When I first saw this book I thought the author's name looked familiar then it came to me he is the Host of Hidden City on the Travel Channel. I was also familiar with the narrator Luke Daniels for his work in The Iron Druid Chronicles so I figured I would give this book a try. This is the 1st book in a planed Trilogy with the next book planed to come out 6 months after Marcus Sakey finishes it... pretty vague I know. The film rights were bought by Legendary Pictures, you might recognize them for the Dark Knight series, Watchman and Inception movies. So we will soon see this book turned into a feature film, which explains a lot about the style of writing and the depth of characters. If you have ever read Michael Crichton books you will understand what I am talking about. The book was written to be a movie so the book to movie adaption would go smoothly.
This story takes place in the same time period we currently live in but it follows an alternate time line. In this alternate time line there is an unexplainable increase in idiot savants, rather all the capabilities of savants without the downfalls. This group of people known as abnorms or twists are identified by the government and are forced to attend academy's as children where they are renamed and brainwashed. Any abnorms not controlled by the government are hunted down and killed by a government law enforcement agency that operates outside of the law, and with no regard to peoples civil liberty's under the pretense of protection. The main character Nick Cooper an agent tasked with hunting down abnorms begins to discover things aren't what they seem. We follow Cooper in his search for the truth.
The audio books I get tend to be either 1) scifi or 2) things for my husband and me to listen to on long road trips--humor or history
The sci-fi premise of the book seemed promising: suddenly and with no apparent cause, people start being born who are off-the-charts brilliant at an astonishing rate. Think of it like the "autism epidemic" only with geniuses. At a very young age, the geniuses are taken away from their parents and put in boarding schools where they are placed in competition with one another (reminiscent of Ender's Game). They are taught not to trust other brilliants and to bond only to their teachers, who are not brilliants. These are really interesting ideas.
Unfortunately, the story is encumbered with a one-dimensional protagonist. The main character--a "Brilliant" who has chosen to use his special talents as a sort of special ops guy who tracks down other brilliants for the government--has just one reaction to everything. His special talent is to be able to read people's body language and know just what they are going to do next. This gives him a great advantage in a fight. His backstory adds in the tidbit that he was bullied on the playground when he was a kid. And there you have this "fascinating" (NOT) character whose only reaction to any given situation is to want to fight, hit, push, crush, and otherwise physically assault people. He has this reaction constantly, whether the person he is talking to is a threat or not. If your only tool is a hammer . . .
Other characters seem like they were cut-and-pasted from a bad detective noir novel. The protagonist's side-kick detective is also heavy with the street fighter mentality. Even the women in the book have an aggressive, male vibe--one of them says something like "Whose ball sack do I have to hold in order to get a drink around here?" No one talks like that. The constant aggressive nature of the protagonist and the terrible dialog was so off-putting that I only listened to about 1-1/2 hours of this novel.
That's too bad, because I liked the narrator. Luke Daniels did an amazing job switching voices for each character. He was equally good at doing the male and the female characters.
yes. The story was interesting. I felt like a lot of the story was really obvious, and I was never really surprised by anything that happened.
Obvious ending, but it was fine.
No, This book was very slow at the beginning. It took me several tries to get into it.
This book is worth picking up if you like stories about superhuman abilities. I like the genre myself, which I think made an otherwise stale book worth finishing.
The reason i gave the story 3 stars...there is an academy for children in the book, the treatment of the children is evil and made me want to vomit, i was beyond disturbed to red hot anger.
On balance the book is good, other than the obvious i enjoyed it. Perhaps i'm a little over sensitive where child abuse is concerned and if you are like me in that prepare yourself or skip the book.
The book was great and didn't need the added drama of abuse to entertain or add to the drama. It was simply gratuitous, in my opinion.
Dr. Jim Fox -- Former College Professor and Mental Health Therapist
I love Sci-Fi, especially war type stuff. This book is based in the very near future, even the present. There was a deep seated "lesson". It hits you all the time which is a slight drawback. Nice story about love of kids and people in the middle of amazing near future story about loyalty and how to look at the truth.
I prefer mystery/thriller genre including YA with some non-fiction. I dislike and attempt to avoid novels that include the paranormal.
but then Brilliance becomes interesting. Overall the book is quite good. This is not your usual thriller; indeed, it is different concept from any other book I have read.
The narration is excellent.
Recommended with reservations due to the slow start and the excessive wordiness of the author in the first half of the book. I came very close to giving up, but am happy I did not.
Don't ask me why I hung on for so long. It took me until part 2 to even care what happened. Even then though, I just wanted to know what was going to happen because I had already invested so much time. Once I got to part 3 I was finally hooked. I needed to know what happened by then.
I wouldn't say the overall story was disappointing. It just took me a long time to get attached to the character. I guess I wanted more insight into who Nick Cooper really is.
It's hard to tell if it was the performance or the writing that was subpar. There were times that I couldn't tell what was actually happening and what was in Nick's head. I'm sure if I were reading it, it would be easier to make the distinction. So I guess I'd say the performance was a little dull.
I was satisfied with the ending so I wouldn't say that it wasn't worth my time to listen. But knowing what I know now I wouldn't waste a credit on it. I would wait for it to go on sale...maybe.
I know there is a sequel and I would like to know what happens but after my experience with this book I'm not sure if I'll make it a priority any time soon. It'll stay at the bottom of my list for now.
Science writer in America's heartland
It's my understanding that this book may be made into a movie. If so, it won't require much editing to turn it from a book into a script. The plot is predictable, as some other reviewers have said, but if it came out as an action movie, I would definitely go see it.
Obsessive book hoarder, and intense audible lover.
Probably not, but that doesn't mean I didn't enjoy it the first time around.
Not especially. I do love easy listeners once and a while but too much in one sitting and I find myself rolling my eyes and becoming irritated during certain trite instances.
I purchased this book during the daily deal special, where they brought them all back at the sale price. I did enjoy it. But not once did I feel the desire to see if there was a sequel. It was easy going in the sense that it was a rhythm I'm familiar with. Where characters predictably make right/wrong choices and the bad guys could be seen a mile away. I'm not saying don't listen to it, just be aware that you will know what's coming and the end is very predictable.
I have to write 15 words here but I can't think of an answer that isn't insulting to people who like this. But I've filled the 15 words now. So that's a good.
The protagonist's inability to think anything through and the lack of exploration of the sci fi concept the book introduces.
This is how the main character thinks things through: "Someone I love is potentially under threat? OK, I'm going to make that threat harder to deal with and ignore every warning sign I see. But it's because I feel really strong about this, so I don't have to think."
This problem is compounded by the fact the character is meant to be good at analysing characters and their future actions. That's his sci fi super power - predicting the future. The author had an out where initially it's just in specific situations but instead of using that to maybe say there were downsides to these skills/powers because you became too reliant on them, thus explaining his incredibly short term view of the world, the book stresses both that he can't turn the power off and then uses his power to figure it all out.
So he can't turn the power off, even, and he's only been given one small extra piece of information. And he figures out something he could have figured out if he'd ever simply considered a posibility. And his power is always on. So, in over a decade, and especially in the last ~4 years when he knew he had a bigger stake in the issue than just himself, he never with his unable to turn off power ever had a bit of a think.
He was also kind of a moral vacuum, even after his realisation of what was going on, still expressing a strong willingness to sacrifice millions for a small reprive for his family.
The other disappointment was the lack of exploration of the sci fi concept - that instead of idiot savants a bunch of regular savants are born. A fun concept. The further things we learn as the book develops - sometimes really strong savants can't function 'cause of a kind of sensory overload and none of the savants can turn their ability off. That's it. No other pitfalls. No unexpected applications of the abilities. Each ability is introduced early on, is quite simple and doesn't change.
At first I thought he was a bit cheesey sounding but that's just the American announcer voice that male American narrators seem to have. I got into it. He did voices for each character and really had a go.
Is it just me or is this a ridiculous question? But I have to get my 15 words in.Cutting Jar Jar Binks wouldn't have fixed the structural problems and characters in The Phantom Menace. Cutting any one character from this book wouldn't fix the problems with it.
This book had potential but it was squandered by making the main character a bit dim (while claiming he was a genius). For the first half of the book I was genuinely hoping the predictable thing wouldn't happen and instead he'd die and another character would take the lead. That hope was squashed the further I read and the predictable happened.
I hope, for the author's sake, he makes the character a bit brighter or better yet just follow a different person in the same world and has something up his sleeve for the abilities to develop for the sequel.
I won't be reading it, but I hope he does.It really is a fun concept. If you're the kind of person who can genuinely turn their brain off while reading this stuff probably wouldn't bother you.