Maybe in England
He was fine, it was the story.
Do you also want to know my shoe size? Give up already. I'm not an editor and I just didn't enjoy the book
This book has not just a main character it has many many main characters, it gets confusing following. After finishing the book I am relistening to it, because I know I missed something. There is no real clear plot. There is a great deal of details on all the characters in the book, but who is the main character? Not sure if it would have been better with a different narrator.
No! I was very disappointed and quit listening after Chapter 20. Too much foul language and had difficulty following the story line . It is not necessary for a book to contain a majority of words that begin with "F" to make a good "adult" book.
Yes, as I totally loved Harry and will hope she begins to reflect some of what made Harry so good in future books.
Don't even remember the character of Tom Hollander.
Yes, the story has many threads and plot lines, so given my poor attention span, it deserves a couple of listens to get every nuance straight
Hard to compare. It is a kind of social history story with a believable cast of modern day characters with modern day problems. I do not want to denigrate either story, bIts a bit like the Archers on steroids,
The social worker who came down from London on a promise. Seems like a genuinely decent person having a series of bad breaks.
This is not a pleasant story, the good guys end up really badly, but that is life. Strong language and uncomfortable situations, but there is no gratuitous violence, sex or language, people really do speak and act like this.
Sentient Being, Planet Earth
The narrative is excellent. The Reading was wonderful. The story went no where and it was "Predictable". I imagine it's unfair to JK as so much is now expected of her. I'd skip this read.
Cannot imagine who would enjoy this.
The story line; it did not peek my interest... depressing...
voices & inflection
Scratch it and start over...
I would not have given this book a second look if not for the fame of J.K. Rowling.
I have not read (physical- or audiobook) any of Rowling's Harry Potter books, but I have seen a few of the movie versions when they were offered on TV. The movies were excellent, primarily for the special effects, secondarily for the story and characterizations.
So why would I think J.K. could write a non-Potter book that I would enjoy? Beats me. I just got swept up in the Rowling phenomenon, and I wish I hadn't.
None of the characters in this book evoked any strong feelings one way or the other. If anything, I was glad I didn't personally know anyone like these people. They are petty and nasty. The rare glimpses we get of any uplifting human qualities of the personae is fleeting and quickly squelched by their boorishness.
There is not one strong man in this novel, and only by a stretch could you say there is a strong woman. The men are oafs. The women are slatterns. I figured that out pretty early on, but pressed on in hopes that J.K. would manifest some ... magic. Nope.
Other reviewers of this audiobook have drawn comparisons with classics in some genre which I, not regretfully, don't see.
I thought I had learned my lesson about the perils of shopping for books by author-reputation when I bought Grisham's "The Broker" (what a disaster). Apparently I had not, but now I'll try harder to divorce fame from talent when I shop for books.
Elderly, bookish person, omnivorous reader, only bothers to review books she considered worth reading.
The best feature of this book was the author's writing style: "shown rather than told". The portraits of the many couples and small groups of people whose conversations carried the story along were so revealing of themselves and the unfolding situation. No long, prosy expostulations were needed and, wisely, few to none were imposed. .
Ordinarily, not finding an appealing character in the first few chapters dooms any book to unfinished oblivion in my library. But Rowling presenting her characters with only the bare minimum of adjectives, allowing the reader to know them almost entirely through their own words, developing a strong picture of a community through those conversations was so fascinating that I found myself reluctant at 3 a.m. this morning to shut down my Kindle and get some sleep.
I don't enjoy unpleasantness as entertainment or art, so did not find a single scene I could savor. Reminded of the awful day I squirmed my way through the "realist rooms" at a modern art museum, I was more like mesmerized by the author's ability to communicate economically as in a series of paintings all these unhappy people's numb to miserable interactions. But Tom Hollander's reading was so expressively appropriate it brought Rowling's scenes, ranging from mundane to excruciating, to vivid life. I'm sure the author groomed each of those scenes mercilessly into the work of literary art it is.
The ending, of course, was emotionally draining, effectively devastating. I'll need many hugs to put it behind me. Throughout, Casual Vacancy satisfied the non-judgmental people watcher in me, cringing notwithstanding.
Reminded me of reading Shakespeare where everything is revealed through the characters' own words. This book may not be the most beloved ever written, but it will stand as an example of effective, maybe even relentless literary style. I prefer books that leave me with a sense of hope, a redemptive moment to savor. Rowling has created a work of literary art which will grow more important and more admired as time goes on, probably will be required reading for writing and literature classes. I don't like this book of Rowling's, but I respect it just as I respected those really ugly realist paintings hanging in the museum. It's a magnificent piece of work. I'd suggest she take time out to read some Dickens and a few chapters of Winnie the Pooh before she writes her next novel just to recover the hope, humor, and courage that pervaded her previous books. Now that she's said what she needs to say about the hard times that haunted her (may she be healed of her pain), it's time to add some of the qualities that allowed children and adults alike to fall in love with her wizarding world. Adults are not that different from children. They need to be able to find the good in their world and in their books. In conclusion: WOW! What an awesome, incredible, powerful read. Please don't do this to me again.
The is a good book. It is also a disturbing book. If you are sensitive about cursing it isn't a book for you. This book clearly illustrates the consequences of the choices we make and actions we take. It is full of times that you want to grab a character by the shoulders and ask "what were you thinking". It is a great depiction of the hell that many of the poor live in. I can't decide if it is intended to shine a stark light on life as a dependent of the state or if it is to show how the system keeps families in poverty. It could be both.
Narration was very good.
absolutely. I think Rowling is a very creative writer. However, she needs to stick with fantasy.
She could have made the story at least a little interesting.
Probably not. I don't care for narrators that go from one extreme to the other in volume. At one point it's as if he is yelling at you, and then the next moment you can't hear what he's saying.
sadness and disappointment.
I hope Rowling will come up with a new series that is as creative as the Potter series. I think she is brilliant, but am very disappointed in this book.