Is it just me, or ar the narrations getting worse, even for best-selling authors? Rather than selecting a narrator capable of characterizing females as well as males, this Baldacci reading sounds more like an animated kids' film. The female charaters seem patched in, sounding as though they aren't recorded at the same time or place as the rest of the narration, and probably aren't. Somehow, even the sound quality appears different when they suddenly switch to a female patch; then the narrator resumes after a pause with "...she said". It is almost a charicature; and, at the very least, is very distracting. The abrupt change causes you to lose track of the conversation. The "Camel Club" novels aren't my favorites of Baldacci, anyway, because they always seem like over the top with bumbling, stereotypical characters, and lame narration; but, this patched together new narration makes it even worse. It probably centers on "Oliver Stone" more than many of the others; yet, the narration trivializes it. If they insist on using multiple narrators because the main one may be incapable of characterizing females, they should at least record them at the same time and place, assuring smooth continuity. This almost sounds like the robot voices on answering machines intruding into the acceptable narration. I don't expect this from this type of author, am unlikely to buy another "Camel Club" adventure.
I have read Finder before, and found his books deeply engrossing; if not paranoia-inducing. I was deeply engrossed in this one; then, an hour before the end of part 1, it automatically started again at the beginning. I deleted, redownloaded, etc., to no avail. I wrote tech support and they told me to redownload, which i did yet again. A chunk more was available; but it broke up again. It did the same on my iPad and iPhone; and I have downloaded literally hundreds of books without this problem. The tech even told me to download in a different format (which I don't want), then told me I can listen to it on my computer by streaming. That is NOT why I get audiobooks--to be tied to my computer! So, I went onto part 2 with a big patch of the plot missing. Then, at the precipice of the conclusion to the mystery, it suddenly started at the beginning again; again about an hour before the end of part 2. I'll bet it was good; but incredibly annoying that I'll never know.
I have read everything that Nelson DeMille wrote, and I think he walks on water among writers. He, not only is a master of intrigue, character development and plot interest, but usually manages to bring levity to the most tense situations with a clever, articulate male protagonist. This one had virtually no character development, from my point of view, and almost read like a tragic documentary. It was a tragic historical thesis, and heroic on the part of the characters; but they were shallow--just political. I'm not sorry I got it, but was truly looking forward to a DeMille treat. I have read his books, admittedly, in reverse chronology; but am rarely disappointed.
I had serious misgivings about wasting money on what has been described to me as a "guy's writer". But, during a sale I decided to try this book of Cussler's, which appeared to have a traditional mystery plot with a historical context. I was really ready to admit my misgivings when the mystery was solved, the perp caught, and it was what I thought was the end of the book. It was an interesting concept. Then it went off track, seeming to change modes, dwelling at great length on the San Francisco earthquake for some unknown reason, seemed filled with corny lines and situations (coming up to his "love", whom he had seen all of a few times, while she was tending to the mangled and dying earthquake victims, with the line "can you help me? My arm is gone"). After that, it was a tedious plunge into the dynamics of railroad trains, and a silent movie-seeming implausibe and unbearably corny ending. I stand by my first impression--shallow characters, corney relationships, and lots of "man-stuff"--not deep
When "Lincoln Laywer" came out with a smirky Mathew McConnahy, I figured all Connelly's succeeding books would be written for the big screen, rather than the small reader. Even though there is a shameless comment about making a movie of the story with said McConnahy, the story line is sound, and perfectly suited for today's economic woes, and the cottage industries it creates to further milk us all. Of course, it is destined to be another movie, but still a great read on "the small page".
Wise-cracking Myron Bolitar and Win are more entertaining and articulate than ever in this long-overdue return to the witty reparte of Coben's sports agent/detective and his brilliant, beautiful, rich but madly psychopathic friend and protector. I actually stopped reading Coben for a spell, not wanting to wallow in the seemingly endless darkness and misery of kidnappings and child abductions. Wit and humor trump suffering and tragedy, and make for a much more enjoyable reading experience. Steven Weber is great as the narrator.
This was one of those "nothing is what it seems" plots where a seemingly normal existence is discovered to be anything but that, after a doctor's wife dies in a skiing accident. Although I felt he was unnaturally naive throughout it, it made for a really good read.
While this narrator is a great character actor (on The Closer and others), he breathes no life into this potentially thrilling and harrowing plot. Everything is a laid-back speech pattern, with nothing inspiring the emotions appropriate to the story line. He just mosies along, sounding almost bored, no matter what was happening. To make matters worse, the sound was awful; like someone recorded it from an old hollow-sounding tape or record. Three stars for the predictable but frightening plot, but the narrator needs to stick to acting--or learn to convey some range of emotion when needed.
Another example of a ho-hum narrator putting the wrong emphasis on the wrong words, mispronouncing simple words, and generally appearing as though he was not an experienced narrator and/or hadn't read the book enough to get the gist of the dialogue. Also, Stone was "played" sounding like a scruffy street cop, even while using stilted but correct grammar at a morgue. He sounded seedy, which is the antithesis of his character. Woods' novels are always less than profound; but good narration would have helped this one a lot. Narrator occasionally gave certain characters another character's voice. This was made to sound like a cheap paperback gumshoe book, with Stone fantasizing about sticking his tongue in an attractive woman's ear. Probably old enough to avoid political correctness; but he just comes off sleazy. Barely worth the read unless you get it for a very low price. Don't waste a credit.
Scott Brick would have nailed this book. But, as it was, the narrator seemed like the disembodied voice of a GPS some of the time (especially the beginning). This hurt the book, in that the emphasis was often put on the wrong or inappropriate word in a sentence or dialogue. Often, it was confusing, and sometimes even conveyed an entirely different meaning. While you were trying to figure out what the character was really trying to say, the audiobook advanced, and you either had to rewind or miss some of the dialogue. It would have served the narrator better if he had read the book, or read it more than once, so he was aware of the inflection and meaning of the sentence he was characterizing. He appeared to read with the same "voice up and down" pattern no matter what was being said. It was like simplified narration 101--put some inflection in your voice while reading--but the idea should be to do it when and where it is meaningful and suitable. Good authors like Finder should insist on well-versed and talented narrators who don't make their work suffer.
Never seeming to run out of clever wisecracking reparte, DeMille additionally adds historical and geographical depth to this great read. Scott Brick makes it even more enjoyable.
Report Inappropriate Content