Notably Steven King wrote an early novel 'Rage' that was found to be on the personal reading list of two American Shooters.
The overall pull no punches attitude / writing style of Steven King is read well by Christian Rummel. Overall the points made are hard set in American culture, which I find disturbing to think about. He argues that there is no culture of violence in the media, which he backs up with popular media examples (video/written most strongly). But King ignores a couple of elements: 1) the American polarized psyche 2) the facts about anti psychotic drugs involved in the shooter incidents. I live just across the border. And when all is said and done, gun crime in Canada, even in the largest metro areas is very low compared to the US. The reason, guns are hard to get. There are a lot of things I don't like about Canada, the liberal attitudes, the lack of government accountability, the stuffy attitudes, the limited press, and these may under foreign lens seem juxtaposed to the gun control laws, but facts are facts the gun crime in Canada is minute in comparison to the gun crime in the US. I am not in favor of even changing the gun laws in the US, for the same reason as anyone there who isn't. It is a slippery slope. And as border nation I recognize the destabalizing potential of radical constitutional amendment. Over all this article was certainly worth the few cents it cost.
Not a mainstream reader.
For anyone that knows me, they know that Stephen King is my favorite writer and I've read all of his books, but "Guns" is just another rant from a celebrity. There is no breakthrough new ideas on the gun issue that other pundits voice their opinion before. Just because it's Stephen King, this essay is getting good reviews. It's too bad that Audible is trying to make a buck out of 49 minutes from one author opinion on guns. Audible could had given this one away, but they didn't, even though its an Audible, Inc. production. Shame on Audible.
The truth with facts would have made this book better.
Been honest and factual and not misleading.
Narrator was decent.
There was nothing good about this book but the narrator.
The book is written by another famous person who has limited knowledge about what he is talking about. He is misleading and not factual. He can not be this stupid so I'm assuming that he is misleading on purpose. He really needs to review what the second admendment is really about. Also he keeps saying the are trying to ban auto and semi auto guns. This not true at all. Automatic firearms have been banned since the mid 80's. Also he states that the teacher in her reference could have possible not been shot if the shooter would have had a 10 round magazine instead of a 30 round because it would have taken some time to reload, this is misleading. You can drop empty mag and pop new one in, in less than 3 seconds. He also speaks of how great Australia is since they have banned guns. What he forgets to tell you how violent crimes have dramatically risen. Also he states that these guns are not used to hunt. This also is not true. Seven of the 10 guys I hunt with use AR's to hunt with. You don't unload a full mag on a deer. I was very disappointed with his ingnorance because I do enjoy his books. Just another liberal agenda.
Hi, I work in I.T. and am a freelance photographer. Just love this site, and always happy to discuss books, photography or just plain life. Feel free to drop me a line, I'm always looking to meet interesting people.
Absoloutly, as an Australian I value our gun ownership laws, King has a balanced view.
The intelligent thoughtful commentry.
Its really more factual commentry.
No, I found it to intense for one session.
This is a well balanced and researched opinion.
I'm a voracious reader who unfortunately spends a lot of time on the road. Audiobooks make my life a lot better.
I'm not sure what my expectations were. I'm a huge second amendment supporter and certainly right of center politically and I agree with the sentiment that guns don't kill anyone at all. I also think that I've never seen a murder on TV (except I guess I did see Jack Ruby shoot Oswald, come to think of it). There are no murders on TV or in the movies, of course. All that said, I guess I expected a more reasoned approach from Stephen King. Some of his novels get a bit preachy (usually on the lefty side of the aisle) but never enough to bother me much, and I was actually surprised to hear he was a gun owner. His arguments are pretty familiar and lame, however. I am still and will always be a fan, however. As he said in the introduction, I'm one of those who thinks he should stick to writing books. In this essay, he's either preaching to the (gun-control) choir, or whatever the opposite metaphor would be (can't think of one offhand).
My title says it all. I really enjoy most of Steven King's books, but not this one. I thought I was listening to a pretty unbiased review up until about the last 10 minutes. I really disagree with the views and how they were presented at the end of this book. I have listened to every book I've purchased except this one, at 4 or 5 min left I just stopped listening.
University administrator. Commuter cyclist. Dad, husband. Loves books of course. Aspiring Jedi Knight and Warder.
I'm not American so I watch and listen to the gun debate with shifting emotions of anger, futility, hilarity, and lots of sadness. Like health care, like the deficit, the gun debate is a reflection of the fact the US is broken. Rome is on a slow burn when a man walks into a school and kills 20+ kids and teachers and no one so much as shrugs.
To his credit, King uses his literary skills and fame to put forward a most reasonable compromise on the gun question. It's not overly unique, but it does warrant attention for its moderation vs the usual celebrity extremism that gets picked up in the media. And having never read (or listened) to a King novel, I can say that I was impressed by the "everyman" style he used for his writing. He drops the occasional F-bomb and there is some humour but as you would expect from the king of horror and suspense, he tries to get your attention with some pretty graphic descriptions. Mission accomplished, he gets your attention.
For any American reading this book and this review and who has any kind of opinion on the gun question, I say this little essay is worth your money. King's middle of the road approach has appeal and has utility in a politic that by all accounts is presently not well. Those of us in Canada and the rest of the world (sans the psychos, Marxists, jihadists, and eco-crazies) are pulling for you. This book offers a moderate approach to guns just as there are reasonable approaches on whole host of other issues. I sincerely hope you folks begin to get it figured out.
The narrator, Rommell was his normal excellent self. The guy does outrage better than anyone.
I love how hard hitting this is. Great piece on guns and gun control.
The tone of his voice was appropriate for this piece.
Totally listen to it in one sitting. It has greater impact that way.
Strongly recommends every one reads Stephen King's essay 'Guns' good for both For and Against Gun control. Please give it a go.
Have a renewed interest in books after falling in love with audio books. I am listening to all different genres and exploring different authors.
I can only echo what someone else said. This is a balanced and reasonable approach on the topic of guns in the US. It is thought provoking.