The best thing about the story was how all the characters lives were weaved together.
The least favorite things was use sparingly used guest narrators. It was billed that Felicia Day was narrating the voice of Lady Katherine -- but she wasn't the character's voice in all the chapters of the book. Same with the other guest narrators.
It broke up the continuity of the book and was distracting to the content of the book.
I hope next time when they bill someone as narrating a character, they narrate the character in every single chapter.
I would if I had some guarantee that the audio levels were adjusted. I primarily listen while I'm driving and I can't hear anything that is said in this book.
The audio volume.
I have no idea. I can't hardly hear what the narrator is saying.
I CAN NOT express how exceedingly happy i was to experience it with a full cast, sound effects, and music. it was like being at a small showing of a play, performed right into my mind.
Just about one of the most interesting, unpredictable, endearing, and adventurous novels I've come across in a long time. I found it absolutely delightful, delectable, and devoid of any ill-fitting character choices or plot developments.
I pretty much squealed with joy at the effect it created and sense of immersion it gave me...multiple times.
the bit of sensible romance that did occur was so unexpected and hardly necessary to keep my attention, but was introduced and handled swimmingly and naturally....i just loved it so much.
Thank you SO MUCH Ellen Kushner.
I'm honored to have experienced this these characters and this story.
Thank you so much Neil Gaiman.
I've never been so thrilled by an audio book as to feel i was plopped into the middle of a play.
I'm currently attempting to refrain from giving Audible all my money, just to devour ALL of this series as soon as possible.
You. Must. Read.
After I exhausted Neil Gaiman's self narrated works for the second time, I was thrilled to learn that he has produced some of his favorite books. The performance is rich and textural, and even better then "Swordspoint" (I'm a huge fan of Barbara Rosenblat). I felt and still feel that Swordspoint didn't come quite together until very near the end of the novel, and was never sure of my opinion of Alec. "Privilege of the Sword" is the sequel that improves and improves upon the original novel in delightful and entirely unexpected ways. Don't miss out, everything is revealed.
The mannered and bloody world of Riverside & the City is escapism at its finest, with nice dose of human insight humming along below the surface.
Building on that foundation, what really takes these stories over the top is the production. The voice acting is stellar and perfectly cast, the characters vibrant and compelling, the background audio engrossing without being distracting. It's an all around wonderful listen, and never fails to pull me into Kushner's world. I love it.
The book was decent, and Barbara Rosenblat and the supporting cast were fantastic. But Ellen Kushner shouldn't be reading her own stuff. More on that below. Mostly, it was fine. But not all that memorable. Neil Gaiman owes me an Audible credit.
Not at all.
As I said, Ellen Kushner shouldn't be reading her own stuff. In this instance, she sounds way too old to narrate the character of a 16 year old girl. And she makes the classic amateur actor's mistake of emphasizing pronouns all over the place. Which ultimately made her sound like Amanda in a bad community theater production of "The Glass Menagerie."Honestly, though, I blame whomever directed this audiobook. That one simple correction would have vastly improved the performance.Still, she's not an actor. She would have done better letting the pros do their job. The difference is pretty striking.
No. It wraps things up in a pretty tidy way, and it's not really compelling enough to go back and revisit the characters.
It's an ok book, but it pulls its punches at the end in a pretty major way.
I doubt it for the author but I probably would for the narrator.
It was extremely slow paced in development. I might have given up for the exciting parts started. Seemed like the same old thing all the time.
About 50 percent of the first third. I didn't/couldn't finish the book so I do not know which elements were critical for the overall story. I might have shortened a few with only the critical parts left.
After the book is over, the author talks a bit about writing it and says that it took her a long time to write this book and she started and put it down quite a bit. It shows. The book tries to recapture the plotting and charming romance of the first but really can't pull it off.
The plot is even more disjointed and incomplete than the first book. There are huge plot problems, like the super abrupt ending to the big conflict, and the complete irrelevance of Lucius and his lover to the entire plot. There are small plot problems, like why does Katherine think she's such good friends with Artemesia that she ought to leap to Artemesia's defense when they've only met twice and one of the times Artemesia laughed at her and won't answer any of her letters?
I suppose it's supposed to be a 'tapestry' that shows all the things that go on in Riverside, but it just wasn't my thing. It seemed like just a list of all the ways women are oppressed in the city. I just wanted more.
Leaving aside my general dislike of the whole multi-narrator premise, the production on this wasn't very good. The narration was so quiet I had to turn up the volume as loud as it would go, only to be frequently deafened by the stupid 'sword' sounds which marked breaks in the chapters. There are good narrators out there who can 'whisper' what characters say without actually lowering their voices to an indecipherable level.
Choosing a different narrator
They had what sounded like a 50 year old woman voice the narrator who was in her teens. Did not match well.