By the time I was done with this audio book I was so fed up with the characters that I wish that the shark could have eaten the entire town (including the police chief hero). I was totally sympathetic to poor old Jaws, and would have probably eaten these nasty, manipulative, pathetic people too (were I a shark). Also, I know that society was different back in the 70s, but I did not appreciate the racist or sexist references and assumptions. There were other aspects of the story that I found equally as tasteless. I am surprized that the shark could even digest these people. All I can say is GO JAWS! Munch away! Eat the author of this piece of crap while you are at it. My recommendation-- stick with the movie you get the story line without having to put up with the characters-- also, it really is classic fish terror at its best.
This is a good recording of a Jane Austen classic and well worth listening to. While I generally prefer to hear a woman narrator when it comes to Jane Austen, I did think that this narrator did an especially good job and so maybe have changed my mind about this. The annoying thing is that this recording is missing the first page and a half of the story. Luckily this is a public domain novel, and so the text is freely available via the internet. However, this technical glitch did make me bump my rating down a star. The good thing is that in trying to find the novel online, I learned more about Jane Austen, and so I guess it was not such a bad thing that I had to do some research.
I agree that there was a complete mismatch between reader and story, which really made this audio book a difficult listen. The reader actually sounds a lot like Annette Funicello, which was really funny when she read some of the racier parts or when she tried to imitate the voice of the antagonist. Indeed, her voices were quite bad. At one point she attempted an Hispanic accent and only managed to sound like Dracula. I think that she might be a good reader for a different type of book, but sounded silly reading this one.
Also, this might be one of Koontz's older novels and is certainly not one of his best. While the story was okay and did have a great deal of suspense, many of the ideas that underlied the book were dated and irritating (e.g. a woman was described as undesirable because of a hand deformity, as well as other sorts of sexist ideas and ways of valuing people based on physical appearance). As a woman, I did not enjoy listening to this stuff, which is silly considering that the main protagonist is female and thus the book must have been to some extent written for a feminine readership. All in all-- the novel was a pretty flat, generic and one-dimensional story.
I am a real sucker for Retrievers and so my review is absolutely biased. Also, I love how Koontz writes about these intelligent dogs (remember Einstein?). While I do not like everything Koontz writes, I do like his dog stories and definitely think that animals are smarter than we give them credit for. I listened to the first three quarters of this book nonstop and was completely engaged by the storyline. The characters were well developed, and the villians were absolutely terrifying. Also, I like the fact that one of the protagonists, was a little girl with Downe's Syndrome. She was not a victem, but was a self empowered strong human being. Bravo Koontz for imparting this sensitivity and for defying stereotypes. I was a bit disappointed by the abruptness of the ending, but all in all this was one of the better Koontz books that I have listened to.
I don't always agree with how Krakauer does things, but boy can he tell a story. I have enjoyed everything that he writes, and "Into the Wild" is by far my favorite. I was so enchanted and frustrated by the character of Christopher McCandeless that I felt like I could have somehow been there for him. Now that's good writing! What an extraordinary and brave person this young man was, and Krakauer has captured his character with sensitivity (if not objectivity). Christopher needs to be remembered (despite the fact that he probably would not want to be). I highly recommend this book, and am inspired to go see the movie.
This was a lovely and unusual story about conjoined twins and their relationship both with each other and with the world. I was completely unaware of how common this situation is (relatively speaking) and so greatly appreciated this sensitive look into the lives of these two characters. The story was so engaging that I did not stop listening to it until it was done and felt like I myself was attached to their outcome. My only disappointment was that I do not think that the story was fully told. It seemed to end rather abruptly. Regardless, I am planning on listening to this one again.
The crying woman was really really annoying! The acting was too melodramatic. It might have been spookier if it had not been so over the top. As it was... not one goose bump.
Serano offers a fairly simplistic approach to pain management, i.e. as soon as you realize that your pain is psychological it will go away. While he makes some interesting points, I also think that he might be taking things too far. While he starts off with a medical disclaimer urging people to get appropriate diagnoses for their ails, this is but a wink and a nod to his lawyer, as he goes on to question most ills, attributing injuries to emotional factors. While I am a huge believer in mind body medicine and think that mental awareness helps with any condition, I am also unwilling to let go of the idea that injury is possible. Maybe I am wrong and am doomed to a life of pain (at least for the next few days). Unfortuneately, I know that I hurt myself and so it seems logical that there is a cause and effect relationship. It might be violating Hakim's razor to look for a more deep-seated and complicated emotional reason for every pain that crops up. The human body is afterall a biological/mechanical system too. I could blame all my pains on my co-workers, friends, family etc., but really ibuprophen is quicker, cheaper and easier....
I do not think that Marley was that bad, and so the book was not terribly interesting. I used to have a Chesapeake who did this sort of stuff and worse. Maybe I should have written a book about her.
The author paints an interesting senario, and I was certainly dazzled by the prose.... However, the science driving his hypothesis was actually quite weak. For one, DNA evidence can not be used to identify the remains found in the tomb as Jesus. That's just silly. It did not work for OJ and it certainly does not work for Jesus of Nazareth! All the DNA evidence proves is that person A and B were not related (okay so what), the rest is just story telling. Also, the names in the inscriptions were not quite as clear cut as the author would have the reader believe. Nothing in the tomb reads "Here rests Jesus of Nazareth." Rather the inscriptions on the ossuaries refered to a couple of women named Mary (not unusual), a guy named Joseph (also not unusual), a guy named Jesus (not unusual at all), and a guy named Judah (again not unusual). This assembly of names is less of a coincidence when one considers how the inscriptions are twisted to fit the pattern. The name Judah is used as evidence, despite the fact that there is no such person described in the Bible--(the author's attempts to slip him in there, but I am not convinced). The author seems to be trying too hard to get his hypothesis to work. Another thing to consider is how a simple carpenter from Nazareth could afford such a tomb anyway. Rock cut architecture is extremely expensive, even today.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.