And Stephen King and Joe Hill deliver. Once again King preys on our common fears--fears that keep us awake at night and give us pause in the daylight--to scare the living hell out of us. It's a perfect story for October. It's short, terrifying, horrifying and disgusting; and Stephen Lang's audio performance translates all the terror, horror and disgust beautifully.
The narration was superb. I loved listening to it!
I will because the writing was in King's style, which I love, but I will be dubious because I felt the storyline was weak.
Loved it! I am looking for more of his narrations!
The beginning (as everything that King does) grabs you and pulls you into the story. He is the master at that.
I loved the narration and the hook, I just wish it had been a better story but that's just one person's opinion.
I guess I'm a baby...I just love to be read to.
Stephen King is so good at the short story and this is no exception. I had a short road trip and I literally timed it perfectly so the book was ending just as I was pulling into the driveway of my family's summer home....kind of spooky. Love it.
I listened to In the Tall Grass twice! Just had to make sure I really was hearing what I thought I was hearing.
The turn of events are horrifying! From beggining to end this story grabs your attention and quickly turns your insides out when all hell breaks loose In the Tall Grass!
The narrator does a fantastic job in telling this story. Nothing boring about it.
This book didn't make me laugh or cry, but it did make my jaw drop so far south I had to pick it up with a shovel. I'm also pretty sure my eyes got as big as dinner plates had I had the chance to observe my own reaction in front of a mirror. Watch your jaw. Yours just might drop too!
No money wasted here. This is a short story that can be listened to in less than 2 hours. It's a short ride, but oh boy, is it a ride!
Studying to be a Mechanical Engineer at Georgia Institute of Technology.
I like this story a lot more than than A Face in a Crowd, which was at least a little confusing and at most not one of Kings best works.
This on the other hand is one of Kings best short stories. I love the flow from one point to the other, the style, insanity, and absurdness of it all. Its terrifying and unnerving.
Its so damn creative and well done. It brings reality into a the realm of the supernatural, which King does greatly in all of his works, but this one best of all.
I'm curious as to who is the real driving force here, King or his son Hill? It definitely has King's style, but if this is any hint at Hill;s style, I look forward to his future releases.
The narration is great to. The performance is great, but a good narration isn't just about how well one performance but also on how well received their voice is. This narrator has a very pleasant voice and fits very well into the story.
Lang's narration combined with King and Hill's wonderful writing really brought the story to life. More than a few times, I found my self laughing out load, amazed at how real the terror was.
This could really progress into an excellent novel, but that isn't to say it isn't the perfect length, because as much as I want more of it, I'd be lying if I didn't admit that making it a short story is part of what makes it so damn good.
I'm a big fan of SF/F/Horror, and all things in between and out.
This King/Hill collaboration provides a disturbing little tale of a brother and sister on a cross-country trip, who wade out into the tall grass when they hear a child calling for help. I listened to the excellent Matheson homage “Throttle” that King and Hill collaborated on, so in my mind, the bar for this one was set pretty high. This one feels like an old-school Stephen King horror to me – it’s disturbing and gross and without a question horror. Unfortunately, it didn’t seem to go much further than what was on the surface as King's (or Hill's) work has in the past, and so when it ended, despite getting a decent dose of horror, I felt a little unsatisfied.
Stephen Lang’s narration is solid, of course.
In the end, I’m not exactly disappointed I bought and listened to it, but I have a hard time imagining I’ll return to it again.
Yes. The direction and the actors' execution achieved something far greater than what I could have interpreted through my imagination.
My favorite scene was when the husband first meets the black rock. And I think that this scene really showed the synergies between the this once in a generation opportunity for a father-and-son team comprised of two of the greatest living horror writers to use their obvious like-mindedness to create something really wonderful. And I hope they continue to write together. Stephen King does a masterful job creating characters who find themselves in a supernatural situation. The set up is always superb. But when it comes to the down and dirty manifestation of the supernatural, his stories are usually quite ethereal on the subject. Bag of Bones was awesome, but the depiction of what the supernatural creatures were was actually quite murky.Joe Hill does an excellent job painting a practical depiction of normal (an not so normal) people who find themselves in supernatural situations. 20th Century Ghosts is one of the best books of short horror precisely because Mr. Hill's characters react with such a frank honesty to truly weird situations that have very little predicate explanation.This story was the perfect merger of the "edge of your seat" set up that Stephen King is famous for, followed by a supernatural climax that addressed all of the very practical aspects of their situation, and in a way that the reader can really identify not only with the characters, but through their actions, understand the supernatural force they encounter.
What a disappointment. Pointless. I was irritated the entire time I was listening...I kept waiting for something to happen, for something to matter. I love Stephen King, but this was awful.
I honestly don't know who it would be for. It wasn't written well and it was just gross to be gross, in my opinion.
I like Joe Hill and don't like Stephen King. So, maybe taking Stephen King out of the equation would've been the best way to go.
Sure, I had no problem with the narration.
I had two theories on why I didn't like this short story. The first was that Stephen King's presence damaged any redeeming qualities. The second was that it was Joe Hill's first attempt at a story. The latter isn't true, since it was published in 2012 and Hill had books published in '07 and '10. Obviously, it could be anything and many things can go wrong in the writing process. I would consider this short story garbage and, even though it's only around $7, I think I was ripped off.
This was a great "edge of your seat" story, that keeps you thinking about it long after you've read it. The narrator does a great job of keeping the suspense high.
I enjoyed it and would recommend it.