A self-absorbed Spanish lawyer finds himself in a world filled with zombies.
This is presented as if read from a journal. Give me a break. Journal entries are terse comments describing a situation not elaborate flowing verbose prose.
Every possible cliche is used. Cars won’t start till the last moment; the climb down the rope will result in a fall hurting an ankle; an entry into a house will invariably be too noisy alerting the zombies… How many guys would spend time and precious paper writing in a journal that they can’t use a pistol, that they fear shooting themselves in the foot, and worrying if they will be able to shoot a zombie in the first place?
Every action has to be second guessed agonized. Man up buddy! Stop the hand-wringing. You are in a zombie novel. Act accordingly.
Good time passer.....Very overly decriptive story telling. Way to much "fill" about the scene or situation.
I hope not
I think the narrator did a wonderful job with this book. I really enjoyed listening to him and his different takes on the characters. I enjoyed his style enough that I may look for more books he does as well.
This was a great tale of a person trying to survive a zombie apocalypse. The problems that he runs into along the way make things very difficult in an already difficult world. The book is basically about a man that decides to try and survive the plague that has hit the world hard and he has try to avoid the infected while finding supplies and searching for other survivors.
I only have 1 complaint with the book and its why it lost a full star from me. There was way to much descriptions of everything in this book. I honestly think this book could have been an hour or more shorter without all those excessive descriptions. Every zombie encounter was way over described for me. I really didnt need to know the description of every single zombie they encountered as it seemed to drag each encounter on and on and on. I get that the author was trying to give you the feel of the terror our adventurer was seeing but it was just to much for me.
Plot often felt contrived.
Too much cat.
I really like end of the world stuff, so probably.
I wanted this book to be good. The basic concept was solid; a 30 year old lawyer finds himself one of the few survivors of a zombie apocalypse. The author does a good job of explaining how the event occurred and he does this through the eyes of the narrarator, but that is where all the good things end. There are so many instances where the plot is completely predictable and the author goes out of his way to kill any suspense he may have built. He starts out several chapters with the narrarator telling you he is ok now, or he is a captive, or that he is exhausted but safe, and then the story reverts to the past tense and we learn the events that led up to the current situation. There is no suspense if you know the hero is going to be safe and ok. Worse, the hero does stuff that would have you screaming at the screen if this was a movie. A suicidal mother kills herself with a shotgun. Does the hero take the gun to replace the one he lost. No, it's never mentioned again. The hero puts down his weapons and loses track of them while he loots a store with zombies handing around outside. Never gonna happen to a person with half a brain. The whole story is full of What??? moments like this and it takes away from the story. The first person narrative is full of whiny opinions and excessive hyperbole used to describe even mundane events. You are left saying, this guy is so stupid and he deserves to be a zombie victim. That's how I feel about the whole story. The narration was adequately done, though the narrarator does have a very young sounding voice. I think that is part of what makes the whole book sound like it was written for the 14 year old market.