An extraordinary narration for an extraordinary story.
The obvious answer would have to be Sam, simply because I relate to her. However to answer honestly, I would say Charlie. His character was enthralling and endearing. Very well-developed. He is special and unique, and absolutely *Infinite*.
Charlie, of course. Sheer perfection.
We Are Infinite.
Every once in a while, a story will be told that will be life-changing and incredibly profound. This is one of those stories.Perks of Being a Wallflower is such a deeply affecting novel. It will haunt with you for weeks after reading it, and you will be compelled to reread it over and over again. The characters are well thought out, the story is intensely intimate, engrossing, and wondrous.
Entertaining, coming of age, nostalgia
the end, i wasn't expecting it to end in that way
He played the characters very well, made you feel like you were really listening to someone you knew.
When they were all in the car listening to the song that moved them into silence and happiness...i've had days like that
This series of letters by a teenage boy truly did capture the narrator in all his thoughtful idiosyncrasies. I thought I would love this coming-of-age story, but I got halfway through and realized that there was not much of a story here. It was a series of interesting vignettes, but that was not enough to sustain my interest and continue into the second half of this novel. One problem is that outside of the angst-plagued teenage boy narrator, none of the other characters came alive to me. The writing is great, with so much of teen life right on. But the many details that made me smile were not enough to keep my interest.
The format of this book is pretty original. The main character, Charlie, is writing very personal letters to someone he doesn't know. It starts out during the summer break between grade school and high school, and is set in the early 1990's. He tells the person he's writing to that he's writing to them because he knows they are the kind of person who wouldn't sleep with someone at a party just because they could, and because he knows somehow that they will understand him and not judge. He tells the unknown person the details of his life, starting with a story about his closest friend committing suicide. He talks about starting high school and how he is ok with not having any friends, even though he would like to have some. He also talks about his English teacher taking a special interest in him and giving him extra assignments that the other kids don't have. This leads him into talking about his analysis of the books he reads. I love that part of this book. Then he randomly meets 2 people that change his life. This could be just like some cheesy 80's high school movie, but it's not. Sure there is the normal 'boy pines for girl that is waaay out of his league', but there's more, and you might not even realize it until the end. First, there's a bit of mystery about why Charlie is the way he is, but because we can only see things from his point of view it's hard to get a handle on exactly what it is. Then there is the depth of the character. He is complicated, yet easy to understand. We can all relate to the crazy stuff we all did in high school, and how it felt to be in the in-between phase of life. We can also understand the desire to be liked and have friends, while still trying to figure out who we are. But what makes this all together different from any teen book or movie is the end. It is not all wrapped up for you. That is to say, the boy doesn't get the girl and they don't live happily ever after. Or do they? You'll just have to figure that out for yourself.
Reading allows me to travel through time; to visit the world's unique and stunning places. To become somebody I am not... It is glorious.
The Perks of Being a Wallflower is my daughter's favorite book. She has struggled in life for the last year, so today I decided to read the book hoping for some insight into the teen angst that rules her life currently. I found the book to be a hauntingly lovely and painful exploration of youth.
Charlie is filled with insecurity and the uneasiness of not knowing himself. He struggles with depression and hides from himself and others. Mr Chbosky tells the tale of Charlie through Charlie's letters to an unidentified person. Many reviewers have written about who might be the recipient of those letters. I am not sure that the answer is important and do not think that my opinion is any more important or correct than any of those other opinions. I will just say that the clue I took came from the following quote: "... I saw a girl in class, who didn't notice me, and she talked all about you to a friend of hers. And even though I didn't know you, I felt like I did because you sounded like such a good person. The kind of person who wouldn't mind receiving letters from a kid. The kind of person who would understand how they were better than a diary because there is communion and a diary can be found. I just don't want you to worry about me, or think that you've met me, or waste your time anymore. I am so sorry that I wasted your time because you really do mean a lot to me and I hope you have a very nice life because I really think you deserve it. I really do. I hope you do, too. Okay, then. Goodbye." For me the answer is that Charlie is writing to himself -- the person he understands least. Perhaps that opinion comes from the fact that I know I didn't grasp myself as a teenager, and I don't believe my daughter has a true awareness of herself.
The book is beautifully sad, slightly tragic and full of real insight into the agony of the wallflowers of high school.
I would compare it favorably to Catcher in the Rye (which I reread last year, so it is still pretty fresh in my mind). I think Perks will both be representative of its generation but also speak to future ones.
We listened to this on a long car ride--my husband and I plus our kids, 8 and 14 yrs. We all loved it and were deeply moved. Truly a rare book, exceptional.
I am amazed that people could compare the two books. I found Perks to be gooie with pretension and endlessly smurfy with attempted cleverness. Yuck. Somehow the narrator managed to make it even more corny with his 'adorable' diction intoning the simple pleasures of his profound little excursions through adolescence. There was not a single funny moment and I couldn't wait for it to end.
Something that was not written for coming of age high-school kids.
Alex from Apples text to speech engine
It made me think about what makes a book disappointing; a monotonous progression of obvious ideas presented as if they were profound insights. It also makes me want to read Catcher in the Rye again to see if I can determine what made it a great book.
Always moving. Always listening. Always learning. "After all this time?" "Always."
There's a couple of sure ways to get me interested in a book by an author I haven't read before. One way: have a bunch of highly paid talking heads argue vehemently about what the book actually says, all using the same quotes to back their arguments. That's how I ended up reading/listening to former Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates' memoir, "Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War" (2014) earlier this year.
Another way to grab my attention is to have community members and conservative parents try really hard to ban the book at schools and libraries. "The Perks of Being a Wallflower" has been, off-and-on, one of the top 10 banned books since it was published. According to the American Library Association (a non-profit dedicated to NOT letting books be banned), its been taken off the shelf for: offensive language, abortion, drugs/alcohol/smoking, violence, suicide, homosexuality, and it's sexually explicit.
Now that I've listened to "Wallflower" I can confirm it has all of that - and more. There's also a rape and more than one child molestation. That's a lot for a short book - it's 256 pages in print and a 6 hour 20 minute listen.
The plot and the subject matter isn't easy to hear, but I think it's important for teens to know life can be very, very difficult - and people go through hard times. That's a little patronizing, but that's a reviewer problem, not the book itself. I'm almost 50, I have high schoolers, and I just can't think of a better way to put it.
I was a little disappointed with the vocabulary. Sure, Stephen Chbosky used all the right words - there wasn't a silly euphemism to be found. However, the vocabulary level wasn't quite 5th grade. Since the main character spent most of the book reading literature, the juxtaposition was jarring.
This is 9.0 AR points (source: arbookfind dot com).
(If this review helped, please press yes. Thanks!)
People say I resemble my dog (and vice-versa). He can hear sounds I can't hear, but I'm the one who listens to audiobooks.
No, because I saw the movie before listening to the book (twice, actually), and I liked the movie better. I still liked the book well enough to give it four stars, but I have two theories:
1. I saw the movie a second time because my 13 year old read the book over the summer and wanted to see it, so I went with her even though I'd already seen it. She liked the book better, I liked the movie better -- I think we were both partial to the version we experienced first. She didn't like the changes made in the movie, I thought the changes added depth and drama, especially in the ending. But we both liked both versions regardless of which one we liked better.
2. Rarely does the author of a book get to direct his own screen version. But Stephen Chbosky did, over a decade after publishing the book, and with the experience of writing and producing a TV show (Jericho) in the interim. Although largely faithful to the book, the ending is amplified from an epilogue to a climactic denouement. That carries a lot of weight in my mind, that he had a better idea of how to tell his story.
To put it into an emblematic nutshell, the song in the tunnel scene in the book is Landslide by Fleetwood Mac, in the movie it's Heroes by David Bowie. On my stereo, I like Landslide better. But for that scene? Heroes is so effective. So is the added detail that, in the movie, they didn't know the song when they experienced it in the tunnel, which is not the case in the book with Landslide. Gotta believe Chbosky knew what he was doing here, having grown over the years, and I believe that extends to the other changes he made.
But the book remains a very good read and/or listen, whether you saw the movie or not.
In the book and movie both, the Secret Santa scene is one the most memorable and satisfying moments. In the book, there is actually more depth to the set of gifts Charlie gives Patrick, an instance where it surpasses the movie. And Charlie's makeover, culminating with the typewriter Sam gives him as well as his first kiss, is a major leap his his coming of age.
Patrick is an irresistibly charismatic force in the movie, the person who takes Charlie under his wing for no apparent reason other than the openness of his character, the one who really teaches Charlie to be himself. But he doesn't quite shine that way in the book. As performed by Noah Galvin in Charlie's first person voice, with that much more interior monologue and introspection than is possible on screen, Charlie is clearly the best character, in addition to being the central and most important one.
Yes. Like seeing the movie in one sitting. And it's short enough. I didn't actually get to listen to it straight through, but close enough, listening to it in several bursts over the course of a 36-hour period.