This book made me laugh uncontrolably while among strangers in a crowded room. That means it's good.
While it was written many years ago, it's still very well suited to the modern reader. It is funny and pretends to take itself too seriously while doing totally the opposite. The main character is actually quite likable, unlike Arthur Dent, whose suffering you actually enjoy.
Hodgeman knows humor. Something in the way he combines serious and flippant nails it.
I laughed out loud several times, causing people to stare. I'm normally pretty reserved.
Sci-Fi & Fantasy Reader
I picked this up when I had some cash on my account that was about to expire. It caught my attention, because it was one of the Neil Gaiman Presents selections. I really like Gaiman’s work and I figured I would probably also like a book that he recommends. I was right.
Dimension of Miracles was amusing, witty, and well-written. In many ways, it was like Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, only it came first. It begins when Tom Carmody is whisked away from his New York apartment upon accidentally winning the galactic lottery. In his exploits thereafter, he meets a number of strange characters on several interesting worlds as he attempts to return to Earth.
My favorite part was probably when Tom was transported to Earth during the dinosaur age and proceeds to have a very charming conversation with a Tyrannosaurus Rex.
John Hodgman was an excellent choice to narrate this novel. I thought his tone perfectly embodied the author’s dry wit.
Overall, the novel was quite enjoyable. The story was light and amusing, but still had some deeper points as well. It won’t go down as my all-time favorite, but it was still a fun read that I would recommend to anyone looking for a comedic sci-fi story.
this is very much a pre-Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy novel. it has much in the way of the odd ball events and satiric jabs at society etc. that pop up in Adam's work. while i found it very much like HGG and enjoyed it, i did find myself wishing for a little more of the manic Adams movement and wordplay etc. Hodgman is passable as a narrator but could have read with a little more gusto. still all in all good and i do like the ending but a couple scenarios perhaps go on a bit too long. can't give it more stars simply because it is done better by Adams.
I value intelligent stories with characters I can relate to. I can appreciate good prose, but a captivating plot is way more important.
This felt like a less-funny, more American Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It was very interesting at times, very dated at times, and not quite funny enough most of the time.
Hodgman was well-paired as a narrator, and he did as much with it as he could.
It was presented as Douglas Adams like humour, but it ended up being just very very preachy. Really really long sections of the author pontificating on their view of the world with very little humor or wit. Parts of it read more like a manifesto then a story
Very good, very funny, a bit more subtle than Hitchhikers guide. However, to get some of the jokes I think you have to have lived through the 60s. Most of the book can be fully understood by modern readers, but some of the jokes are starting to age.
I really wanted to enjoy this book because it was recommended by Neil Gainman an author I truly enjoy but I just could't get into it.
No one really.
I didn't even finish it.
I don't think I'd try Sheckley again. Hodgeman was great in Year Zero.
I kept waiting for it to get funny but it just kept dragging on. It just wasn't my brand of funny.
I love an intelligent book -- but when it's very clever as well, I'm all in! The whole of this book, extremely well read by Hodgman by the way, is a marvelous metaphor for how we view the universe, earth, religion, ourselves...well, you just have to listen. This is one of the very few books I'll listen to again and again; there's just so much rich content. Sheckley is truly a genius.
No, not certain that i will, this has put me off.
I came to this next after Ready player one and Outlander, expecting high things. It just doesn't work for me, its painful, and a drag to get through.
I'm not familiar with John other than he is a PC advert, so perhaps I dont have an ear for his work.
It was short, thank goodness.
I like HHGTTG, and hard sci Fi, Heinlein, Asimov etc, this just didn't kick off at all for me, sorry.