First off, the story is empty of any depth or interest, the dialogue sophomoric, and the writing is lifeless and downright boring. This book is lacking in any meaning, and when the theme finally gets revealed I felt embarrassed for the silly characters, and shocked that the author was putting them, and me, through such a trivial life. Granted, I was expecting the same quality of writing and imaginative story telling of Urrea's first book, Hummingbird's Daughter, and it had none of it's captivating complexity, lyrical cadence, original thinking, magical beauty, and rich descriptive writing. Beautiful North is more like a first draft of a first book, not a sequel to the great book, Hummingbird's Daughter. It is hard to believe that Beautiful North is even written by the same author.
It is bad enough that the writing and story had nothing to offer. Why would the author choose a reader that just makes this very bad book worse? The reader of Beautiful North manages to make the Spanish sound flat and tinny, and the way she over-annunciates each syllable, it is more like she is trying to teach English than read it. Probably, no reader could make this uninteresting book worth the time and money, but her choppy, dull style of reading exaggerates the poor writing.
Consistent with the meaningless theme and lifeless writing in this book, the characters lack any depth and range. Once again, comparing to Hummingbird's Daughter, the sorry lack of development of character, puzzles me because in his first book, the author did an exceptional job at creating lovable characters with believable, interesting flaws. No one in Hummingbird's Daughter was simple, they had the full range of human emotion, with quirky and unique fullness.
What was Urrea doing when he wrote Beautiful North? What was he thinking? It is a mystery to me how he could have published such a bad book.
Report Inappropriate Content