If you dislike, or more to the point, don't understand someone's work, why write their biography? From his final remarks, it's obvious that Greenfield was afraid of Dr. Leary's work. He declined to actually meet the man when he had the opportunity because he was concerned he might be required to take LSD.
To the point, when Mr. Greenfield can make Dr. Leary appear inept, foolish, pompous, in error, self-serving, dishonest, or disingenuous, he slants his text in just that way. Yet in fact the writer did not know the doctor and all the writer's observations are second or third hand.
I was extremely annoyed with this huge work. I wonder who commissioned it? I STRONGLY CAUTION ANYONE WHO HAS READ LEARY'S OWN WORKS AND HAS A GOOD OPINION OF HIM not to bother with this book. You will lean nothing of value you didn't learn from FLASHBACKS, and what you will learn here is gossip, not verifiable and, frankly, not at all important.
What is important is that Timothy Leary discovered the gateway to a cure for psychosis. Using John Lilly's metaphor, Leary helped to develop a program language for the human bio-computer. Unfortunately, his work, as it continues in his native country, is clandestine. For this we can thank people with tiny minds like Mr. Greenfield.
Mr. Lawor's reading was quite respectable. Please let him know, however, that the Neoplatonist, Aleister Crowley's name rhymes with 'holy,' not 'foully.'
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.