Prelude: A lot of people seem to enjoy this book, so you might as well.
I almost always finish the audiobooks I purchase, and I finished this one. But it was a chore, not a pleasure. The book failed for me on so many levels, but many devolve to a set of unlikable, boring characters with inexplicable motivations.
Why does Damien, a warrior priest, instigate the quest to recover Ciani's stolen memories and adept skills? The author tells us it is because Damien is in love with Ciani, but it isn't believable. He hardly knows her at the start of the journey, and once the journey begins, he mostly avoids speaking with her. Sure, he obsesses over her in countless internal monologues, but it's an illustration of puppy love, not the type of love that would motivate a long journey by a mature man to confront a dangerous foe.
Why does Damien hate Tarrant, the powerful dark adept that joins them on the journey? It could be because Tarrant lacks basic human values, but the author roots the conflict in Damien's religious beliefs. This is emphasized in countless internal monologues, and through some of their interactions. The problem is that the tenets of the religion are never presented. So the conflict, which represents a major plot thread, has no understandable basis. In fact, Tarrant is by far the more interesting and likable of the two characters, which makes Damien's hatred seem churlish.
Did I mention the countless internal monologues, which go nowhere and reveal little? Half way through the book, my greatest wish was to see Damien die a horrible, horrible death. By the end, I was just happy to be finished with him and the rest.
There are things to like about the book, such as an interesting and novel world. Unfortunately, I found it to be populated by tedious characters, a poorly explained magic system, and contradictions that made my jaw drop.
I really enjoyed the first two installments of this series. They had some flaws, such as the implausibly large aliens, but they were fun space opera. So I was really looking forward this one. After listening to it, all I feel is indifference. There are a number of reasons for this.
First, the protagonist seems to have no real feelings. For example, he expresses brief remorse about a critical decision relating to his fiancé, then the story moves on. His mother is on Earth, which is threatened by the aliens, yet he almost never thinks about her. He feels bad about a decision to abandon a group of people in dire need of rescue, but there's little beyond that to indicate he cares about their fate. What we get from Kloos in this book is cardboard emotions and a static protagonist.
Second, information about the Lankies has progressed from near zero to near zero (i.e., not at all) over the course of three novels. Nobody has examined the corpses of dead Lankies to learn more about their biology? Nobody has attempted to determine their social behavior by observing their association patterns? Nobody has tracked their attack patterns to determine where they might be coming from? Really? Nothing?
Third, this book does little to advance the overall story. There's some action to keep us entertained, but the war against the Lankies seems to be going nowhere.
Fourth, the story is getting ever more implausible. For example, the Lankies take Mars but leave Earth alone. Why would they not immediately take out the main source of opposition in the system? When the fleet returns to Earth, why did they not use the successful tactic discovered at the beginning of the book to take out the waiting seed ships?
I'll probably listen to the next installment of the series, but unless there's substantial character and story development, and doubt I'll go further, which is a shame given how well the series started.
This was a fun book, despite the fact that it relies on a premise that is, frankly, a bit absurd. In no reasonable world do pro-choice and pro-life groups "compromise" by allowing not only retroactive abortions (i.e., the flat-out murder of teenagers), but also the use of teens as body farms. It would be abhorrent to both groups, just as it is expected to be abhorrent to nearly all readers. Because I found the basic premise to be ridiculous, I had a hard time suspending my disbelief, and it thus took me a while to get into the story. But I'm glad that I persisted. The characters and interesting and believable as they respond to real threats. And the horror of the process, which is mostly shrouded in mystery for much of the book, is chillingly illustrated towards the end by actual unwinding of one of the less sympathetic characters. Furthermore, the narration is superb. So despite the rickety premise, I really enjoyed the book, and I'm looking forward to the remaining installments.
Julian Comstock is an unusual story for science fiction, a 16th century tragedy, presented in a 19th century style, set in the 22nd century. It's also a first person account written by a friend of the title character, which has the consequence of leaving much about Julian, and about the world in which the story is set, unexplained. If you're looking for an uplifting adventure story, or a geeky exposition on post-collapse technology, you might look elsewhere. But if you like a good story, beautifully told, check this one out. Although the stories and characters are quite different, the tone reminded me a bit of The Great Gatsby, particularly Fitzgerald's last line: "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." The narration is very well done, though a bit melancholic, but it fits the nature of the tale. Like a previous reviewer, I really didn't want this one to end.
Report Inappropriate Content
If you find this review inappropriate and think it should be removed from our site, let us know. This report will be reviewed by Audible and we will take appropriate action.