Larra

I'll have to listen to Trapped again because I feel like I didn't follow everything terribly well. Hearne delves into so many different myths and religions that I had a hard time keeping it all straight. Perhaps if I had read the book instead of listening, the names wouldn't have gotten so confused for me.

The sexual tensions between Atticus and his apprentice has been building so delightfully throughout the IDC books and Hearne (and subsequently Oberon and Daniels) couldn't have handled it better.

If Luke Daniels read a book on how to watch paint dry, I'm pretty sure I'd still want to listen over and over again.

Absolutely, I would recommend this book. Campy good fun with entertaining and dynamic characters.

Wish I knew....... I'd go read them.

The only thing I found disappointing at all is that she hasn't narrated MORE books. It's hard to adjust to a different reader when trying to listen to another Crusie book, because Vigesaa really seemed to capture the comic tone and created the perfect little nuances of the different characters. She pulled off all of male characters without making them sound like a bunch of sappy dopes.

I immediately went and found the sequel, FAKING IT, and loved the crap out of that one, too.

I started Crusie with these two books. I'll be crushed if it's all downhill from here. I've hated that these books are now a "known" to me, and won't be a fabulous new discovery until the dementia really sets in.

I've enjoyed other Julie Garwood books. Don't know what happened here.

I finished the book two days ago and can't even recall what it was about....... that's how much of an impression it made. I think breakfast had more of a lasting fond impression.

sure. the men were a bit off.

i wouldn't watch it, but i'm not a huge tv watcher.

yawn.

This incredibly pompous overinflated piece of scheisse could have been soooo much shorter without missing any of its pretentiousness.

Shorter, less stupid. The characters all seem to be in need of colonoscopies in order to find their common sense.

If I hear his voice, it will be really hard to not associate it with this travesty. I'm not sure how I feel about his performance. If I picture him rolling his eyes and being embarrassed by the drivel that he was paid to read, then I can try to get over how annoyed I was by his performance and attribute it all to the barfable prose with which he had to work.

I guess cutting out the author would have saved a lot of aggravation.

I gave it two stars instead of one since I did see the train wreck through to the end. My bad.