I am undecided on this issue however I was disappointed with my favorite story teller's attempt to cobble together a cogent argument. For someone that can easily move between horror, fantasy, and baseball, his efforts fell short given his capabilities. Very disappointed.

No

Very enthusiastic

First chapter . . . Shakedown, had merits.

This was presented as an unbiased opinion on this issue. You pay to be yelled at, called names and abused by this author. I have many of his books in my library and absolutely love most of them. This is not an unbiased discussion.

Yes

Yes, the narrator did a very good job.

It did have a few good points before he started acting angry about people who disagree with his opinions.

Why does everyone that has access to the media feel they are an authority on politics. Is there anyone that can have a discussion or express their opinion without getting angry with people who do not share their view?

After reading King's memoir on writing, I thought I would give this a try and it was fantastic. What a bright, articulate man he is and so enjoyable to listen to.

Yes, brilliant writing as usual, very interesting arguments

Just an opinion that is measured and sensible and unbiased

Pleasant,easy,clear

I would have loved to hear Stephen King narrate this. Nothing at all to fault about Christian Rummel, but as a work of non fiction from Kings perspective, it sounded a bit odd with the wrong voice

A great little essay by Stephen King, good points about the turmoils of high school and the repercussions on our society.

I have to say that objectively, I enjoyed this short listen. And I do respect Stephen King as a fellow gun owner, but I disagree with his politics, as mentioned in the book. I did enjoy how he correctly portrayed the media as ratings-hungry and immorally uncaring.

yes

Fast pace and fast. Not a wasted word. You will cling to the narrators voice for a fast 45 minute ride.

Stephen King seems one of the first people to simply bring this contemporary issue under the light of logic. It is amazing how most people (attmitingly myself included) hang on or have hung on to at least one incorrect assumptions on this debate. Assumptions that have been spoon fed to us by the media, special interest and politicians on self serving missions that happen to be at odds with fixing the problems.

Mr. King throws abucket of water on this issue in a cool, down to earth prose that show how political polarity and otherwise immature childishness has made BOTH SIDES of the arguement hopelessly divided. How thier lack of accountability and misconceptions have lead to lofty goals that are all but inachievable even with full compromise from the other side.

Absoloutly, as an Australian I value our gun ownership laws, King has a balanced view.

The intelligent thoughtful commentry.

Its really more factual commentry.

No, I found it to intense for one session.

This is a well balanced and researched opinion.

I found this essay very well constructed. I live in Sandy Hook so this issue is quite close to my heart. In my opinion Mr. King presents an excellent narrative of how all sides approach this issue and then outlines a "realistic" view of how and why compromises and changes to the law should occur.

I appriciated this well balanced essay on gun control. Open discussion without hysteria is what this country needs and this is a good place to start.