I will listen to this again just to re-capture the feeling the author explained about his experience.
I liked it when he could explain away the other surgeon's reasons for what happened to him.
I liked his description of going in and out of different levels of heaven.
Gave me goose bumps and of course cried at different parts.
Was nice that it was read by the author for effect, but thought there could have been a little more emotion in the reading.
Another in the list of there really IS something beyond death...noteworthy because of the author's education and experience in dealing with the transition from life to after-life.
Believers will be comforted, non-believers will seek to discredit the author's account and/or experience and conclusions. A gentle listen on a fascinating subject.
Absolutely; in fact I have recommended it to at least 50 people.
All of Dr. Weiss's books and to many of
I have not listened to any of his other works.
Now We Kmow!
Dr. Alexander has been given a formidible task to accomplish and he is doing it beautifully. I am very grateful.
Refreshing scientific viewpoint.
I actually appreciated that it wasn't a "performance." It was a reading of the book, by the author (a Doctor), with expected normal emotion (minor welling up in the voice a couple of times). It was so very credible from his point of view, let alone from his experience.I'm an engineer. I appreciate truth and facts. I dismiss most accounts of improbable events the moment I sense either some author-motivated personal gain or simpler explanation. Neither were present in this account - in fact, just the opposite. I wanted the clearest, most objective, most accountable peek into what we cannot measure (without actually experiencing it myself). For me, this is it, in spades.
Life, Part 2.
Tell us about yourself!
Thought I would enjoy and kept trying to get into the book - but found the main character unrelatable.
This book is purported to add to the discussion of near death experiences because the author is a scientist. However, the entire story hinges on the authors assertion that his "neocortex was shutdown" and thus he would have been incapable of experiencing an NDE within his own brain. A real scientist would have acknowledged that the entire NDE could have happened before or after this "shutdown". A real scientist also would have enthusiastically considered the possibility that the current body of knowledge regarding the neocortex is sorely lacking. A real scientist would have used his new found skepticism to formulate some hypotheses and conduct some experiments.Adding insult to serious injury, the author wants us all to believe that he was given the answers to the universe during his NDE, but that it might take a while for him to be able to explain it all to us -- presumably in a followup book that he will write after Oprah tells him how the universe really works (see his website for a photo to with Oprah and links to her various minions).I read most stories about NDEs with a mixture of skepticism and intrigue. This book, however, is different. While I do not doubt the authors illness and NDE, I do doubt his honesty and integrity. This book seems to be little more than a launching pad for a new career as a self-proclaimed prophet and purveyor of junk science.
Been honest about the science.
Less narcissistic rambling and more science.
Story reads like a boring clinical history. Argument unconvincing. If you are agnostic there is too much "God" stuff.
He tries but affect is very flat
I am a grower. A tangle of vines weaving round myrtle branch fences. Rusty metal, soft stone, and worn wood. Unkempt curls and knees covered in clay. I listen.
This is one of the best audiobooks I've listened to recently. I love that it is narrated by the author. You get a different level of authenticity and emotion behind the reading. Especially given the subject matter.
The author is a man of science a neurosurgeon. This out of body near death experience that put his world views into question. I think that this the most compelling part of the book. Hearing a hardcore scientist talk about the realms of the spiritual based on personal experience.
The description of the actual near death experience.
Yes. I think I listened to this book all at once on a cleaning day. I didn't want to turn it off. I wanted to know the whole story and the out come. I had goose bumps at times and at other times I was nearly brought to tears.
I just want to say that this book although it is about a spiritual topic it is definitely not preachy or pushing one religious belief. It is more about one man's near death experience that pushed the limits of what he previously believed to be true. A man of science pushed past the limits of what science can explain. A really powerful and amazing story.
Do you read the book before you dislike my reviews?
I can't help being a little skeptical of Eben Alexander's near death experience, but unlike other books in this religious genre that I've read, I believe him. Instead of quoting off Bible verses to tell his story, the author uses his professional medical background and science to backup what he experienced when he was in a coma and how he woke up because of his love for his son. He didn't see a light at the end of the tunnel or angel of death showing him to the gateway to heaven, but he saw a need to live again.
I have to admit that I'm the wrong person to write this review because I think that heaven is whatever your subconscious mind wants it to be. Many authors in this genre tries too hard to preach to us that heaven is real and we should all worship God. I'm not doubting them, but it is nice to hear from someone who wasn't as active in their religion before they had their near death experience.
"Proof of Heaven" was written in a way that you want to believe there is an afterlife, but without the agenda of going to church and being brain wash over and over that there is a god. If you belief system is strong, you already know base on your personal judgement that your religion is true to your heart and don't need convincing to act upon it. Instead of focusing on just one religion to explain Alexander's story, he made religion as an after thought and that is why it is so believable.