracting. But, as the story progressed it seemed to be taking a totally unexpected turn, moving from the monastery into the world so foreign to the 17-year monk. More interesting information about the way the Church functioned and how it reintroduced its isolated members into the traditional world. I was still enjoying it, but feeling like the story was getting lost a bit. Then the bad-buys became good-guys and the good drifted into the bad side, and it all became a little muddled. Clearly the author was well-versed in the Church and its willingness to care for its own, about modern psychologhy and even current views on metaphysical theories, although I am not convinced that these were applicable in the 1940's. However, the last 3rd of this very lengthy story just got lost. The author spent more time psychoanalyzing the characters, and the value of understanding and forgiveness than on resolving the conflicts in the story. I was actually relieved when the story ended, but then the narrator continued on with a monologue from the author. "Give it up ", I thought, and stopped the recording. I felt like the author or editors were either trying to justify the dismal twist of the story or convert their audience into some belief or another. I didn't not wait to see.
Personally, I'd not say this was a bad book. I came away feeling I had learned some bit more about a world otherwise foreign to me. I DID find myself agreeing with the author's overt lessons about listening, understanding, and forgiving others and oneself for perceived transgressions, and I did enjoy the voice of the narrator, if not his intrepretation of some of the dialogs. However, I also understand that for most readers, these are not necessarily good selling points. Based on the story alone, I found this book wonting. I was very disappointed, and if I were not almost obsessive about finishing books I have started, I probably would have gently set this one aside at the midpoint and moved on.
If you would like to learn more about the Church of England and how it is structured, or a bit more about charismatic healing and the connections between psychic healing, the Church and how Devine energy, focused energy, prayer and mysticism all interconnect (at least according to this author), this is a fine example. But, do not expect a strong story line. It simply is not there. Sorry.
For many years, I lived like so many, feeling NOT NORMAL but not knowing why. Once I realized why, I began to understand more and more about myself, and just HOW I am different. I am not sure anyone except those of us who live it can fully appreciate just what the author is describing here. I would recommend this book to anyone and everyone, if only to broaden the readers' views on a world many may not even know exists. It will open your eyes to just how such a brilliant mind can be hidden inside a troubled boy. Mr. Robison is different, not just in how his brain works, but in his ability to turn his difference into such an asset.Even at my age, even I found inspiration and hope after this book. For someone 50 years younger, the potential is wonderful, if only so they can come to understand the nature of their difference and learn to not blame themselves along the way. This is the kind of book one will want to buy to share with others. Look/listen closely to Mr. Robison's description of how he saw/heard the sounds from the mega-amps, watching and understanding the sounds through all the senses, then turned that incredible insight into a musical/magical instrument. There is some depth in his perceptions at that moment that many will not recognize ... don't miss it.
This book started out well. In fact, I enjoyed the book completely for the first 1/3rd of the story, until I realized that this is just a horrific collection of unimaginably gruesome ways for people to die And die they do, one after another, one bloody,paintful and nightmareish way after another. I can tolerate such horror when it is peppered throughout, but in this book, the gore and bloodshed is as thick as peanut butter on a PBJ sandwich. To make matters worse, the actions of the "heros" of this story are so absurd as to be insulting to the reader. As I got into the 2nd half of the book, I began to realize that it was escalating to the point where I was not sure if I wanted to continue. But I kept hoping/expecting something would change. Time after time, just when I thought one character or another would manage to escape some horrific fate, I came to expect disappointment. Before long, I realized that this book was just DARK. The entire story, how it was constructed and how it unfolded, is discouraging, depressing, and frightening, not in what is happening to the characters/victims, but frightening to realize that someone could write such a book, that a publisher would promote it, and that the public might read it. This type of book, these descriptions, in the hands and minds of suseptable people is what scares me. While I do not advocate censorship, I also do not advocate that this book be considered anything but dismal, dark, and DANGEROUS. This author scares me, and I will remember the name, as one to avoid. The mind that could write such a book, and consider it worthy ... this is what scares me. I would not want this person for a neighbor.
Report Inappropriate Content