"Tried too hard."
I felt that the author got to caught up in showing off her knowledge.
Packing for mars
The narrator was phenomenal- all characters were great
I understand the style and what the author wanted to achieve, but she just took too long to tell a story, as I said there were Points where it wasn't about the story, but about the author saying look how superior I am over you.
This is a literary book, it is slow - as most literary books are. She does a gOod job within the style; but needs to be careful that her pretentiousness doesn't show through. If you like literary go for it. If you are a psychiatrist or psych nurse - you will find more honesty in the E.R.
"For the love of dogs"
The narration done in the dog's voice.
Seeing your life through your animal's eyes and heart and how that animal loves you through all your faults.
He captured the heart of the dog.
Perfect title.
I was not sure I would like it, since I am not into race cars; but I did nothing the whole day and listened to it straight through.
"Phenomenal"
This shows a different side to Achilles and patrocolous that is so well written.
Obviously The Illiad.
No.
I would not: the title is perfect.
Anyone interested in the story of Achilles should read this.
"Overrated"
Buy not buying it.
Jane Austin is an overrated hack that only writes using one-dimensional characters.
The performance was fine.
It is not about cutting, but about adding depth to characters.
I finally read this because of all the wonderful reviews about the first impressions and societal laws and rules; but it is a piece of hack writing with flat characterization.
"Fun"
Just plain fun
I can't write without spoiling the book.
The wife.
Good question - I do not know.
A must read.