Movie loving Brit living Down Under. Anything 'end of the world' themed usually gets my attention, but The Stand has yet to be beat.
An original idea.
It was just so formulaic and predictable. Narration was a bit too 'trailer voice-over guy' to give the story any impact, which didn't help, but the characters are just paper-thin. There's treachery, but you see it coming. All is not what it seems, but you see it coming. It's a story that's been done many times and usually better than it's done here.
He's a good narrator in that he's clear and his voices are fairly distinct from one another, but he just can't wind in the 'square jawed hero' voice. Like I said, often his narration sounds like an audition for trailer voice-over work; it was a time of warrrrr.
Nothing, I just didn't click with the story. Some people probably will.
At least I listened to the entire story, so it couldn't have been that bad.
I love mysteries. I've read all Agatha Christie's and Mary Higgins Clark's books. I'm on the hunt for more great books with female heroines.
I would change all the immature references to female body parts. It sounds like it was written by a frustrated sex-a-holic who never got the girls. The author womanizes in his writing to take his frustrations out on physically beautiful and confident women. It's a subliminal theme throughout his writing. And, I personally don't care for the narrator's "Keanu Reeves-like" voice. But, I've never liked KR or his voice in films. That type of voice sounds like someone who is trying too hard to sound "tough." Not working.
Womanizing, "poor me" victim-like whining of the lead character who, naturally, would only have an EX-wife. I'm sure that this story does have an audience...maybe people who've been only labeled as "smart" all their lives. They'll connect with the idea of gifted people being victimized by all those big bad mean (popular) bullies.
I've trailed away through most of it. I love mystery and suspense but the main topic's of no interest to me. I foolishly thought other listeners' reviews were on target. My "least" favorite sentence in the book is when the lead character is just sure of the physical description of a female receptionist on the other end of the phone. Wa?
Nope...shallow, immature writing style
You get what you pay for, listeners...fair warning. On the other hand, all you "brilliants" who disagree with everything I've said above will dig the book. Go for it!
I realize that this is not my kind of book - much action, not much character development, not much dialog. I like action and swift moving stories, but have to have a bit more than sequential acts to captivate my imagination.
The reason i gave the story 3 stars...there is an academy for children in the book, the treatment of the children is evil and made me want to vomit, i was beyond disturbed to red hot anger.
On balance the book is good, other than the obvious i enjoyed it. Perhaps i'm a little over sensitive where child abuse is concerned and if you are like me in that prepare yourself or skip the book.
The book was great and didn't need the added drama of abuse to entertain or add to the drama. It was simply gratuitous, in my opinion.
I have to write 15 words here but I can't think of an answer that isn't insulting to people who like this. But I've filled the 15 words now. So that's a good.
The protagonist's inability to think anything through and the lack of exploration of the sci fi concept the book introduces.
This is how the main character thinks things through: "Someone I love is potentially under threat? OK, I'm going to make that threat harder to deal with and ignore every warning sign I see. But it's because I feel really strong about this, so I don't have to think."
This problem is compounded by the fact the character is meant to be good at analysing characters and their future actions. That's his sci fi super power - predicting the future. The author had an out where initially it's just in specific situations but instead of using that to maybe say there were downsides to these skills/powers because you became too reliant on them, thus explaining his incredibly short term view of the world, the book stresses both that he can't turn the power off and then uses his power to figure it all out.
So he can't turn the power off, even, and he's only been given one small extra piece of information. And he figures out something he could have figured out if he'd ever simply considered a posibility. And his power is always on. So, in over a decade, and especially in the last ~4 years when he knew he had a bigger stake in the issue than just himself, he never with his unable to turn off power ever had a bit of a think.
He was also kind of a moral vacuum, even after his realisation of what was going on, still expressing a strong willingness to sacrifice millions for a small reprive for his family.
The other disappointment was the lack of exploration of the sci fi concept - that instead of idiot savants a bunch of regular savants are born. A fun concept. The further things we learn as the book develops - sometimes really strong savants can't function 'cause of a kind of sensory overload and none of the savants can turn their ability off. That's it. No other pitfalls. No unexpected applications of the abilities. Each ability is introduced early on, is quite simple and doesn't change.
At first I thought he was a bit cheesey sounding but that's just the American announcer voice that male American narrators seem to have. I got into it. He did voices for each character and really had a go.
Is it just me or is this a ridiculous question? But I have to get my 15 words in.Cutting Jar Jar Binks wouldn't have fixed the structural problems and characters in The Phantom Menace. Cutting any one character from this book wouldn't fix the problems with it.
This book had potential but it was squandered by making the main character a bit dim (while claiming he was a genius). For the first half of the book I was genuinely hoping the predictable thing wouldn't happen and instead he'd die and another character would take the lead. That hope was squashed the further I read and the predictable happened.
I hope, for the author's sake, he makes the character a bit brighter or better yet just follow a different person in the same world and has something up his sleeve for the abilities to develop for the sequel.
I won't be reading it, but I hope he does.It really is a fun concept. If you're the kind of person who can genuinely turn their brain off while reading this stuff probably wouldn't bother you.
Sounded like just the thing I like, but irritating instead.
Narrator was fine
Mental child abuse
a real disappointment
My favorite quote. When we have "the talk" with our daughter we are going to tell her that sex is between one a man and an woman in love unless one of those is a rich twist then I will tell her to remember best effort... (I garbled the quote but I laughted out loud)
It was like X-Men. A few exceptional people begin to arise. Us VS Them always stands out....
This was a good story and a good read. I would have liked to give it four stars.
But the author doesn't trust the reader to get the point. He hits the reader over the head with it, over and over again. It's like the Holocaust (boink!). It's like making the Jews wear a yellow star (boink!). It's like the WWII Japanese internment camps (boink!). It's like racism (boink!). It's like homophobia (boink!). And then I read an article he wrote and he also says it's about autism.
By doing this, he disrespects the reader and adds a falseness to the story. He's not black. He's not gay. He's not Japanese. He's not autistic. (I don't know if he's Jewish, but even if he is, he grew up in America and never had to wear a yellow star!)
It's always risky to tell a story not your own. But, hey, that's what fiction is. But then just tell the story and trust the reader to make her or his own connections and comparisons.
The narrator was okay, but not my favorite. He only had one alternate voice other than Cooper's and it was rather annoying.
I don't like making comparison between books. However, I couldn't help but think of X-Men through most of the first half of this book. The Brilliants/abnorms are like the mutants; they were born with amazing gifts like an idiot savant but without the mental handicap. A man sensing patterns in the stock market makes billions, a little girl can read body language and know when someone is lying, and a woman can see the vectors of where people are looking and walking so she can walk through crowds without being noticed. The normal people fear that the abnorms will gain power over the normals. There are people on both sides stirring up talks about a war. If you're not familiar with the X-Men, then it won't be a distraction. Other than that, it's a terrific book - full of suspense, twists, and turns.
Once I started listening, I couldn't stop - totally pulled me into the story. I can see this book being made into a movie! The narrator spoke a little too fast at times, but otherwise was fine. Totally enjoyed listening to this one!