As expected from Stuart Neville, this is a good, solidly crafted story that quickly captures the imagination with a morally complex mystery set in 1963 Ireland. The title "Ratlines" refers to a system of escape routes through Europe utilized by Nazis after the end of WWII. Having never heard the term before, I was surprised when a quick internet search revealed that the novel's villain, Otto Skorzeny, was not only a real historical figure, but the very Nazi who masterminded the "Odessa File" underground railroad for fleeing fascists. As Neville expertly builds a multi-layered foundation for his story, much is explained about Ireland's role in WWII. A large portion of the Irish population seemed to believe the old chestnut, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." Unfortunately, Ireland's neutrality and some citizen's quiet support of Hitler's war with Britain brought the country to the slippery slope that is the background of "Ratlines."
Some reviewers have taken exception to Alan Smyth's narration of this book. While I see that Neville's previous titles are in my Audible library, I must not be as passionate about their narrator, the truly excellent Gerard Doyle. I thought Smyth's Irish accent pleasant and understated. A testament to Smyth's versatility is his ability to handle the narrative cocktail of several different European accents (so many old Nazis popping up!) with a South African and American chaser. He disappeared into the story and that's my definition of great narration.
Finally, I feel compelled to tell you that several scenes in this book are quite graphic in their description of torturous interrogation. I mean quite graphic. I mean, I pulled my earphones out for awhile, then listened again for a sec, then pulled them out for another while. To the author's credit, the scenes are so chillingly real, the dread experienced by the characters was easily grasped, giving further understanding of how fear drove their actions - and inactions.
Don't know what I want to be when I grow up. Trip's cool though. Use Audible to make gym-training sane... And rip my imagination.
Maybe the loss of Gerard Doyle's authentic voice mortally wounded this novel? Alan Smyth simply lacks the tongue for these characters. No, that's a necessary but not the essential reason that Ratlines is ratty. Neville asks us to accept too much of his protagonist's body and character. Albert Ryan, the lead character is a serial shark jumper. Imagine two solid days of gruesome torture, then imagine with virtually no rest voluntarily lifting huge chests, after a demanding sea voyage ?! Neville is almost contemptuous of his fans in this one as he rolls out a string of characters each with the depth of parking lot puddles. I have reeeeely enjoyed Neville until now. Perhaps I'll try another if Gerard Doyle creates his characters for me. Perhaps, I'm really disappointed wit Ratlines.
Lover of good cops and robbers books, Anne Tyler, Robert Parker, Dennis Lehane, James Lee Burke.
I love Neville's trilogy and they are a few of the not many books I've listened to over and over. Gerard Doyle is terrific as their narrator. I'm still on part one of this novel and have had to backtrack several times because the narration is so boring and strange. Weird accents come and go with the main character sounding American and bad Irish depending on a whim. It's just too distracting. I'm debating buying the kindle version. The story seems interesting but I just can't stay interested due to Mr. Smyth's reading of it.
I'd recommend reading this one.
Some people have commented on the narration and if you listend to, and liked Nevill's earlyer books narrated by Gerrard Doyle you should listen to the sample and see how you like Smyth's narration and it would not have been fitting to have Doyle narrating this one, it is not a part of the Jack Lennon series.
The story is gripping and I recommend it for all Neville fans
Narrative makes the world go round.
To second reviewer Deborah: if you find Gerard Doyle's standard of narration essential for an excellent listen, consider getting this in print. Smyth is very competent and although I'd listen to him in other novels, he is not a match for a Neville Ireland-set tale. This maybe good news for listeners not fond of Irish inflected vowels, however.
Apart from the narration, I think this is as a good a novel (plot, character, setting, atmosphere) as Ghosts of Belfast - even richer because it is excellent historical as well as crime fiction. Grounded in the larger lines of history but with fictional details, it captures the moral complexity of real life. Neville avoids creating black hats/ white hats compared to much best selling historical fiction.
There are, however, as in real life, generous doses of torture, beatings and murder.
I enjoy detective and historical fiction but try to stay away from the violent stuff out of fear of becoming desensitized to violence -- but, I think by staying "real" -- by avoiding glamorizing adventure and espionage, this Neville novel doesn't make violence entertainment for entertainment's sake. I found the violence "wince factor" higher in this Neville, however - and that may be due to my narration preference.
Including the JFK angle in the storyline might appeal to a larger audience than earlier Neville -- thus the choice of the more standard General English narration I guess -- that choice has debatable merit. Without Doyle's narration, I doubt I would have found even Ghosts of Belfast so engaging. He was able to expand on author Neville's nuances of class, sectarian and generational differences beyond the printed word. I spent as much time wondering what a different narrator could bring to Ratlines as I did thinking about the moral complexities raised by Neville, and that is unfortunate. Narrators matter, especially in an assembly of characters such as this.
I have only read Lost Souls but I was expecting the same high quality narration, character building and plotting skills. This book has a fascinating topic, Nazi's harbored in Ireland after WWII, but the predicable yet confusing plot could have been placed in any thriller setting. We never got to know any of the characters so they stayed flat and the book hung itself on the story, which had many twists (good IMO) but little intrigue. I will keep trying Neville however.
Why oh why did the publishers move away from Gerard Doyle as a narrator for Stuart Neville's books? I actually returned this one because I couldn't bear to hear Alan Smyth read one more word of Stuart Neville's fine writing. Forced character voices and a wretched habit of hitting sentences with false emphases and exaggerated emoting which made it sound like it was being read by an adolescent. Narrators like Gerard Doyle, Michael Kitchen and Anton Lesser elevate and enhance the experience without distorting the tone of a novel. I wish publishers (or whoever chooses the narrators) would take more care.
Hard to follow. Good reader.
Not about WWII or much about Ireland.
No! One bad , confusing book should not be followed by another.
Unless you can't sleep, pass on this one.
If they were interested in WW2 fiction. It's worth a free credit.
Decent plot twists.
Tries too hard.
I actually could, but have no idea who would be main characters.
It wasn't bad. If you're thinking about getting it you should. It's worth the credit and your time to listen. I realize its a difficult job but the narrator could have done better and takes some getting used to.
Doubtful. It's not one of my favorite Stuart Neville stories.
Once I realized it was more of a James Bondian spy story rather than typical Neville noir, it was a fun story
I couldn't recreate James Nesbitt's voice in my head if I wanted to. I wouldn't have thought of a George Clooney voice for the American. I was surprised to learn Alan Smyth wasn't an Irish-American because his narrating voice sounded very American with little hints of Irish heritage coming through.
I hope if they make a movie out of it, Julia Robert isn't cast as the love interest.