There were many of them but one in particular was being a Big fish living in a small pond.
It's Okay not to follow life by the book; doing unorthodox actions will also do the job, as long as it makes sense.
He seems to spend too much time focused on movements in history where an underdog perservered, maybe too much time on this. The general premise that the identification of weaknesses in your giant can be a opening for your success is clear; however, the stories used to communicate this point I did not find helpful nor inspiring.
This is my first review and I have listened to many audible books. The stories of David, especially David and Goliath have been favorites of mine since I was a young boy. However, the author in my opinion fails to use illustrations and real life stories that I found to be helpful regarding the giants I face. No I may not listen to his work again.
It didn't realy spark any emotion, I found it disappointing.
Maybe the author should consider using stories that are more relavent to the day to day giants people face, or face at work, etc. There are only a few incredible people like Martin Luther King in this world, but many more of us who still have to battle giants on smaller issues than racism in America in the 1960s. For the first time, I stopped listening to a book, this book. Not what I expected at all.
Hacking my commute one audiobook at a time...
The stories of people with learning disabilities and how they overcame those difficulties to rise to the top of their chosen careers.
The bombing of London was very interesting.
Jay Freirich's story was very moving.
I sometimes wonder if the author thought about the concept first and then found a story to validate his line of thinking. Shouldn't it be the other way around ? i.e., Looking at stories and finding patterns. The stories are great but I cant help wondering.
The narration was okay. The subject material was anecdotal and not consistent with the theme.
As or I would have suggested the author make the stories more relevant to the subject matter.
I listen to a book a day just about. I am 49, I love mystery, thriller, true crime. G.Guidall best reader for me.
I am not sure what I expected, to be honest. I am please with this book and will listen to it again at some point. Some great examples in this book and does make you think or rethink on life issues.
The fact that Malcolm reads his own books, gives the listener a better understanding of his meaning and makes the books main points hit home.
All in Chapter 4: The Theory of Desirable Difficulty
I am a big fan of Malcolm Gladwell's work, but was immensely let down by this book. Approximately 50% of the book I had already read in various New Yorker articles and the like that Gladwell had written over about 10 years, and here he simply tried to jam them all together with a realistic interpretation of David and Goliath at the beginning to try and make them all gel. If you're new to Gladwell, certainly look to his earlier works like Blink, Tipping Point, and Outliers which all have interesting tidbits that you can apply to your life and business. This on the other hand didn't flow or form any ideas in my head that weren't of the most plain variety.
Well researched thrillers Chriton-esque. Nonfiction: Science, medical, biography, "self-help" meta cognitive sub-genre, memoir, philosophy..
Not a Gladwell title
His narration is excellent. I liked BLINK and THE TIPPING POINT. I have been listening to this now for a couple of hours and I think he has made one moderately interesting point he is beating it to death.
I think he can be a slow starting read. However, this book seems to be exceptionally slow going and without any dynamic tempo that would suggest it is going to get better. I am going to move on.
I'm just a simple man who is trying to be water.
I would. Gladwell always has a way of making you look at the seemingly obvious a little differently.
Perhaps, "Blink", in that Gladwell presents a different take on common occurences.
Not really character driven.
Not really. For me this wasn't his most power work. It's sort of like how M. Night Shamalawhateverhisnameis, blew you away with the sixth sense then has been trying to capture audiences in the same manner ever since. Gladwell has consistenly challenged me. This one was very good, but not his best. "Outliers" (continues to) hit me on several emotonal levels. IMO, his best work.
No. But looking foward to my next Gladwell read.
It started out ok and the idea of smaller classes not being the solution was interesting...but overall I thought the title was out of whack.
It was recommended by a friend who thought it was only ok but said anecdotally there were some interesting points. I agree. Except for a few very little remains in my memory which is not the sign of a great book or even entertaining one.