"greatbook!"
oh yes, i have read the book and seen the movie (manhunter). i love the audiobook the best. because i don't see well and anyway, i enjoy someone reading to me. that way i don't miss a thing. i find my eyes tire too quickly and i end up skipping half the book.
it is a good story. i will listen to again and again.
silence of the lambs by the same author. maybe because the y were written by the same author.
a clear crisp voice. easy on the ears.
when reba was with frances and he was watching those movies of his next victim. i remember that when i read the book and saw the movie. again that moment struck me as very very scary.
"A GOOD STORY THAT COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER"
YES. THE STORY IS GOOD IF YOU LIKE TRUE CRIME. SOME PARRTS WERE TOO SLOW THO. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT CHARLES' YOUTH.
IT WAS TOO SLOW. IT SHOULD HAVE ENDED AT LEAST AN HOUR EARLIER.
HE READ FINE.
NO. WHAT ELE IS THERE TO SAY? THE BOOK WAS TOO LONG I WAS GETTING BORED.
"i liked this story. it was a different kind of boo"
it was a refreshing story. i was entertained. there were no big moments but it was just a nice story.
when edward read the letter from his father.
very good!
i smiled at many parts. i liked the ending too.
i would have loved to have known more about edward's Father. i don't know why his Mother did not make more efforts to keep in touch with what was going on with edward.
"NO SUBSTANCE HERE. POOR CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT"
MAYBE SOMEONE YOUNGER.
THE CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT AND THE STORY DEVELOPMENT. I LIKE WHEN A STORY UNFOLDS, THIS STORY JUST HAPPENED. AND IT WAS VERY THIN.
THEY WERE GOOD. NO, THEY WERE GREAT.
THE NARRATORS WERE GOOD. IT COULD HAVE BEEN A GOOD STORY IF THEY JUST DEVELOPED IT BETTER. I LIKE TO KNOW ALL THE MAIN CHARACTERS. I FELT LIKE I ONLY KNEW ANY OF THEM THRU THE CONVERSATIONS THEY HAD WITH EACH OTHER.
"THINGS AREN'T ALWAYS AS THEY SEEM"
OH YES! IT WAS A GREAT LISTEN. IT WAS A DIFFERENT KIND OF BOOK. THERE WERE LOTS OF SURPRISES IN IT.
THE LITTLE "SURPRISES" THAT HAPPENED DURING THE BOOK. I WAS NOT EXPECTING SOME OF THESE THINGS TO HAPPEN.
THERE WERE SO MANY SCENES I LIKED IT IS TOO HARD TO PICK ONE OF THEM.
I WOULD BE A SPOILER IF I SAY.
THE BOOK WAS QUITE UNIQUE. IT WAS A GREAT READ YET, I DON'T THINK IT WOUDL MAKE A GOOD MOVIE....IT WOULD SEEM TO MELODRAMATIC. THE BOOK WAS ONE A MOST ENJOYABLE READ. I WANT TO READ MORE BY THIS AUTHOR.
"IT WAS AN OK BOOK."
I LIKED MOST OF THE BOOK. BUT I FELT THE BOOK WENT ON TOO FAR. IT SHOULD HAVE ENDED EARLIER. I COULD FEEL DISAPPOINTMENT CREEPING IN ON ME IN THE LAST HOUR OR SO OF THE BOOK.
I DID NOT LIKE IT. THAT'S ALL I WILL SAY.
THE READER WAS FINE AS MOST OF THE READERS ARE. AND READING AN ENTIRE BOOK CAN'T BE EASY!
NOPE.
THE BOOK WAS ENTERTAINING, AND I AM NOT SORRY I BOUGHT IT, BUT IT REALLY WAS NOT A GREAT BOOK.
"GOOD STORY. I WAS ENTERTAINED."
I LIKED THE FUNNY IDEAS THAT CHARLOTTE HAD ABOUT SEX AND LOVE. SHE WAS AN ADOLESSENT GIRL WHO WAS KINDA QUIRKY.
I LIKED THE STORY VERY MUCH.
WHEN CHARLOTTE WAS TALKING TO SISTER SUPERIOR AT THE CONVENT. ALSO SOME OF THE THINGS CHARLOTTE WAS THINKING MADE ME SMILE. KIDS ARE FUNNY AND THIS BOOK DID A GREAT JOB IN JUST TELLING A FUN STORY.
IT IS ALWAYS NICE TO HAVE SOME ONE READ TO YOU. SHE HAD A GOOD VOICE FOR THIS JOB!
YES I DID. IT WAS A SHORT BOOK AND I READ IT ALL THIS EVENING.
"A MOST ENJOYABLE READ"
YES. IT WAS ENTERTAINING. THE STORY HAD DEPTH. I READ THE BOOK WITHIN TWO DAYS.
IT WAS BELIEVABLE. WELL THOUGHT OUT. NO FANCY TWISTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT WAS JUST A GOOD STORY.
IT IS HARD TO SAY WHICH WAS MY FAVE. AND THERE WAS MORE THAN ONE READER SO I DON'T KNOW WHO READ WHAT CHARACTER. I WILL JUST SAY THAT WILL WAS MY FAVORITE CHARACTER.
MOST OF THE TIME WHEN I ANSWER THIS QUESTION I CHOOSE SOMEONE WHOM I HAVE A QUESTION FOR. IN THIS CASE I THINK I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE OUT WILL, LOUISA AND NATHAN. I THINK ALL THREE OF THEM DESERVE A NICE DINNER.
THIS BOOK WAS MORE FOR WOMEN (IMHO) BUT I DO THINK MEN MITE LIKE IT TOO. THE STORY IS VERY SATISFYING.
"ENTRTAINING BUT LACKING SOMETHING"
IT WAS NOT WASTED. AND I LIKED THE ENDING. IT WAS NOT ONE OF MY FAVORITES THO.
SURE IF I LIKED WHAT THE STORY WAS ABOUT.
ESRA. HE DID A GREAT JOB WITH HIS VOICE. HE SOUNDED KIND OF SPOOKY. I LIKED FRANK AND JERRY TOO.
NOT FOR ME. BUT I CAN SEE SOME PEOPLE MITE LOVE A FOLLOWUP.
IF YOU LIKE ACTION IF THIS WAS MADE INTO A MOVIE YOU WOULD LIKE IT VERY MUCH.
"WELL RESEARCHED STORY OF THE OPPRESSIO OF THE FLDS"
I PROBABLY WILL LISTEN TO IT AGAIN. I LIKED THE STORY.
THE RESEARCH THAT WAS DONE. YOU GET A REAL PICTURE OF HOW THE FLDS OPERATES AND HOW THE FLDS TREATS WOMAN LIKE THEY ARE MEAT.
I LIKED THE READING SO THIS IS NOT A CRITICISM. BUT NO CHARACTER STOOD OUT AS THE BEST. IT WAS JUST READ. BUT IT WAS A GOOD READ!
FLDS A CULT FROM HELL.
I LIKED THE EXTRA TIDBIT OF THE AUTHOR. IT WAS AN ENJOYABLE READ.
"GREAT TRUE CRIME BOOK."
YES. I REALLY ENJOYED THE STORY. AND IT DID NOT JUST END AT THE TRIAL. THE STORY CONTINEUED ON AND IT WAS QUITE COMPREHENSIVE.
THAT IT WAS SO WELL RESEARCHED. IT EWENT A LITTLE FURTHER THAN A LOT OF CRIME BOOKS.
GREAT READER. CRISP VOICE. EASY TO LISTEN TO.
ALL ABOUT ME, MATT BAKER
IF YOU LIKE TRUE CRIME, YOU WILL LIKE THIS STORY. IT IS SATISFYING ANG LEAVES NO QUESTIONS. I WILL READ THIS ONE AGAIN.