easy to follow
the end was nice
nice little story but clicking of typewriter keys
I really wanted to like this book. And I guess I did. I liked the subject, I liked all of the characters. I liked the way everything ended up. Problem is, everything was wonderful throughout the entire book. No drama? No conflict? No danger? Not even a hangnail and a run in her hose.
Some authors feel the need to have all sorts of horrible stuff happen to their characters. Sometimes way too much horrible stuff, (think anything written by Diana Gabaldon). This book was the complete opposite. Glad everything worked out so well but I just can't bring myself to blow another credit on the sequel.
The book was like the first day of summer. Light, airy and full of fun. Just the right amount of magic, romance & characters you want to be real.
I think Nell, but I enjoyed them all.
Martha did a wonderful job narrating this book.
I nearly did. It isn't the 'suspenseful page turner' but it is a book that if you have the time to sit and listen, will take you away to a place full of surprises, giggles, magic & romance, which will keep you entertained.
I'm excited I found Debora Geary and that this is a series!
There are potentially interesting characters, settings, and dialogue in this book, but who would really care as the reader will eventually discover there is little by way of plot, climax or resolution to the story. Ms Geary presents an interesting premise, but everytime there is an opportunity for a plot to be developed and take direction, it devolves into the characters just accepting even the most profound circumstance, in casual conversation or narrative.
Other than Lauren being slightly perturbed with discovering she is a witch, there is little or no consequence in the world in which these characters live for action they have taken. The use of a drawing-in spell on the internet, a character spontaneously learning that the stranger she just met is likely to be her lover and father of her baby, the repeated warning that an untrained witch is a dangerous witch, all produce no more than a ho-hum effect in this world. Each of these events could have been a vehicle to create some modicum of drama, suspense, action or resolution.
Imagine you favorite aunt reading you a bed-time story.
The performace of this book is annoying. The actress is trying way too hard to sound funny or witty. I admit I couldn't give the story much of a chance. I just couldn't listen to her.
The technical and performance aspects were fine. I normally try to get through the whole book with those conditions met, but not this one. By the end of the first 1/2 hour I knew I wouldn't be able to tolerate the inane dialog for the rest of the book and gave up.
Not meaning the witch jargon, do people really talk like that?
I'm a fan of witchy books, but they need a sense of intelligence and reality. This one missed the mark a bit on both counts.
The narration went on too long—the first few chapters were simply info dumps about who everyone is and what their witchy talents are and why they came together. This book needs some serious developmental editing to pare the story down to an arc that carries the reader on a more engaging journey. The writing is nothing special or connective for me. It was difficult to keep going through the book. I found no sparkle of delight and no feeling of escaping to a world of witchery, unreality, and uniqueness.
The characters felt flat and the dialog stilted and unnatural. The little boy was annoying—though that could be the fault of the narrator. Now, on the topic of the narrator. I read a lot of audio books while I work in my studio or clean my house or cook. I've heard good, great, acceptable, and not good narrations, but this one takes the cake for the most distracting and unpleasant story telling I've heard.
The reader's sing-songy voice annoyed me from the first sentence. She over-emotes and intrudes into the story rather than enhancing it and bringing it to life. I'm thinking she might be the sole reason for my reaction to this book. This woman's voice is grating. The half-restricted phony laugh she has behind her voice is awful. Her interpretation of the child's voice was fake and grating.
I'll stay away from this pair, since there are so many really enjoyable books out there and other readers do such a good job of enhancing the story, but not making it all about their voice acrobatics. Yuck.
I would try to read this book. but will not buy a book narrated by Martha Harmon Pardee unless it is a small kids book.
I will try one. yes.
too giddy, perky.
did not get that far.
No. In the first few chapters the performance sounded contrived. The performer seemed too interested in making her voice exciting, and a few times I lost the story line completely as I was too busy listening to her of her voice rather than what the words actually meant. I was unable to immerse myself into the book, the way I usually do, and instead found myself struggling to understand what was happening.she does eventually control her voice better, but it takes quite awhile and it's very distracting until then.Also the story wasn't interesting. There is nothing happening for the chapters I listened. Basically an ordinary woman discovers she's a witch, and starts getting training because she's so powerful. There are cute kids, loads of ice cream, and chocolate. I guess ice-cream is all that women are interested in as every main female character can't help but eat pints and pints of ice cream. I kept waiting for more to happen but after 15 of 25 chapters, I didn't really care anymore.Plus her friend is going to marry one of the male witches and get pregnant, and have cute kids... plus the little super 4 or 5 year old magician is treacly sweet, even his little pranks are cute. Ugh. This is not exciting to anyone but women that eat lots of ice-cream and want to have a bunch of kids and eat more ice-cream-- for women who don't, this is not appealing or exciting. Also, the characters aren't interesting, they are fairly flat and two dimensional so even if they plot had them doing more, the reader doesn't have enough invested in them to care.I hardly ever stop reading a book, hoping that there is some redeeming quality to it at the end or something, but this book is the first in over 100 audible books, that made me do just that. Plus I'm returning it once my review posts. I hope other readers find this review helpful.
Didn't get there, see review for more explanation.
No, no, no. Half the problem was the performer.
No, but it is a series so I guess there is an audience for it.
I believe someone eats _pints_ of ice cream about five times in the 15 chapters (about half) I read, almost always a woman, apparently we live off the stuff.
This is an odd academic sort of book, but without any history or facts - just one author's primer on what she imagines the craft of witches might be like: the types and sources of magical power, the means of identifying abilities, the heredity (or not) of power, and the training of the craft that shapes the magic. It isn't a magical world, just a world in which magic exists in witches. There's no wonder or whimsey, not much of a plot-line, no mystery, no danger, and everyone in the book is really (really) nice. They are too nice to be multi-dimensional people, but not exactly the Stepford Wives either - just simplistic. Even all the kids are so well behaved that I expect it must take a magic village to raise children without any dysfunction or rebellion. The little bit of romance is referred to but never actually felt. No emotions clutter up this book.
I spent the entire book coasting through the pleasantries waiting for something to actually happen. Since one of the repeated admonitions in the book is: "An untrained witch is a dangerous witch" one would expect at least a blip along the smooth flat-line of the story.
It seems unfair to rate Pardee's reading abilities with this book, but I expect it is her reading that accounts for anything that enlivens the story. Her skill is probably most evident in the fact that the characters were identifiable from each other, even though it must difficult to distinguish characters when they are uniformly undemonstrative.