Nassim Nicholas Taleb has an abrasive personality which comes through very strongly in his writing. A lot of people will be turned off by that, but if you can get past that and really listen to his ideas you will be rewarded with well though out ideas that are presented in an easy to understand way. His books should not be considered light reading, you will need to spend time thinking about them to digest the ideas! I love his books and look forward to each new one. You may not agree with everything he says but his books will get your juices flowing and get you thinking. What more can you ask for from a book?
Yes, I need too.
The Drunkards Walk
Black Swan (of course)
I must have. They all read better than I do.
His overall strength of purpose and his wellingness to tell some "want to bees" to kiss off was good for him .
Listen and observe.
I might listen to some parts that I want to 'go over' again. Most of the book is relative easy but some ideas worth a second visit.
The black swan is similar in the way of telling the ideas using stories.
Fat Tony from Brooklyn.
The definition of Anti-fragility and consideration of this new concept in a wide range of contexts.
The logical definition of a vastly under-appreciated concept followed by persuasive examples of the many contexts in which it apples, including human physiology, biology more broadly, investment decisions, and macro-economics.
Robustness is not the opposite of fragility.
Almost impossible to apply the author's findings to a practical application.
Total waste of my money!
I love Taleb’s idea of Antifragile. Embrace systems that will thrive in random events which would damage fragile ones. Taleb is clearly well educated in a variety subjects; I love his talent for finding the patterns of ideas shared by mythology, business, architecture, biology, mathematics, etc. I also enjoyed learning some new $50 words (e.g. “iatrogenics”).
However, I am giving the Story a score of two because Taleb’s cool idea does not overcome his desperate need for an Editor … and if he had an Editor for this one, then he should have taken that Editor’s advice. This book is a train wreck of engaging ideas tangled in a run-on sentence of satirical, back-handed shots at his critics (i.e. “so called experts”). An Editor could help him distill out his great ideas and insights from this chaff of insults that he should save for his blog.
I am giving the narrator Joe Ochman five stars for his Performance. He did an amazing job of capturing Taleb’s insulting, sometimes whiny, and slightly arrogant tone that flavored the text … at least the first half (I couldn’t take it anymore and gave up in the second part of the book).
Taleb makes same argument over and over again. except this time he is more impressed with himself.
I have been a member for years. Out of all my reads this just floored me. I am not a sophisticated guy and if your aren't either you will love this Book.
I responded favorably to the decision not to bore general readers with the technical details of making statistical infrences about relationships when the underlying distributions are not assumed to be typical "normal" distributions. I would have liked to have seen more treatment of so-called cascade failure events and what engineering has come up with in their preventative strategies, but I suspect that is more about me than the book.
I appreciated the breadth of issues the author brought to bear.
I'm going to need to listen to this book again to get the full benefits it may have to offer. I went through it the first time too fast, and I did not spend time looking at the .PDF file containing graphics which was made available in support of the text. The next time through I'm going to give the technical issues a much closer "read."
I agree with other reviewers that at times the author spends a little too much energy boosting his own ego, either consciously, or more likely simply as an unconscious manifestation of his life experiences and the battles he alluded to in his career. I may even take the time to dig up some of the more collaborative scholarly papers referenced in this book and track down related research in my field of social organization which focuses on organizational design and organizational structures.
I'm willing to allow the possibility that some life-altering truth might be contained in Mr. Taleb's latest. But I'll never get to it -- at 50 minutes in, I'm throwing in the towel. In a book such as this, within an hour one might hope for some concrete discussion of the author's thesis. What we get here is little more than a screed, a polemic against academics, most of business, government -- actually, pretty much everybody except for Mr. Taleb. We're forced to endure a never-ending stream of straw man arguments and ad hominem attacks, delivered with a ceaseless contempt that is wearying -- and a bit disturbing. On this point, Mr. Ochman shines -- the author's contempt and anger are unflinchingly delivered.
The thesis that emerges -- to the extent it is allowed to -- seems to be that complex systems behave in unpredictable ways, and that efforts to micromanage said systems will inevitably, over time, produce massive failures. Conversely, left to their own devices, unfettered by the hands of bureaucrats, such dynamic systems will prove successful. Oh, and fragile things tend to be, well, fragile.
Who do I see about getting my credit back?